Ullakkomorko, on 24 April 2017 - 10:47 AM, said:
Coming back to the numbers from tits now (which does sound kind of hard doesn't it).
I think the 100 skill (or even 110) given as an average to our player is too high. The 100 skill player would constantly be able to play at the highest theoretical skill level and I think that's an assumption that's hard to defend. Everybody has bad days (or lapses between Fort Knoxs. This would mean that the average high skill should be something close to 90 or 95. Perhaps skill should be interpreted as taking into account tanks as well. Only playing non-stock OP tanks would take the great player into the 100 level.
But those platoon statistics are really interesting. I wouldn't have thought that the effect on the grey area would be so big from the whole platoon's point of view. This makes me want to try playing with a two man unicum + myself platoon. Shame my friends who play WoT aren't quite at unicum levels.
You are right, but that is the point of an experiment. To see results on theoretical level. Real world is not the same exactly. It started with the assumption, that a player constantly plays his/her top level in every game in every tank. Whether he/she is a 50 or 100 skill level player.
on the other hand, the grey zone changes with the toons, amazed me too. I didnt expect such drastic affect on the outcome. I've always thought and known that tooning helps you but this much?
qpranger, on 24 April 2017 - 10:57 AM, said:
We are trying noob!
pecopad, on 24 April 2017 - 02:30 PM, said:
If you look at the stats you can see that you have different WR % depending on the tank...
On the IS you have + 1600 WN8 and 47% WR, and on the KV2 +1500 WN8 and 54% WR.
Actually the IS and KV2 have different Wr% according to VBA (49% the IS and 51,5% the Kv2)
So in this small example you can see that the player (you) has very litle impact on WR...
First of all, I dont believe WN8 is a good measurement of the skill.
The thing is, it looks actually small that the player affects the outcome. in the end only %23 of the battles you can affect while you play solo.
That is the result of the experiment you can clearly see.
and IS and KV2 has different tiers, different play styles. I always think my best tier is tier 6, you can see mostly on my tier 6 meds.
That means with IS, I am an 60 skill player while in KV2 I am an 70 skill player (numbers are made up)
Because while playing with FCM, I have a %45 WR while in bishop I have %60...
You cant say that I have no affect on the outcome.
You can only say that, I suck at playing FCM and I am a dirty clickler.