Jump to content


Update 9.19 Public Test - General Feedback

9.19

  • Please log in to reply
256 replies to this topic

Ph3lan #1 Posted 03 May 2017 - 10:19 AM

    Community Operations Lead WoT EU

  • WG Staff
  • 18606 battles
  • 668
  • [WG] WG
  • Member since:
    11-17-2010

Commanders,

 

Please share all your feedback regarding the Public Test of Update 9.19 below in this topic.

 

For feedback, suggestions and bug reports on specific features, please use the following topics:

 

Update 9.19 Public Test - Ranked Battles Feedback

 

Update 9.19 Public Test - Changes to Sounds Feedback

 

Update 9.19 Public Test - New Missions UI Feedback

 

Update 9.19 Public Test - Clan Management and Strongolds Improvements Feedback

 

Update 9.19 Public Test - New HD Vehicles Feedback

 

Update 9.19 Public Test - Bug Reports

 

Thank you!  :)

 

- Ph3lan

 

 



h4ctor #2 Posted 05 May 2017 - 01:17 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16457 battles
  • 1,821
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012
oh boy i so cannot wait for the drama around bonds thats inevitably coming :popcorn:

leggasiini #3 Posted 05 May 2017 - 01:17 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 15176 battles
  • 6,237
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

No balance changes?

 

 

Spoiler

 


Edited by leggasiini, 05 May 2017 - 01:17 PM.


albee9 #4 Posted 05 May 2017 - 01:21 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 64441 battles
  • 619
  • [ACIDO] ACIDO
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

Is the CT 9.19 online? I run the CT launcher and is still pointing at version 9.18 and indicates that the CT servers are not available

Thanks



Steiner011 #5 Posted 05 May 2017 - 01:25 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39567 battles
  • 1,425
  • [SCRUB] SCRUB
  • Member since:
    10-09-2012

Inb4 Bonds will be available in premium shop in bundles, because thats how WG makes money.

Average Joe will want them  without effort , or unable to earn them because average , the he will start crying on forums "omg I want bonds / its not fair" , WG will provide in prem shop, and thats how to p2w.

 

 

edit: bonds WILL be in prem shop,  because M6A2E1 was in shop ( "we will NEVER sell M6A2E1" , Viktor Kisly`s words )  , Fury was in shop ( "get this tank in this one - time only opportunity" ) , E25 was in shop ( "E25 wont be sold anymore" ) , I could go on forever like this.

 

 


Edited by Steiner011, 05 May 2017 - 01:30 PM.


fighting_falcon93 #6 Posted 05 May 2017 - 01:28 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 32035 battles
  • 4,157
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013

TLDR; Can we please, please be allowed to pick male crew members from personal missions? Not all of us want female crew voices...

 

The problem right now when it comes to crew members is that WG force us to use a certain gender. All of us are different, some enjoy having girls in their tanks, some think it looks ridiculous. But even though it's a pure cosmetic feature, we're still forced to use males as regular crew members, and females as personal mission rewards. It should be up to each individual player what he/she wants to see and hear when playing.

 

Since this is a pure cosmetic feature, I think that players should be given the option to decide if they want males or females in their tanks. Currently we can only get female crew members from personal missions, and if a player want male crew voices or crew images when playing the game, he can't use the female crew members. Since not all players want to use modifications for the game client, this becomes a bit troublesome.

 

My solution to this problem is divided into 2 steps:

- Personal missions should reward the player with "Veteran crew members".

- It should be possible to choose gender when recruiting a crew member.

 

So instead of being rewarded with a female crew member for a certain mission, players are rewarded with a crew member of the same skill-level, but they may choose the gender of the crew member aswell. When recruiting an ordinary crew member, the player may also choose gender of that crew member. This basically means that with my suggestion we would be able to recruit ordinary crew members as females and personal mission crew members as males.

 

 

In order to see the difference between regular and veteran crew members to more easily know which crews that have permanent BiA/SoS and not, there can be some kind of visual difference between them, for instance:

 

Regular crew members:

 

Veteran crew members (suggestion 1):

 

Veteran crew members (suggestion 2):

 

This suggestion would also adress 2 issues with crew members:

 

1. Players would be able to customize their gaming experience to a greater extent. If you want only female crew members, now you can recruit "regular" female crew members for all of your tanks. If you want only male crew members, now you can also recruit males from personal missions. Since it's a cosmetic feature all players should be able to pick what they prefer the most.

 

2. It's quite common that players have one/multiple female crew members left over in the barracks, because SoS doesn't work together with BiA. With this suggestion, you still wouldn't be able to mix BiA and SoS, however you'd be able to mix veteran crew members with regular crew members and therefore fill out the missing spots.

 

So to summarize:

Regular crew members can be either male or female, and they start without any skills. Veteran crew members are awarded from personal missions, they can also be either male or female, and depending on their gender, they get either BiA or SoS for free.

 

If this suggestion would be implemented, there's one more problem that needs to be adressed. Many players have already recruited one or more female crew members and might want to change the gender of these crew members. In order to do this, WG could use a temporary webpage, in which you login with your account. The webpage would then fetch all your crew data and give the player the chance to pick gender of all crew members. When done, the player clicks on a submit button and the data is sent and updated in the database.


Edited by fighting_falcon93, 05 May 2017 - 05:38 PM.


INFERNO1892 #7 Posted 05 May 2017 - 01:38 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 18254 battles
  • 106
  • Member since:
    08-15-2011

Looks promising. Ofc some vehicles will have bigger carry potential (:rolleyes: PVP , Canceridan,...) but that is game balance issue.

Regarding the new currency I think it needs to be simple and onedimensional (no need to buy premium vehicles with that cuz we got gold for that matter).



jagdcommander #8 Posted 05 May 2017 - 04:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 40384 battles
  • 860
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011

 

 

SO HOW ARE THE NEW MAPS COMING ALONG ?



siramra #9 Posted 05 May 2017 - 04:45 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25076 battles
  • 1,185
  • [DUXTR] DUXTR
  • Member since:
    08-21-2011
No removal of stun

JERAF #10 Posted 05 May 2017 - 04:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 19875 battles
  • 3
  • Member since:
    12-13-2013

When will the gold and free xp stop disappearing


Edited by JERAF, 05 May 2017 - 04:47 PM.


juicyfruity #11 Posted 05 May 2017 - 04:48 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 10787 battles
  • 93
  • Member since:
    12-06-2015
I've got got gold and free xp disappearing

SlyMeerkat #12 Posted 05 May 2017 - 04:53 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 16726 battles
  • 2,343
  • [FILO] FILO
  • Member since:
    01-29-2013
Interesting

CabbageTiger #13 Posted 05 May 2017 - 05:05 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6011 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    12-15-2012
I can get onto the server but as a few people have said, free exp and gold keeps disappearing. As soon as it synchronises it just goes away again so I can't actually research or play in any tanks. :L

im13BOT #14 Posted 05 May 2017 - 05:09 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 2492 battles
  • 70
  • [-W-O-] -W-O-
  • Member since:
    04-26-2017

best physic ever:

https://youtu.be/ZeMWav4fE84



thor2617 #15 Posted 05 May 2017 - 05:22 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 2756 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    05-11-2013

Well, the link won't download for me so u got another one or is it going to be fixed?

 

 



OnceBittenTwiceShy #16 Posted 05 May 2017 - 05:24 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 43212 battles
  • 63
  • Member since:
    09-22-2014
Female Japanese Voices - So funny. Feels like GuP :P

Hocus_Pocus_Gold_Focus #17 Posted 05 May 2017 - 05:32 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 35082 battles
  • 34
  • Member since:
    12-22-2012
You know why the test server is a failer? Indeed becauce evryone is firering Premium/gold rounds. and becauce of that testing is usless

Somnorila #18 Posted 05 May 2017 - 05:34 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 55990 battles
  • 2,043
  • [4-YOU] 4-YOU
  • Member since:
    10-13-2012

As always you take a good idea and smear it with WGness...

It's good that you make it only for top tanks but instead of adding even more imbalances in the form of "rewards" wouldn't be better and more logical to actually make all players play from a leveled plain?! Negating all bonuses from equipment and crew as well as making all consumables and ammo free, or just limit ammo and consumables to be non premium only, would seem a lot more proper. 



_Sterben_EU #19 Posted 05 May 2017 - 05:34 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 1902 battles
  • 49
  • Member since:
    07-03-2014

Can't download the Test Client :(



thor2617 #20 Posted 05 May 2017 - 05:36 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 2756 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    05-11-2013
The link takes me to a site wich is a defect site or something.





Also tagged with 9.19

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users