Jump to content


Suggestion for foch:


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
46 replies to this topic

thiextar #1 Posted 19 May 2017 - 10:54 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13642 battles
  • 337
  • Member since:
    06-21-2012
Reupload the video. Simple as that. If wargaming copyright strikes you at this point, they will have an outrage 100x worse than they currently have on their hands. Basically a big middle finger that wg can do absolutely nothing about.

Freg0 #2 Posted 19 May 2017 - 11:19 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 34926 battles
  • 117
  • [SIC-1] SIC-1
  • Member since:
    07-02-2011
Popular youtubers are already spreading this shameless reaction of Wg. They deserve it doe for suing/threatening someone for he's opinion. I totally agree with SirFoch and I support him.

brumbarr #3 Posted 19 May 2017 - 11:19 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 32760 battles
  • 2,682
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012
tbh, at this point foch does not want the drama. He is prob already surprised how far it has gone and jsut wants to chill. I dont think he cares too much.

Freg0 #4 Posted 19 May 2017 - 11:41 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 34926 battles
  • 117
  • [SIC-1] SIC-1
  • Member since:
    07-02-2011

View Postbrumbarr, on 19 May 2017 - 10:19 PM, said:

tbh, at this point foch does not want the drama. He is prob already surprised how far it has gone and jsut wants to chill. I dont think he cares too much.

 

Hopefully that is what's going to happen/

Conor_Notorious_McGregor #5 Posted 19 May 2017 - 11:42 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21480 battles
  • 7,548
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    09-09-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 19 May 2017 - 11:19 PM, said:

tbh, at this point foch does not want the drama. He is prob already surprised how far it has gone and jsut wants to chill. I dont think he cares too much.

 

he cares.. why make a second video? why remove the first?

 

*edit*


Edited by Jahrakajin, 22 May 2017 - 12:11 PM.
Inappropriate remarks


thiextar #6 Posted 19 May 2017 - 11:47 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13642 battles
  • 337
  • Member since:
    06-21-2012
We dont need to "Chill out" We need to get very very upset, maybe this whole thing can spread and evolve to the point where wargaming might finally start taking game balance seriously again.

Jigabachi #7 Posted 19 May 2017 - 11:52 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 16993 battles
  • 14,544
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View Postthiextar, on 19 May 2017 - 11:47 PM, said:

We dont need to "Chill out" We need to get very very upset, maybe this whole thing can spread and evolve to the point where wargaming might finally start taking game balance seriously again.

Err... that whole drama wasn't about gamebalance. :rolleyes:



ZlatanArKung #8 Posted 19 May 2017 - 11:55 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 2,183
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostJigabachi, on 19 May 2017 - 11:52 PM, said:

Err... that whole drama wasn't about gamebalance. :rolleyes:

 

His video was about Wargamings failure at gamebalancing.



Jigabachi #9 Posted 19 May 2017 - 11:58 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 16993 battles
  • 14,544
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostZlatanArKung, on 19 May 2017 - 11:55 PM, said:

His video was about Wargamings failure at gamebalancing.

But everything that followed wasn't.



Jimbodiah #10 Posted 20 May 2017 - 12:01 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 7985 battles
  • 2,170
  • [HOFF] HOFF
  • Member since:
    04-28-2015
No, that was about a company trying to censor with the threat of copyright claims (that they would lose in court) and a youtuber not wanting the hassle of a 500M company gunning for him.

thiextar #11 Posted 20 May 2017 - 12:05 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 13642 battles
  • 337
  • Member since:
    06-21-2012

Point is that this whole thing started with game balance, simply because its a very real issue and knowing it or not, foch did exactly the right thing. If he had just said in a constructive way why he doesnt like the tank, then none of this would have happened, and there would still be no attention to the issues of this game. As it is now, tons of youtubers and other people have started jumping on the bandwagon, if the entire team of eu community contributors starts to question wargaming, they might actually have to act.

 

This is a catalyst, nothing more.



Spurtung #12 Posted 20 May 2017 - 12:28 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 52567 battles
  • 1,933
  • [UP-EU] UP-EU
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostConor_Notorious_McGregor, on 19 May 2017 - 11:42 PM, said:

 

he cares.. why make a second video? why remove the first?

 

*edit*

 

 

Because making money off the game is more important.
 

View PostSixDasherr, on 20 May 2017 - 12:01 AM, said:

No, that was about a company trying to censor with the threat of copyright claims (that they would lose in court) and a youtuber not wanting the hassle of a 500M company gunning for him.

How exactly would WG lose that in court if he uses images from their copyrighted game in his videos?


 

Edited by Jahrakajin, 22 May 2017 - 12:15 PM.


Jimbodiah #13 Posted 20 May 2017 - 02:14 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 7985 battles
  • 2,170
  • [HOFF] HOFF
  • Member since:
    04-28-2015
Because there is no © infringement, as the footage of gameplay he uses falls under fair-use. Other companies have tried to sue youtubers when they did not like their opinions, and lost.

Check Jim Sterling's channel, he went through this for a bad review he did on another game, and he won. This is the same guy doing a review of WG on monday, by the way. I guess Phelan will have his cheeks puckered up all weekend in anticipation of the shitestorm he has created.

Edited by SixDasherr, 20 May 2017 - 02:19 AM.


NUKLEAR_SLUG #14 Posted 20 May 2017 - 03:47 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 21294 battles
  • 590
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
You can present an unpopular opinion constructively without being a whiny [edited]. A skill Foch needs to learn.

FryingTonight #15 Posted 20 May 2017 - 04:27 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11153 battles
  • 45
  • Member since:
    10-02-2015
Kind of sums up 9.18 too.

PauI #16 Posted 20 May 2017 - 04:57 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 17350 battles
  • 190
  • [FALX] FALX
  • Member since:
    10-15-2011

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 20 May 2017 - 02:47 AM, said:

You can present an unpopular opinion constructively without being a whiny [edited]. A skill Foch needs to learn.

 

he can do whatever the fck he pleases, like your trolling.....you could shut the fck up ...or not ..... like can be seen above....you got the idea now about the freedom of speech?

Kreshow #17 Posted 20 May 2017 - 05:28 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 41249 battles
  • 88
  • [EX_SQ] EX_SQ
  • Member since:
    10-14-2014

I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!



pucku #18 Posted 20 May 2017 - 06:22 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24793 battles
  • 205
  • Member since:
    03-25-2012
WG hasn't failed at balancing since their aim has never been to balance the tanks. They want tank X to be OP for a while so everyone gets premium accounts to make the grind to X faster. Then they nerf X and make Y OP instead. And lately they even started making OP premium tanks.

Jigabachi #19 Posted 20 May 2017 - 06:55 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 16993 battles
  • 14,544
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostPauI, on 20 May 2017 - 04:57 AM, said:

he can do whatever the fck he pleases, like your trolling.....you could shut the fck up ...or not ..... like can be seen above....you got the idea now about the freedom of speech?

You have no idea what freedom of speech is.

Hint: Don't confuse it with the freedom to talk crap, because that one doesn't exist.



TaHko3d #20 Posted 20 May 2017 - 07:04 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22699 battles
  • 996
  • Member since:
    02-25-2014
Suggestion to WG, - cut off that whiny b for good and strike his youtube channel. Make an example for all the rest of whiny b-s.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users