Jump to content


Chrysler K

Fat

  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

Jackarl #21 Posted 25 May 2017 - 04:29 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 35694 battles
  • 296
  • Member since:
    05-06-2012

View PostMarlekin, on 25 May 2017 - 04:20 PM, said:

Got in my Lowe, loaded 294 pen APCR, when they realised their pay2win armor could not save them

 

 

 

Curious. Using p2w against "p2w." Great logic, great double standard ;)

 

On the other hand, Chrysler armor isn't that special. People make a way bigger deal than it actually is. It's not like it's the only tier 8 with ~215mm effective lfp.


Edited by Jackarl, 25 May 2017 - 04:30 PM.


Marlekin #22 Posted 25 May 2017 - 04:47 PM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 33482 battles
  • 4,123
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010

View PostJackarl, on 25 May 2017 - 04:29 PM, said:

Curious. Using p2w against "p2w." Great logic, great double standard 

 

You think the Lowe is pay2win? I'm.. 

 

no im not even going to



MrClark56 #23 Posted 29 May 2017 - 08:18 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 6795 battles
  • 2,501
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013

View PostMarlekin, on 25 May 2017 - 04:47 PM, said:

 

You think the Lowe is pay2win? I'm.. 

 

no im not even going to

 

I think he was implying that you were using P2w ammo to fight P2w armor.. it was not about the tank itself..

Antaris #24 Posted 29 May 2017 - 08:02 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 74200 battles
  • 336
  • [X-TRA] X-TRA
  • Member since:
    05-14-2011

View PostHammerhead20, on 22 May 2017 - 10:32 AM, said:

 

Can I ask you something?

 

Why you are still spending your money on this game?

 

+1

 

For virtual services i can pay only virtual currency from the same manner(ingame gold, that not buyed with real money). Since the beginning of the game I have paid maybe 50-100 euros, and I hate myself for that.



THE_JACK_OF_HEARTS #25 Posted 01 June 2017 - 02:25 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9587 battles
  • 912
  • [CMC3] CMC3
  • Member since:
    02-04-2015
lowe is just food the Chrysler monster please show us replays of you in your lowe killing these, and the guy in the is6 also , muppets LOL.

Rokim #26 Posted 03 June 2017 - 11:29 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28495 battles
  • 1,067
  • Member since:
    03-04-2012

View PostAsghaad, on 25 May 2017 - 12:28 PM, said:

uhh how exactly will IS6 pen Chrysler when its lower glacis when properly angled is 235 mm effective against APCR ?

View PostSilentFear, on 25 May 2017 - 03:01 PM, said:

 i dont know what drugs you are using but - good luck pening the Chrysler whit IS-6 even if you use premium ammo. 

Anything whit less then 220 pen on its gun can go kill itself.

 

IS-6 is tier 7 against chrysler,its got same chances as IS,autopenned without much ability to fight back.

In other words when u meet him frontaly just point turret in the floor and let him beating you,u cant hurt him.


Edited by Rokim, 03 June 2017 - 11:38 AM.


malte4 #27 Posted 06 June 2017 - 08:22 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 31584 battles
  • 27
  • [OMFG] OMFG
  • Member since:
    03-22-2013
Will this tank be for sale again?:)

General_McMuschi #28 Posted 18 June 2017 - 07:13 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23950 battles
  • 834
  • Member since:
    06-19-2015

Everyone who says this tank isn't OP is wrong.

 

First of all, why are all premium tanks suddenly better than standard tanks of the same tier/class/nation? Long ago it was exactly the opposite and it was what balanced them. Premiums would make more money and train crew better, BUT would have more weaknesses and be weaker in general. Let's just remember the Matilda BP for example, or the T3485M, or the KV-5. Then, WG started making premiums as competitive as standard tanks of the same class/tier/nation so they added tanks like IS3A, Berlin tanks, black tanks such as T34B, IS6B, Blackdog... Then WG went full retard and decided to be pay to win by adding tanks that are clearly better than standards...

Second of all, saying it's not OP is just like saying KV-220 isn't OP. They both have excellent armor and crap guns with poor pen. But KV-220 at least doesn't have very good premium pen, and has frontal weakspot (turret). We all know KV-220 is OP, so how can anyone say that Chrysler, which is a t8 KV-220 in a way, isn't OP? 

I still think Defender is better than Chrysler, so is Liberte, and Patriot is way more flexible. They are all OP imo. And I think some tanks should really get buffs just to be able to play in what game has become due to people playing all of these OP tanks. For start, I think my T54mod1 needs several buffs, and Centurion mark 1. 

Speaking of Centurion, and other British tanks - it used to be a British thing to have a pretty mediocre if not crappy tank with good gun accuracy and pen. British tanks sacrifice almost everything just to have "good" pen and it's pretty similar with French line. Now, this "good" pen became just "normal" pen and all the other tanks have 220-260mm of pen while at the same time having other advatages that British tanks don't have, such as armor and very often mobility. It's gamebreaking and I am upset that WG doesn't see it.


Edited by General_McMuschi, 18 June 2017 - 07:26 AM.


FluffyRedFox #29 Posted 18 June 2017 - 11:17 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 25091 battles
  • 9,093
  • [FLOOF] FLOOF
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

View Postmalte4, on 06 June 2017 - 07:22 AM, said:

Will this tank be for sale again?:)

Hopefully not.



Sams_Baneblade #30 Posted 18 June 2017 - 11:41 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17649 battles
  • 1,200
  • [SA_LT] SA_LT
  • Member since:
    04-24-2012

View PostGeneral_McMuschi, on 18 June 2017 - 07:13 AM, said:

Let's just remember the Matilda BP for example, or the T3485M, or the KV-5.

And have a look again at the current T-34-85M, to realize it went from UP to an armoured Rudy with Cromwell's DPM. Balance, Kamerad. :trollface:



THE_JACK_OF_HEARTS #31 Posted 18 June 2017 - 01:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9587 battles
  • 912
  • [CMC3] CMC3
  • Member since:
    02-04-2015
best investment I ever bought, fire gold only and still make a nice profit this tank is a darling x. You don't think id fire standard ammo in this do ya ?? LOL. I thought cant beat them join them, and tbh you guys who didn't buy one on principle are fools, there will be an anime tank out soon which is more op, get with it or without it your choices x

THE_JACK_OF_HEARTS #32 Posted 18 June 2017 - 01:14 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9587 battles
  • 912
  • [CMC3] CMC3
  • Member since:
    02-04-2015
best thing is killing Lowes, its allways a pleasure and now my lowe gathers dust.

Lerxst2012 #33 Posted 05 July 2017 - 09:12 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 66264 battles
  • 230
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

I dont own one of these and am unlikely to own one. Personally I don't rate it.

 

It doesn't have preferential match making and when I ever meet one of these tanks I find it easy to penetrate.

 

Side armour is dreadful.  If I meet it head on unless I can fire heat I usually avoid.   

 

I've not seen one of these tanks dominate a game like the Defender/Obj 252U can.

 

Probably depends who is playing it to be fair but I've seen mediocre Defender players dominate a game.

 

Waste of money.  Pene 198 with APCR.  Nah waste of money to buy and play as I guess you need to fire GOLD if you regularly see tier 9 and tier 10 battles.



Lerxst2012 #34 Posted 05 July 2017 - 09:15 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 66264 battles
  • 230
  • Member since:
    08-17-2012

View PostGeneral_McMuschi, on 18 June 2017 - 06:13 AM, said:

Everyone who says this tank isn't OP is wrong.

 

First of all, why are all premium tanks suddenly better than standard tanks of the same tier/class/nation? Long ago it was exactly the opposite and it was what balanced them. Premiums would make more money and train crew better, BUT would have more weaknesses and be weaker in general. Let's just remember the Matilda BP for example, or the T3485M, or the KV-5. Then, WG started making premiums as competitive as standard tanks of the same class/tier/nation so they added tanks like IS3A, Berlin tanks, black tanks such as T34B, IS6B, Blackdog... Then WG went full retard and decided to be pay to win by adding tanks that are clearly better than standards...

Second of all, saying it's not OP is just like saying KV-220 isn't OP. They both have excellent armor and crap guns with poor pen. But KV-220 at least doesn't have very good premium pen, and has frontal weakspot (turret). We all know KV-220 is OP, so how can anyone say that Chrysler, which is a t8 KV-220 in a way, isn't OP? 

I still think Defender is better than Chrysler, so is Liberte, and Patriot is way more flexible. They are all OP imo. And I think some tanks should really get buffs just to be able to play in what game has become due to people playing all of these OP tanks. For start, I think my T54mod1 needs several buffs, and Centurion mark 1. 

Speaking of Centurion, and other British tanks - it used to be a British thing to have a pretty mediocre if not crappy tank with good gun accuracy and pen. British tanks sacrifice almost everything just to have "good" pen and it's pretty similar with French line. Now, this "good" pen became just "normal" pen and all the other tanks have 220-260mm of pen while at the same time having other advatages that British tanks don't have, such as armor and very often mobility. It's gamebreaking and I am upset that WG doesn't see it.

 

Your opening statement is simple to answer.

 

If premium tanks are better than standard tanks people will buy them.  If not why would they bother.

 

Makes business sense to develop better tanks but long term you could ruin your product and people may stop playing.


Edited by Lerxst2012, 05 July 2017 - 09:15 PM.


Noo_Noo #35 Posted 06 July 2017 - 05:35 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 22560 battles
  • 2,966
  • Member since:
    05-05-2013

View PostLerxst2012, on 05 July 2017 - 09:15 PM, said:

 

 

If premium tanks are better than standard tanks people will buy them.  If not why would they bother.

 

 

 

They never used to be. They were slightly worse and deliberately so with the credit bonus and crew training bonus being the reason you played them. 

now its about the crew training, credits and WR. Or with Tier 8 being the mess that it is staying competitive at Tier 8.



mikeracecat #36 Posted 07 July 2017 - 08:18 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 18990 battles
  • 20
  • [A_G] A_G
  • Member since:
    03-29-2015

i love the video of sir foch raning about the crysler xD

https://www.youtube....h?v=Z9juoiLgzFU



Suurpolskija #37 Posted 09 July 2017 - 10:53 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 22615 battles
  • 2,116
  • [KANKI] KANKI
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016

It's very cleverly armoured. Strong enough not to reliably pen it with standard ammo @ tier8, yet pennable / easily penned by premium ammo. Makes lives of stock tanks a nightmare so people are more tempted to free exp the top guns to be able to put up a fight. Also it's pretty easy adversary for tier IX & X tanks so that makes playing higher tiers more tempting.

 

Of course the tank itself has very low pen, but very good premium ammo so also shooting premium ammo with it is pretty much the only sensible option.

 

There you go. A tank that was planned to make money for WG on so many levels. Too bad for them, it wasn't more popular, because it cannot stand against Defender or Patriot.


Edited by Suurpolskija, 09 July 2017 - 10:54 AM.


Triskell_ #38 Posted 17 September 2017 - 06:08 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24811 battles
  • 5
  • [XLEG] XLEG
  • Member since:
    11-15-2014
Hello. lately using Chrysler K GF. I naturally always lose. the reason I am writing to you is whether you are going to chase the Chrysler to other tiers 8. it is not OP. a heavy premium tier 8 that penetrates 198 with the AP ??? !!! the lowe is better, also defender. since they are lower and penetrate more with APs. they also talk about the World of Tanks Italy page. I do not think anyone will buy this cart unless you put it. regards

Zirakss #39 Posted 17 September 2017 - 06:56 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17033 battles
  • 554
  • [U__G] U__G
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012
Just put in some more HE shells for those things. The engine deck is very thin. All you have to do, is to shoot at the lowest visible part of the turret. The blast will hit the engine deck too and that will really hurt! The ideal spot ist directly beyond or beside the gun.

neferrun #40 Posted 11 October 2017 - 02:04 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3367 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    03-12-2015
golddigers has more dignity than WG. 





Also tagged with Fat

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users