Jump to content


People opinion of 9.19 on youtube


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

Yaccay #1 Posted 04 June 2017 - 06:34 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31559 battles
  • 1,823
  • Member since:
    11-21-2012

The numbers of thumbs up and down at the creation of this post.

 

"Update review 9.19".   844 thumbs up, 1806 thumbs down

 

"Ranked Battle Mode: Beta Season". 327 thumbs up, 591 thumbs down.

 

North America "Update 9.19 Overview". 650 thumbs up, 984 thumbs down.

 

 

 

 

 



Sfinski #2 Posted 04 June 2017 - 06:54 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29704 battles
  • 1,963
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Still carrying over from the Fochgate I think. 

signal11th #3 Posted 04 June 2017 - 07:30 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33872 battles
  • 5,222
  • [E-BAY] E-BAY
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011

View PostSfinski, on 04 June 2017 - 05:54 PM, said:

Still crying over from the Fochgate I think.

 

Fixed that for you.

Capus #4 Posted 04 June 2017 - 08:19 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38741 battles
  • 1,767
  • Member since:
    05-13-2012

View PostSfinski, on 04 June 2017 - 05:54 PM, said:

Still carrying over from the Fochgate I think. 

 

Or maybe it is because allowing improved equipment in randoms is utter male bovine fecal matter.

 

And even worse is that once it's introduced it's going to be nigh impossible to remove it ever again from the game. In other words this game is now officialy ruined.



CptBarney #5 Posted 04 June 2017 - 08:29 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18915 battles
  • 3,914
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013
I find it funny how ranked battles werent avalible from the get go, either way im going to see if AW's 0.20 can hook me back into the game.

Frostilicus #6 Posted 04 June 2017 - 08:32 PM

    Major

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 22377 battles
  • 2,741
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011

View PostCptBarney, on 04 June 2017 - 07:29 PM, said:

I find it funny how ranked battles werent avalible from the get go, either way im going to see if AW's 0.20 can hook me back into the game.

 

I've weaned myself of WoT with a mixture of Warships and Warcraft :)

CptBarney #7 Posted 04 June 2017 - 08:37 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18915 battles
  • 3,914
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013

View PostFrostilicus, on 04 June 2017 - 07:32 PM, said:

 

I've weaned myself of WoT with a mixture of Warships and Warcraft :)

 

im getting into paladins, stellaris and garrys mod again, with a bit of warthunder.

Edited by CptBarney, 04 June 2017 - 08:37 PM.


Frostilicus #8 Posted 04 June 2017 - 08:39 PM

    Major

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 22377 battles
  • 2,741
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011
Forgot about warthunder, been flying my low tier brits and russians too :)

CptBarney #9 Posted 04 June 2017 - 08:41 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18915 battles
  • 3,914
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013

View PostFrostilicus, on 04 June 2017 - 07:39 PM, said:

Forgot about warthunder, been flying my low tier brits and russians too :)

Japs and brits for me havent gone above 3.7 yet for planes trying to research the last true panther 1 varient in the german line so i can get something different lol. I really like stellaris though.



Bucifel #10 Posted 04 June 2017 - 09:03 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27715 battles
  • 1,373
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

thx for videos

i just disliked all of them ;)

 

Thumbs Down !



SheWasOver18 #11 Posted 04 June 2017 - 10:49 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 2352 battles
  • 84
  • Member since:
    12-11-2014

View PostBucifel, on 04 June 2017 - 10:03 PM, said:

thx for videos

i just disliked all of them ;)

 

Thumbs Down !

 

Ha, I did the same! On the last video, the first comment is sooooo good!

tajj7 #12 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:56 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 24351 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View PostCapus, on 04 June 2017 - 07:19 PM, said:

 

Or maybe it is because allowing improved equipment in randoms is utter male bovine fecal matter.

 

And even worse is that once it's introduced it's going to be nigh impossible to remove it ever again from the game. In other words this game is now officialy ruined.

 

Ot maybe people could be have a hissy fit because they are massively ignorant?

 

Like the majority of the playerbase are and because they have no clue about how ranked battles works or how bonds etc. works. 

 

Yeh I'll go with that. 



TankkiPoju #13 Posted 05 June 2017 - 11:54 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 19620 battles
  • 6,084
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostCapus, on 04 June 2017 - 08:19 PM, said:

In other words this game is now officialy ruined.

 

It's funny how the game has been officially ruined every month since 2011.

 

Six months in the future, no one will cry about ranked battles including SirFoch, becuase they all noticed the improved equipment does practically nothing at all. Why don't people complain about premium consumables in random games? Those actually make a difference, and are waaaaay more pay to win. Heck, even camo on tanks is more pay to win.

 

And many players are going to say ranked battles are actually a good thing, since it allows F2P players to get equipment faster too... and you can get 6th sense and camo or repairs for every tank with bonds, until your crew gets better.

 


Edited by TankkiPoju, 05 June 2017 - 12:00 PM.


Capus #14 Posted 05 June 2017 - 12:12 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38741 battles
  • 1,767
  • Member since:
    05-13-2012

View Posttajj7, on 05 June 2017 - 08:56 AM, said:

 

Ot maybe people could be have a hissy fit because they are massively ignorant?

 

Like the majority of the playerbase are and because they have no clue about how ranked battles works or how bonds etc. works. 

 

Yeh I'll go with that. 

 

Hold the insults there.

 

Ask yourself this: what do improved equipments add to the game?

Do they add new gameplay mechanics?

Do they add real new content?

Nope, the only thing they add are a further means for little kids to feel 'skilled' by driving a tank which is superior to that of others and just killing them. Apart from that they also add a huge need to spam premium ammo (asif ppl aren't just gonna go full premium ammo in ranked battles).  This equipment is nothing but a gold sink, which adds nothing to the game other then unbalance.

 

Don't go calling other ppl ignorant when you yourself have no clue about what this improved equipment is about. You should try thinking stuff through instead of just calling others names and getting distracted by shiny things, instead of pretending you are the all knowing and therefor everyone else must be a dumb***.

 

 

I wouldn't mind it if it were only active in ranked battles. That would be perfectly fine. But nope.


Edited by Capus, 05 June 2017 - 12:16 PM.


DracheimFlug #15 Posted 05 June 2017 - 12:15 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 8920 battles
  • 3,697
  • Member since:
    11-13-2014

View PostCapus, on 05 June 2017 - 12:12 PM, said:

 

Hold the insults there.

 

Ask yourself this: what do improved equipments add to the game?

Do they add new gameplay mechanics?

Do they add real new content?

Nope, the only thing they add are a further means for little kids like you to feel 'skilled' by driving a tank which is superior to that of others and just killing them. Apart from that they also add a huge need to spam premium ammo (asif ppl aren't just gonna go full premium ammo in ranked battles).  This equipment is nothing but a gold sink, which adds nothing to the game other then unbalance.

 

Don't go calling other ppl ignorant when all you want is to get advantages over others ingame so you can feel good. I honestly pitty you.

 

They add a goal/ reward for those playing ranked battles, something for those with tier 10 tanks who are otherwise at the end of development in game. Whether that is something good for the game to add is indeed questionable, but it is something, and there are arguments in favour not just against.

Capus #16 Posted 05 June 2017 - 12:18 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38741 battles
  • 1,767
  • Member since:
    05-13-2012

View PostDracheimFlug, on 05 June 2017 - 11:15 AM, said:

 

They add a goal/ reward for those playing ranked battles, something for those with tier 10 tanks who are otherwise at the end of development in game. Whether that is something good for the game to add is indeed questionable, but it is something, and there are arguments in favour not just against

I'm still to see a single argument in favour. Honestly convince me, i wouldn't mind. Also if ppl really want to play ranked then it would already be a bonus for them to have the equipment in ranked battles only, since that's the mode they want to play, right? Or they could do like virtualy any other game in existance that has similar modes and just give out cosmetics to satisfy the e-peen.

 

I don't see any reason (from a player's perspective) why this should spill over into random battles. Other then ppl's desire to play with superior tanks and feel all good about themselves. From WG's perspective however i do see many reasons for it.


Edited by Capus, 05 June 2017 - 12:22 PM.


Yaccay #17 Posted 05 June 2017 - 12:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31559 battles
  • 1,823
  • Member since:
    11-21-2012

View PostDracheimFlug, on 05 June 2017 - 12:15 PM, said:

 

They add a goal/ reward for those playing ranked battles, something for those with tier 10 tanks who are otherwise at the end of development in game. Whether that is something good for the game to add is indeed questionable, but it is something, and there are arguments in favour not just against.

 

Giving a a goal /reward to Tier X tanks is fine, but those rewards should stay in ranked battles.  (Or if those rewards are out of ranked battles, then those rewards should be only give xp boost, credit boost, unique emblems, camo, etc, but should not help to win easier)




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users