Jump to content


5th June 1967 - tanks go into battle.

the most unlikely tech tree

  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

arthurwellsley #1 Posted 05 June 2017 - 01:50 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51001 battles
  • 2,724
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

5th June 1967, tanks roll for six days.

M4 Sherman

Centurion (note 3 moe)

AMX (only 1 moe)

*edit*


Edited by Jahrakajin, 05 June 2017 - 03:15 PM.
Removed the link, lets discuss tanks not politics


AvengerOrion #2 Posted 05 June 2017 - 02:09 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25328 battles
  • 1,013
  • Member since:
    12-21-2013
This will end well. :popcorn:

arthurwellsley #3 Posted 05 June 2017 - 02:22 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51001 battles
  • 2,724
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

View PostAvengerOrion, on 05 June 2017 - 01:09 PM, said:

This will end well. :popcorn:

 

I suspect you are correct (hence the somewhat tongue in cheek sub-title).

Tech tree posted below is not my own work,  it was made by a player called - Life_in_Black;


Edited by arthurwellsley, 05 June 2017 - 02:34 PM.


arthurwellsley #4 Posted 05 June 2017 - 02:26 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51001 battles
  • 2,724
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

View PostAvengerOrion, on 05 June 2017 - 01:19 PM, said:

And so it begins, I love saying "I told you so" :rolleyes:

 

[/com_pedantic mode 1]

 

7. No inappropriate/sensitive topics

Avoid discussions about:

  • Religion
  • Sex
  • Politics
  • Social issues
  • Also avoid inappropriate names, avatars or signatures including controversial religious, political or historical figures.

 

OP = date of war (history), pictures of three tanks, humorous comment about moe on two of the pictures. Trying to be non-judgemental personally and concentrate on tanks used.

AvengerOrion #5 Posted 05 June 2017 - 02:36 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25328 battles
  • 1,013
  • Member since:
    12-21-2013

View Postarthurwellsley, on 05 June 2017 - 02:26 PM, said:

 

OP = date of war (history), pictures of three tanks, humorous comment about moe on two of the pictures. Trying to be non-judgemental personally and concentrate on tanks used.

 

I know you are trying to disguise the bait, but we can see you already caught something in post #3 :teethhappy:



Jahrakajin #6 Posted 05 June 2017 - 02:45 PM

  • Guest
Sometimes I hate when I am the Mod who discovers one of those tricky Threads...

Alright lets try this, other nations tech trees have been discussed before so per se nothing wrong with the Thread topic. HOWEVER as pointed out we don't wan't to have political or religious discussions on the Forum, its about tank who make and go boom! 

Sooo...I will hide a couple of posts who are a bit...political and may cause unwanted responses. Stick to the tanks and tanks only please. 

I'll be sticking around as well in hope this doesn't end in some huge discussion about the two things mentioned above.

Wish me luck.


AvengerOrion #7 Posted 05 June 2017 - 02:51 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25328 battles
  • 1,013
  • Member since:
    12-21-2013

Oh well why not: Good luck Jahrakajin.

 



signal11th #8 Posted 05 June 2017 - 02:54 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 34971 battles
  • 5,430
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011

View PostJahrakajin, on 05 June 2017 - 01:45 PM, said:

Sometimes I hate when I am the Mod who discovers one of those tricky Threads...

Alright lets try this, other nations tech trees have been discussed before so per se nothing wrong with the Thread topic. HOWEVER as pointed out we don't wan't to have political or religious discussions on the Forum, its about tank who make and go boom! 

Sooo...I will hide a couple of posts who are a bit...political and may cause unwanted responses. Stick to the tanks and tanks only please. 

I'll be sticking around as well in hope this doesn't end in some huge discussion about the two things mentioned above.

Wish me luck.

 

Nice to see a Mod that takes a active interest in the forum and doesn't go with the delete hammer straight away.

Strappster #9 Posted 05 June 2017 - 03:01 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 23695 battles
  • 8,888
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View Postarthurwellsley, on 05 June 2017 - 12:50 PM, said:

 

"Why is that noob up front? Doesn't he know he's only got 200 pen with his APCR standard rounds?"



jabster #10 Posted 05 June 2017 - 03:07 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12526 battles
  • 22,456
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View Postsignal11th, on 05 June 2017 - 01:54 PM, said:

 

Nice to see a Mod that takes a active interest in the forum and doesn't go with the delete hammer straight away.

 

Why wouldn't a mod just delete a thread that's obvious troll bait?



Desyatnik_Pansy #11 Posted 05 June 2017 - 03:08 PM

    Bartender

  • Player
  • 15011 battles
  • 25,559
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013

View Postsignal11th, on 05 June 2017 - 02:54 PM, said:

Nice to see a Mod that takes a active interest in the forum and doesn't go with the delete hammer straight away.

 

Some of the mods I've seen lately don't seem pretty bad (unlike some from older days that I dare not name), and Jahra seems like probably the best. I just hope he shoots enough Gold to make that "honorary Dinger" title worth it. 



Browarszky #12 Posted 05 June 2017 - 03:12 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 15547 battles
  • 3,339
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View Postarthurwellsley, on 05 June 2017 - 01:26 PM, said:

 

OP = date of war (history), pictures of three tanks, humorous comment about moe on two of the pictures. Trying to be non-judgemental personally and concentrate on tanks used.

 

I'm curious, if war is an extension of politics, does from that follow that, by extension, historical events such as wars and related operations are on the list of topics to be avoided.

 

And who would even want to use controversial figures as avatars...



_b_ #13 Posted 05 June 2017 - 03:13 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 54446 battles
  • 3,901
  • Member since:
    04-06-2011

Must admit I'd like to see this line implemented .... there are some tweaks on current in-game tanks as well a few unique ones that could fit nicely into wot :)

 

 



Enforcer1975 #14 Posted 05 June 2017 - 03:22 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 19736 battles
  • 10,249
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View Postsignal11th, on 05 June 2017 - 02:54 PM, said:

 

Nice to see a Mod that takes a active interest in the forum and doesn't go with the delete hammer straight away.

 

I remember posting something in this thread....but oh well...

signal11th #15 Posted 06 June 2017 - 08:46 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 34971 battles
  • 5,430
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011

View Postjabster, on 05 June 2017 - 02:07 PM, said:

 

Why wouldn't a mod just delete a thread that's obvious troll bait?

 

Well just because of the subject matter doesn't make it automatically a troll thread even if it was intended that way, from my perspective the above country probably has more justification for it's own tank tree than literally any of the others I have seen suggested so for me it's been useful to see the tree as the OP showed.

Edited by signal11th, 06 June 2017 - 08:47 AM.


UrQuan #16 Posted 06 June 2017 - 10:36 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 19173 battles
  • 6,027
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-19-2011

To add to this thread, here's a nice complementary variant, an Arabic tank tech tree (does have some copycats/tanks shared tho):

Spoiler

 

Was proposed in Armored Patrol first, as suggestion.

 

Also, regarding maps, some of those regions (Especially the Golan-height/plains) would make for an interesting WoT map idea imo.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users