Jump to content


Quickiebaby threatening seagulls in Emil II review


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
37 replies to this topic

qpranger #1 Posted 05 June 2017 - 05:24 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32524 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

Says he wants to throw stones at them.

Is this what we should expect from a CC,

threats of violence against wildlife?

SirFoch was removed for less.



Shivva #2 Posted 05 June 2017 - 05:27 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29800 battles
  • 1,958
  • [J_A_G] J_A_G
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012
Take his job qp!

Dundato #3 Posted 05 June 2017 - 05:29 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26318 battles
  • 715
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012
Its his name that offends me. Quickfingers/qickbaby. Sounds sexual to me. Disgusting. But hes a celebrity. So its not a issue

HassenderZerhacker #4 Posted 05 June 2017 - 05:45 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 27227 battles
  • 2,398
  • [1DPG] 1DPG
  • Member since:
    09-09-2015

View PostDundato, on 05 June 2017 - 05:29 PM, said:

Its his name that offends me. Quickfingers/qickbaby. Sounds sexual to me. Disgusting. But hes a celebrity. So its not a issue

 

lol

can't understand people who want to obliterate anything vaguely sex-related.

 



kripton69 #5 Posted 05 June 2017 - 05:51 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 1208 battles
  • 389
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    06-23-2016
Open a support ticket and copy the answer here. This is your chance to shine and be the voice of the community.

Edited by kripton69, 05 June 2017 - 05:51 PM.


Infine #6 Posted 05 June 2017 - 05:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18464 battles
  • 576
  • Member since:
    06-23-2011

View PostHassenderZerhacker, on 05 June 2017 - 09:45 PM, said:

 

lol

can't understand people who want to obliterate anything vaguely sex-related.

 

 

Eeeh. Envy is pretty simple.

250swb #7 Posted 05 June 2017 - 05:55 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22676 battles
  • 5,075
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015

View PostDundato, on 05 June 2017 - 05:29 PM, said:

Its his name that offends me. Quickfingers/qickbaby. Sounds sexual to me. Disgusting. But hes a celebrity. So its not a issue

 

Thinking sex is disgusting is something you may get over, or alternatively you take it further and turn weird. 

Strappster #8 Posted 05 June 2017 - 05:58 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 24145 battles
  • 9,019
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View Postqpranger, on 05 June 2017 - 04:24 PM, said:

Says he wants to throw stones at them.

Is this what we should expect from a CC,

threats of violence against wildlife?

SirFoch was removed for less.

 

I'd be more concerned about QB's mental health. Shouting at birds and/or throwing stones at them is often a sign of creeping senility and dementia, all the more reason to give his CC place to QP. I mean, they'd only have to change one letter in the abbreviation - it'd be daft not to.

Dundato #9 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26318 battles
  • 715
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012

View PostHassenderZerhacker, on 05 June 2017 - 04:45 PM, said:

 

lol

can't understand people who want to obliterate anything vaguely sex-related.

 

Well someone posted the other week saying he had to change his name as it was called hard. One rule for some it appears. But a suppose he is WG's celebrity shill. 



Erwin_Von_Braun #10 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:29 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38254 battles
  • 4,952
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

So, who is this 'Quickybaby' that you speak of?

 



Tidal_Force #11 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:34 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 16192 battles
  • 6,839
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-29-2012

Disgusting.

 

Cruelty towards animals is despicable. QB needs to pay for this. Year of full time unpaid work at animal shelter would be appropriate to teach him a lesson. Meanwhile, QP should take his position as Community Contributor. After all it's QP who just made us aware of QBs horrible conduct, such vigilance is exactly what we expect from CCs.



DorsVenabiIi #12 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:34 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23598 battles
  • 643
  • [BIBLE] BIBLE
  • Member since:
    03-31-2015

View PostDundato, on 05 June 2017 - 05:29 PM, said:

Its his name that offends me. Quickfingers/qickbaby. Sounds sexual to me. Disgusting. But hes a celebrity. So its not a issue

 

more like selloutshilleveryonespunchbagforwgsbullshitbaby. 

 

I don't like him that much, don't find him so entertaining, but people give him wayyy too much crap. Admit it, every one of you anti quickybaby warriors are [edited]subscribed to him.



Isharial #13 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:35 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 19826 battles
  • 2,352
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2015

View PostErwin_Von_Braun, on 05 June 2017 - 06:29 PM, said:

So, who is this 'Quickybaby' that you speak of?

 

 

a "community contributor".. cant say ive ever seen them in general chat trying to get people to stop being spammers there, ie, actually contributing to the efforts to calm chat down but what do I know? they must "contribute" to the sealclubbing of noobs....

 

they have their hand so far up WG's backside that their entire arm is covered....


 

watched one video of their play once.. cant say I was impressed at the language tbh


 

honestly, never give 1 person too much power, they abuse it


 



ZlatanArKung #14 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:36 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Threatening Seagulls?

I have my torch really for action!

Erwin_Von_Braun #15 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:43 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38254 battles
  • 4,952
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

View PostClarrissa_the_Third, on 05 June 2017 - 05:35 PM, said:

 

a "community contributor".. cant say ive ever seen them in general chat trying to get people to stop being spammers there, ie, actually contributing to the efforts to calm chat down but what do I know? they must "contribute" to the sealclubbing of noobs....

 

they have their hand so far up WG's backside that their entire arm is covered....


 

watched one video of their play once.. cant say I was impressed at the language tbh


 

honestly, never give 1 person too much power, they abuse it


 

 

tbh, I was aware - somehow I always fail to get sarcasm across in txt form.:)

I don't have a lot of time for these kind of players - nothing personal against them - I just find the idea of watching other people drive imaginary tanks a bit feeble.


 

And before anyone chimes in with 'you can learn a lot from someone like that' - maybe I could, I just don't want to be a sheep.

 



Erwin_Von_Braun #16 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:43 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38254 battles
  • 4,952
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

View PostZlatanArKung, on 05 June 2017 - 05:36 PM, said:

Threatening Seagulls?

I have my torch really for action!

 

Pitchfork sharpened?

Isharial #17 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:46 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 19826 battles
  • 2,352
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-19-2015

View PostErwin_Von_Braun, on 05 June 2017 - 06:43 PM, said:

 

tbh, I was aware - somehow I always fail to get sarcasm across in txt form.:)

I don't have a lot of time for these kind of players - nothing personal against them - I just find the idea of watching other people drive imaginary tanks a bit feeble.


 

And before anyone chimes in with 'you can learn a lot from someone like that' - maybe I could, I just don't want to be a sheep.

 

 

it really depends on the person.....

personally don't see the attraction to watching someone play a game that I could play myself and not be force fed it like im watching TV

however, others love TV...


 

you can only learn if you learn from watching

I learn better from actually playing the tank in question, than watching someone else play it


 

seems however everyone prefers watching these days... otherwise twitch etc.. wouldn't have 200+ gamers from every game out there streaming them failing or dying against a boss in the vain hope of teaching others how to (or not to) kill it



Erwin_Von_Braun #18 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:50 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38254 battles
  • 4,952
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

View PostClarrissa_the_Third, on 05 June 2017 - 05:46 PM, said:

 

it really depends on the person.....

personally don't see the attraction to watching someone play a game that I could play myself and not be force fed it like im watching TV

however, others love TV...


 

you can only learn if you learn from watching

I learn better from actually playing the tank in question, than watching someone else play it


 

seems however everyone prefers watching these days... otherwise twitch etc.. wouldn't have 200+ gamers from every game out there streaming them failing or dying against a boss in the vain hope of teaching others how to (or not to) kill it

 

Maybe it's a generational thing?

I'm going to take a leap of faith here and guess that you're a chap of 'advanced' years much like my good self? ;)



fighting_falcon93 #19 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:56 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 31233 battles
  • 3,919
  • Member since:
    02-05-2013

He threatened Seagull?

 

Trust me Steven will be back for revenge! :izmena:

 

 

:trollface:



Erwin_Von_Braun #20 Posted 05 June 2017 - 06:57 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38254 battles
  • 4,952
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

View Postfighting_falcon93, on 05 June 2017 - 05:56 PM, said:

He threatened Seagull?

 

Trust me Steven will be back for revenge! :izmena:

 

 

:trollface:

 

He's much fatter than that :trollface:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users