Jump to content


Fun vs money


  • Please log in to reply
60 replies to this topic

Poll: Fun vs money (156 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Are you happy with current shape of the game?

  1. game is absolutely brilliant - they did everything I wanted, I see no problems (4 votes [2.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.56%

  2. game is very good - they did most of what I wanted, problems are barely noticeable (10 votes [6.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.41%

  3. game is pretty OK - they did some of what I wanted, problems are acceptable (57 votes [36.54%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.54%

  4. game has serious issues - it's barely playable, I am not sure if I will continue to play (59 votes [37.82%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.82%

  5. game is broken - issues are unacceptable, I've stopped or will stop playing very soon (26 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

Did you spend any money on the game in the past?

  1. yes (145 votes [92.95%])

    Percentage of vote: 92.95%

  2. no (11 votes [7.05%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.05%

Do you spend any money on the game currently?

  1. yes (58 votes [37.18%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.18%

  2. no (98 votes [62.82%])

    Percentage of vote: 62.82%

Did you stop spending money in the game recently?

  1. yes (84 votes [53.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 53.85%

  2. no (72 votes [46.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.15%

Why did you stop spending money on the game?

  1. I didn't stop spending money (47 votes [10.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  2. it was too expensive (25 votes [5.32%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.32%

  3. it wasn't worth it (41 votes [8.72%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.72%

  4. not enough new features (10 votes [2.13%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.13%

  5. not enough new tanks (6 votes [1.28%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.28%

  6. not enough new maps (27 votes [5.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.74%

  7. I was bored (9 votes [1.91%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.91%

  8. I didn't like overpowered premium tanks (like Defender or Chrysler) (55 votes [11.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.70%

  9. I didn't like overpowered normal tanks (like Type 5 Heavy or Maus) (40 votes [8.51%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.51%

  10. I didn't like premium shells spam (37 votes [7.87%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.87%

  11. I didn't like SPG (25 votes [5.32%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.32%

  12. I didn't like new matchmaker (22 votes [4.68%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.68%

  13. I didn't like power creep (55 votes [11.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.70%

  14. I didn't like ignoring community feedback (55 votes [11.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.70%

  15. I didn't like something else (please elaborate in comment) (16 votes [3.40%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.40%

Would you spend more money on the game if you were more happy player?

  1. yes (120 votes [76.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 76.92%

  2. no (36 votes [23.08%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.08%

Are you willing to spend money on the game in future?

  1. absolutely yes - I love the game and will almost certainly continue to support it (15 votes [9.62%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.62%

  2. rather yes - I like the game and I am ready to support it, minor issues can be ignored (25 votes [16.03%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.03%

  3. I am not sure - I somewhat like the game, but not sure if it's worth my money (55 votes [35.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.26%

  4. rather no - they're not trying hard enough, I don't believe they can do it right (29 votes [18.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.59%

  5. absolutely not - they've ignored problems for too long (25 votes [16.03%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.03%

  6. absolutely not - I never spend money when I can play for free, no matter how good game it is (7 votes [4.49%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.49%

What could make you spending more money on the game?

  1. nothing (22 votes [6.65%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.65%

  2. lowering the prices (48 votes [14.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.50%

  3. increasing value for money (37 votes [11.18%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.18%

  4. taking community feedback seriously (78 votes [23.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.56%

  5. WarGaming acting more ethically (no legal threats, etc.) (36 votes [10.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.88%

  6. improving the game balance (96 votes [29.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 29.00%

  7. improving something else (please elaborate in comment) (14 votes [4.23%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.23%

Which of those are proper way to monetize the game?

  1. premium account (more exp and credits) (127 votes [16.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.71%

  2. garage slots (74 votes [9.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.74%

  3. personal reserves (short-time buffs to exp) (70 votes [9.21%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.21%

  4. visuals (camo, emblem, incriptions) (96 votes [12.63%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.63%

  5. overpowered premium tanks (like Chrysler or Defender) (16 votes [2.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.11%

  6. balanced premium tanks (like IS-3A, Rudy or STA-2) (89 votes [11.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.71%

  7. unrestricted premium shells (up to 100% ammo, no real drawback except price) (22 votes [2.89%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.89%

  8. restricted premium shells (like max 15% of shells and/or with damage drawback) (50 votes [6.58%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.58%

  9. training crew to 100% (71 votes [9.34%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.34%

  10. gold packs (74 votes [9.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.74%

  11. credits packs (60 votes [7.89%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.89%

  12. something else (please elaborate in comment) (11 votes [1.45%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.45%

Vote Hide poll

TsunamiFM #1 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:20 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18235 battles
  • 308
  • [SNAKE] SNAKE
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011

Hello everyone.

 

Let's start with some basic facts, to have proper context:

  1. WarGaming runs a business.
  2. Business needs to earn money.
  3. Happy players can spend more money on the game and/or bring more friends to play with them.
  4. Unhappy players can limit their spending on the game and/or move with their friends elsewhere.

 

So let's try to evaluate how happy we are at the moment, what could make us more happy, and how we would like to spend our money on the game without losing the fun. I strongly believe in win-win deals, so let's try to make this mutual benefit happening.



Witsdontlie #2 Posted 05 June 2017 - 10:55 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15388 battles
  • 243
  • Member since:
    08-12-2013
What are you, an internet marketing researcher? They severely reduced credit income and *Edited on anyone who gave them money for premium tanks in the past. No I'm not gonna touch any new prem ever. Anything else you wanted to know? 

Edited by Nohe21, 09 June 2017 - 08:44 AM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


ZlatanArKung #3 Posted 05 June 2017 - 11:46 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostTsunamiFM, on 05 June 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:

Hello everyone.

 

Let's start with some basic facts, to have proper context:

  1. WarGaming runs a business.
  2. Business needs to earn money.
  3. Happy players can spend more money on the game and/or bring more friends to play with them.
  4. Unhappy players can limit their spending on the game and/or move with their friends elsewhere.

 

So let's try to evaluate how happy we are at the moment, what could make us more happy, and how we would like to spend our money on the game without losing the fun. I strongly believe in win-win deals, so let's try to make this mutual benefit happening.

Well. It is,not like WG will care anyway...



TsunamiFM #4 Posted 05 June 2017 - 11:54 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18235 battles
  • 308
  • [SNAKE] SNAKE
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011

View PostWitsdontlie, on 05 June 2017 - 10:55 PM, said:

What are you, an internet marketing researcher? They severely reduced credit income and *Edited on anyone who gave them money for premium tanks in the past. No I'm not gonna touch any new prem ever. Anything else you wanted to know? 

 

Just a player who liked the game in the past, but isn't really happy about the direction it's going, especially the WG attitude towards the game balance.

 

I am pretty close to leaving the game, but before I do that wanted to try opening WG eyes to both problems that are bugging us, and possible win-win type solutions - that aren't really that far away. They just need to start listening and taking some actions, before it's too late.

 

@Hedgehog1963: nope, just trying to be unbiased and realistic :). WG doesn't care about anything but money, and in polls like this one we can tell them what they need to do to get it. Personally I am not paying a dime more until I see balance problems addressed, as this is key fun factor for me. But every player might have his own opinion on this - that's why the poll, not another rant.

 

@ZlatanArKung: they might be greedy, but they have to count money. Being too greedy often doesn't pay. It's about the same as Laffer curve - rising taxes too high cuts revenues. If we feel being pushed too much and robbed as players - we might simply stop paying.



TsunamiFM #5 Posted 06 June 2017 - 12:07 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18235 battles
  • 308
  • [SNAKE] SNAKE
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011

View PostHedgehog1963, on 05 June 2017 - 11:58 PM, said:

 

Please hit reply to my post if you want to have a forum conversation. This "@" doesn't work well.

 

No this poll is just another whine thread.  The forum does not represent the player base.

 

If you can do a poll on representative player base I'd gladly participate and/or see the results. I just did what I reasonably could. If they'll ignore it - well, there are some other games around. I like tanks, but I can live without it. And for sure I can spend money on other stuff than game studios blinded with greed.

Witsdontlie #6 Posted 06 June 2017 - 12:12 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 15388 battles
  • 243
  • Member since:
    08-12-2013

View PostTsunamiFM, on 05 June 2017 - 11:54 PM, said:

 

Just a player who liked the game in the past, but isn't really happy about the direction it's going, especially the WG attitude towards the game balance.

 

I am pretty close to leaving the game, but before I do that wanted to try opening WG eyes to both problems that are bugging us, and possible win-win type solutions - that aren't really that far away. They just need to start listening and taking some actions, before it's too late.

 

@Hedgehog1963: nope, just trying to be unbiased and realistic :). WG doesn't care about anything but money, and in polls like this one we can tell them what they need to do to get it. Personally I am not paying a dime more until I see balance problems addressed, as this is key fun factor for me. But every player might have his own opinion on this - that's why the poll, not another rant.

 

@ZlatanArKung: they might be greedy, but they have to count money. Being too greedy often doesn't pay. It's about the same as Laffer curve - rising taxes too high cuts revenues. If we feel being pushed too much and robbed as players - we might simply stop paying.

 

You have a very friendly tone, but you should be disillusioned instead of hoping that WG will listen to anything posted here except maybe outside of a dev Q & A. There's too many threads like yours around you're just nr. 230445424 making one. And the poll is too complex and lengthy for the average bum here but it's clear that you've thought a lot about it and care about the game. Being blunt, nothing but disappointment awaits you if you think that making these type of threads will stir up a discussion. You gotta make a creative/informative/funny one if you want it to stick around. 



Hedgehog1963 #7 Posted 06 June 2017 - 12:19 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 50139 battles
  • 6,921
  • [DIRTY] DIRTY
  • Member since:
    04-26-2011

View PostTsunamiFM, on 05 June 2017 - 11:07 PM, said:

 

If you can do a poll on representative player base I'd gladly participate and/or see the results. I just did what I reasonably could. If they'll ignore it - well, there are some other games around. I like tanks, but I can live without it. And for sure I can spend money on other stuff than game studios blinded with greed.

 

The only things they're interested in is how many people play how many games at what tier and how many people spent what amount of money today. They can see that and you can't.

 

Your poll is completely irrelevant.



TsunamiFM #8 Posted 06 June 2017 - 12:41 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18235 battles
  • 308
  • [SNAKE] SNAKE
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011

View PostWitsdontlie, on 06 June 2017 - 12:12 AM, said:

You have a very friendly tone, but you should be disillusioned instead of hoping that WG will listen to anything posted here except maybe outside of a dev Q & A. There's too many threads like yours around you're just nr. 230445424 making one. And the poll is too complex and lengthy for the average bum here but it's clear that you've thought a lot about it and care about the game. Being blunt, nothing but disappointment awaits you if you think that making these type of threads will stir up a discussion. You gotta make a creative/informative/funny one if you want it to stick around. 

 

Yeah, creating a "Will WarGaming build a moon base?" poll crossed my mind, but I resisted - they'll build it anyway ;P.

 

View PostHedgehog1963, on 06 June 2017 - 12:19 AM, said:

The only things they're interested in is how many people play how many games at what tier and how many people spent what amount of money today. They can see that and you can't.

 

Your poll is completely irrelevant.

 

Tomorrow turns into today at some point, isn't it? Polls like this might be not representative, but they might give them some early warnings.

 

So - maybe it's as you say, that majority of player base is so blind and willing to pay no matter what WG does, so WG can simply ignore our opinions here on the forum, and the poll is truly irrelevant. I have no idea, but I still feel we should say what we want - some game studios listen, and happy customer is usually good thing for the business.


Edited by TsunamiFM, 06 June 2017 - 12:46 AM.


Kaltroh #9 Posted 06 June 2017 - 01:26 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 46034 battles
  • 228
  • Member since:
    05-30-2015

View PostTsunamiFM, on 05 June 2017 - 10:20 PM, said:

Hello everyone.

 

Let's start with some basic facts, to have proper context:

  1. WarGaming runs a business.
  2. Business needs to earn money.
  3. Happy players can spend more money on the game and/or bring more friends to play with them.
  4. Unhappy players can limit their spending on the game and/or move with their friends elsewhere.

 

So let's try to evaluate how happy we are at the moment, what could make us more happy, and how we would like to spend our money on the game without losing the fun. I strongly believe in win-win deals, so let's try to make this mutual benefit happening.

 

I think this is a good and well prepared poll. Do not mind trolls.
 

Dundato #10 Posted 06 June 2017 - 01:29 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25657 battles
  • 663
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012
No im *Edited not happy

Edited by Nohe21, 09 June 2017 - 09:03 AM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


jack_timber #11 Posted 06 June 2017 - 10:04 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31165 battles
  • 1,600
  • Member since:
    07-26-2014

View PostKaltroh, on 06 June 2017 - 12:27 AM, said:

 

I think this is a good and well prepared poll. Do not mind trolls.

Agreed



dennez #12 Posted 06 June 2017 - 10:58 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 16745 battles
  • 4,755
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    02-26-2013
Your poll is too long and i lost interest halfway through.. Maybe a funny meme or cat gif in between the questions would help keeping me focused. 

Suurpolskija #13 Posted 06 June 2017 - 11:21 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 16552 battles
  • 1,182
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016
Well. I dislike the way it's going. I like the game but the new tanks trouble me. All the new moneygrabs trouble me.

I'm currently only paying for premium account, but I've been thinking of giving it up. New premium tanks are a big no.

Just had a friend give up the game because tier 4 tanks need too much grinding without premium and the tiers below that are horrible. A shame. Would have been nice to have more friends play the game but I guess new customers aren't that welcome.

Or should he just invest 30e into a f2p game straight away to progress in the first days?



TsunamiFM #14 Posted 06 June 2017 - 04:39 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18235 battles
  • 308
  • [SNAKE] SNAKE
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011

View PostSuurpolskija, on 06 June 2017 - 11:21 AM, said:

Well. I dislike the way it's going. I like the game but the new tanks trouble me. All the new moneygrabs trouble me.

I'm currently only paying for premium account, but I've been thinking of giving it up. New premium tanks are a big no.

Just had a friend give up the game because tier 4 tanks need too much grinding without premium and the tiers below that are horrible. A shame. Would have been nice to have more friends play the game but I guess new customers aren't that welcome.

Or should he just invest 30e into a f2p game straight away to progress in the first days?

 

Paying to speed up the game progress when you're happy with the game is pretty OK. But to be fair you should make your friend aware of game balance problems he can expect at higher tiers (like OP tanks or premium shells spammers) and WG attitude towards solving those problems, so he could re-think if that's the type of company he'd like to support.



Gleb_Reawer #15 Posted 06 June 2017 - 08:43 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28806 battles
  • 1,209
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011

Not happy at all.:izmena:

 

I won't be spending any money or time on WoT untill they change the tank balance. It seems the game has gone downhill since christmas, can't know for sure as I haven't really played, but I don't think it's even worth updating the game at this point to check out the changes to SPG & LT and what the RB is here.

 

P.S You can do that fancy "battles played" thing at me if you like, but woud you also be so kind as to add the date of my last battle in it? :honoring:



Erwin_Von_Braun #16 Posted 06 June 2017 - 09:16 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 36096 battles
  • 3,905
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014

View PostTsunamiFM, on 05 June 2017 - 07:20 PM, said:

Hello everyone.

 

Let's start with some basic facts, to have proper context:

  1. WarGaming runs a business.
  2. Business needs to earn money.
  3. Happy players can spend more money on the game and/or bring more friends to play with them.
  4. Unhappy players can limit their spending on the game and/or move with their friends elsewhere.

 

So let's try to evaluate how happy we are at the moment, what could make us more happy, and how we would like to spend our money on the game without losing the fun. I strongly believe in win-win deals, so let's try to make this mutual benefit happening.

 

I admire your forthrightness sir, but a win-win? I'm not so sure a thing exists for multiple parties - someone, somewhere is gonna lose.

Unfortunately, mutual benefit and compromise usually indicates a solution that neither side is happy with.


 

On the bright side, the only 'Other pls elaborate' that I ticked was 'Why Did I Stop Spending?'

Simple answer is 9.18 - more specifically, the cold blooded murder of some of my favourite tanks:izmena::(


 



BP_OMowe #17 Posted 06 June 2017 - 09:51 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 24731 battles
  • 2,047
  • [-GY-] -GY-
  • Member since:
    01-08-2013

View PostHedgehog1963, on 06 June 2017 - 05:52 AM, said:

*Edited

 

*Edited

 

View PostTsunamiFM, on 06 June 2017 - 12:41 AM, said:

I have no idea, but I still feel we should say what we want - some game studios listen, and happy customer is usually good thing for the business.

 

Indeed, although there is another important aspect to consider: do the company want a big buck now, or a sustainable income for several years?

Zynga Games took the former route, which made them the top dog of all failbook game developers. Constant powercreep forced them to close and launch games all the time, with an appalling customer service to boot. Eventually, the player base got fed up with Zynga's business practices, and today they have very little remaining.

King Digital Entertainment is still going strong though, with their Candy Crush Saga and derived games.

 

What I lack the most when it comes to Wargaming is none of the choices in the poll, but fundamental trust in the company. The Foch-debacle only high-lighted my reaction to the apology at last issued by WG, underscored by the deletion of the clan war history on these forums due to poor moderation, the constantly occurring sales of tanks withdrawn due to being over-powered, the broken promise to never sell the Mutant ever again, the whole scandal of automated banning abuse and so forth. Add to this WG reserving the right to termintate any account for any reason or no reason at all, and there is a very deep chasm to bridge.


Edited by Nohe21, 09 June 2017 - 09:08 AM.
*This post has been edited due to Off-Topic content


Homer_J #18 Posted 06 June 2017 - 10:36 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27068 battles
  • 27,695
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostTsunamiFM, on 05 June 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:

 

So let's try to evaluate how happy we are at the moment, 

 

WoT forum is never happy.  I don't need a poll for that.

 

Luckily WG incorporated a way to measure the happiness of the playerbase.  It's a big red button at the top of the game screen.  Every press of that button says "happy happy happy".  Keep on pressing it guys, it tells WG what a splendid job they are doing.


Edited by Homer_J, 06 June 2017 - 10:37 PM.


Morgaroth_ #19 Posted 06 June 2017 - 11:10 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 25929 battles
  • 69
  • Member since:
    11-11-2014

Ignore the haters, this poll is really well made tbh.

Back to the topic,

I have supported WG for a long time and bought many tanks, but I belive now it's the time to take a long break unless they really start taking the game balance more seriously.



Zeki #20 Posted 07 June 2017 - 12:50 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 4785 battles
  • 182
  • [-AWF-] -AWF-
  • Member since:
    04-19-2011

Let me elaborate on my answers:

 

1. It's pretty OK, but has some serious issues. It's not either A-OK, nor beyond self-destruction. If they would listen and URGENTLY fix the pay2win stuff it would be an awesome game, but they keep spamming new ways to make strong players stronger, which doesn't make any sense at all. Aside from that, the game's good.

 

2. Yes I did spend money in the past. Did I spend it 'currently'? Well I don't have PayPal open while I'm typing... Not sure what you mean, but I did pay recently for some stuff. I probably won't pay anything else soon because I'm afraid this game might lose all its value with the recent decisions.

 

3. I stopped spending money for many actual reasons, some weigh more than others:

 

- Recent decisions are making this game unstable and its fate uncertain. It definitely won't die, but the way things are going could mean spending real money in this game wouldn't be a wise choice, i.e. I may feel disencouraged to play it in the near future.

 

- The pay2win environment. The fact that premium ammo is definitely a pay2win method, the fact that some tanks are not balanced (whether they are too weak or too strong) or the fact that a certain % of the community supports pay2win mechanics. The worst part about the community supporting p2w is that the only supporters are all payers, many of them are probably too bad to keep a 50% winrate on even grounds, and they will stop paying if they can't win with their wallets... which means WG probably wants to please them at all costs. I'll never have enough time to explain how I raised my winrate the day I started paying for premium, just because I can now afford gold ammo.

 

- The matchmaking system. There are 4 types of games here:

  • Multiple tiers, top of the list. This is usually ridiculo​us. You kill stuff in 2 shots, what's the point? My 800 hp tank with 300 damage per shot vs that tank with 350hp that can't pierce my commander's hatch from the back. Boring games, and they give reduced XP.
  • Multiple tiers, middle of the list. Not the worst experience at least, probably the best for multi-tier matches... not much to say here, chances are some low tiers will suicide to teamkill out of boredom after the Nth game being bottom tier.
  • Multiple tiers, bottom of the list. Worst part of the multi-tier matchmaking. If you are stock, this gets even worse... and chances are you are going to play this way multiple times. I've had so many people suicide at the beginning by drowning, going AFK, or whatever just because it gets old and boring to be matched in a way where you are powerless compared to other tanks. Everything can be done of course, but it sucks when everything oneshots you and you take 10% of an enemy's life with each shell. I get why people suicide, I'm not even mad about it because it REALLY is boring, even if I'm the top tier and could carry it.
  • Single-tier. Best matchmaking. You know you are in fair grounds against anyone else, and it all comes down to how far upgraded your tank is compared to other players, plus the skill level. This is how every game should be IMO.

 

- The price tag on premium tanks. T8 premiums are on average 40€, which is far beyond the price tag they realistically deserve. I bought the Lorraine 40 t because I've spent a lot of time in this game and felt like contributing to it, but I probably won't pay as high as 40 bucks for a tank any more. To put it simple, this week I had to choose between buying a new tank (T-44-100 @ 44.99€;) or a game on release (Tekken 7 @ 37,70€;), hardly a dilemma. I could buy both, but I don't feel like wasting that much money right now. It's funny because I think premium time, camo, retraining, etc. are all fair prices for the luxuries, but premium tanks being gameplay factors gated behind real-money-only purchases... I don't think they are fine. I would even be happy to see I could buy premium tanks for some *Edited price, like 5M credits per tier. A tier 4 tank available for 2000g or 20M credits would make sense to some extent... but not 40€ as the only way to buy a tank.

 

- Credit overpricing. Because almost every single item is overpriced, people wait for a sale to stock up on everything they need, be it premium days, consumables, equipment or tanks from that line that get too expensive. Pretty much everything you can buy for credits, you are better off waiting for a sale to buy it.

 

- Lack of competitive environment. They just added ranked battles in beta mode with 7 years in business and players have yet to develop a metagame at most levels. At high level you will see most advanced strategies shine, but every game all the way up to T8 (The highest I can play so far) I see someone's always trying to YOLO die in the first minute, I've had many games where the team all-ins one side and a single tank goes the opposite way only to be destroyed 1v6, and similar stuff. I don't ask people to come with a pre-built mindset of where are they going, what square to take over in the first 30 seconds or what tank types to focus on every single match, but I wish there were no light tanks camping behind the SPGs for 6 minutes, no 15-man lemming trains with a team of 3 SPGs, no light tank campers, no heavy tanks behind the tank destroyers and, of course, no YOLO-rollers... Or at least understand you can't fight in the hills with -4º gun depression.

 

- Appalling matches. Those matches where you literally can do nothing for 8 straight minutes because both teams comprise 8 HTs that somehow managed to hull down in positions where whomever moves out of cover dies on either side, on either corner of the map, and the game stalls forever until someone decides to make the first move. If SPGs were made to stop this from happening I would be so happy, but instead I see myself one-shotting light tanks because it's so easy to predict their movement pattern and take them out in one shot as opposed to pelting heavies that it almost feels punishing to hit those heavies and help your team instead.

 

There are more reasons, but I'll keep the wall of text within reason.

 

4. As I said before, I'd spend more money, but it's uncertain where this goes so I'll play safe.

 

5. The true reasons to pay real money in this game and still be fair in my opinion are:

- Cosmetics. Everything you can call cosmetics (i.e. doesn't give gameplay advantage, only visuals) goes here.

- Permanent duration on item. That is for camo skins and stuff like that, where you can pay weekly with credits or a one-time payment with gold to get it forever. As long as the credit costs related to that are doable on a free account, that's great!

- Everything that can be bought with credits. Pretty much everything that can be bought with credits should be purchaseable with gold. Then again, as long as credit costs are balanced and sustainable on free accounts.

- Premium account time. Because it makes sense, premium accounts only save you time.

- Retraining crew and skills, then again it saves you time. Although I would add a credit cost for 100% retraining, even if it was 10 times the cost of the [ 90% skill ] or the [ 75% crew ].

- Premium tanks. Not only the tech tree ones, but also the ones on sale. Gold is real money converted to game currency anyway, so why can't I spend it on those tanks?

- Time savers: Convert free XP, buy credits, demount complex equipment, boosters and other stuff like that that saves you time, but doesn't really add anything to the game.

- Train female crew members. They are just normal crews with 2 skills, let us train some with gold? Still a time saver.

- Garage and barracks slots. Prime use of gold. PS: WG please bring a sale on those!

 

6. I would definitely spend more if they fixed the balance. I swear I'll buy something expensive the very day they make the game fair in terms of matchmaking (no T8 and T10 in the same match), no improved gear and no pay2win. Maybe I get a Fort Knox or a 100€ tank bundle, whatever comes first.

 

I only want to add one thing on top of this, if they were to add a matchmaking queue where it takes a little bit to find a match, but puts me ALWAYS in a single-tier battle, I'd go for it right now. If that has to be a different game mode like same-tier random battles, I'm all for it.


Edited by Nohe21, 09 June 2017 - 09:27 AM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users