Jump to content


Ranked battles - as predicted


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

Etre_ #1 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:21 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 52653 battles
  • 1,332
  • [WEBOB] WEBOB
  • Member since:
    04-21-2014
Yep, total credit sink. 

Yeah, I'm totally going to play 4h a day + a few more hours to grind credits. Is my ideea of fun and achievement in life. 

StronkiTonki #2 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:23 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Clan Commander
  • 30603 battles
  • 835
  • [T0AST] T0AST
  • Member since:
    05-27-2011
60k loss matches. Awesome.

Achibot #3 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:36 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17959 battles
  • 2,225
  • [HUSH-] HUSH-
  • Member since:
    05-16-2012
Playing Batchat, broken even so far. Not firing much gold though.

Nallic #4 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:38 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14463 battles
  • 565
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    11-25-2012
It's like random, but with double the gold and premium consumables.

Sfinski #5 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:39 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31717 battles
  • 2,622
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Haven't lost any credits. Just dont fire prem that much. 

Mastertenker #6 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 658 battles
  • 33
  • Member since:
    12-06-2014

Shot with HE higher damage less cost than premium ammo = win.

 

Well its a beta and its a game from the same people who put the WT E100 in the game, who overbuffed many tanks over the years, who wanted to change overmatch mechanics, until the community told them about the unnecessary buffs to many tanks with this change, they made the new T10 lights and now this. They are not able to think themselves, thats why its a beta, we have to tell them how stupid they are and what they have to change, if they are able to put away the vodka bottle and read the feedback.

 

I mean even rats learn from mistakes, after a few times they wouldn't touch the electrified cheese anymore, but human stupidity is infinite and this ones are very special.

 

Edit: I forgot they also put arty in the game and nerved/changed them multiple times and still didn't do it right.

 

Edit2: I forgot the feedback, WG should create a stackable premium acc. to let us counter the loss, you should be able to boost your premium bonus to 100% and more. The price of premium acc. should also double with every additional premium acc. bought. Its a win, win i tell ya.


Edited by Mastertenker, 05 June 2017 - 08:58 PM.


brumbarr #7 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:55 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012
Losign just as much credits as when I normaly play.

Etre_ #8 Posted 05 June 2017 - 08:55 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 52653 battles
  • 1,332
  • [WEBOB] WEBOB
  • Member since:
    04-21-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 05 June 2017 - 08:55 PM, said:

Losign just as much credits as when I normaly play.

 

You are special. We know.

DragonH19 #9 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 18613 battles
  • 862
  • [FE_PT] FE_PT
  • Member since:
    06-05-2012
RANKEDS is a fking GOLD AMMO fest, people who lack credits wont shoot them to enemys but the enemys will shot fking GOLF even tho if i am with a BC or STB or 50 armor tank......GOLD AMMO shouldnt be allowed on RANKED

signal11th #10 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:10 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 37093 battles
  • 5,707
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011

View PostDragonH19, on 05 June 2017 - 08:04 PM, said:

RANKEDS is a fking GOLD AMMO fest, people who lack credits wont shoot them to enemys but the enemys will shot fking GOLF even tho if i am with a BC or STB or 50 armor tank......GOLD AMMO shouldnt be allowed on RANKED

 

then everyone will play either the maus or the type 5.... crap mode that will probably die a death after 6 months,.,.

_snowfIake__ #11 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:12 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26606 battles
  • 635
  • Member since:
    08-16-2012
I like it. I am not doing that well but no pathetic whining bitches playing there. Only real men. Swearing and all and no one says report.

MattTheMiz #12 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:12 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 20138 battles
  • 324
  • [ARBK] ARBK
  • Member since:
    10-22-2011
crazy thing is that with maus i am always in top 3 lol 2 times even with <1k dmg :medal:

Etre_ #13 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:12 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 52653 battles
  • 1,332
  • [WEBOB] WEBOB
  • Member since:
    04-21-2014

View PostDragonH19, on 05 June 2017 - 09:04 PM, said:

RANKEDS is a fking GOLD AMMO fest, people who lack credits wont shoot them to enemys but the enemys will shot fking GOLF even tho if i am with a BC or STB or 50 armor tank......GOLD AMMO shouldnt be allowed on RANKED

 

Well , there are some normal games ... some is the key word. Because the majority consist E100/Mause/Type 5/"other TD abomination"

Suurpolskija #14 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:14 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18692 battles
  • 1,642
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016
Well, I finished my session tonight with 150k more credits than I started with. Didn't play much though. I seem to break even most matches anyways in tier10.

Kreshow #15 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:17 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 52548 battles
  • 105
  • Member since:
    10-14-2014
i tried to play normally - lost 6 in na row, loaded full gold plus premium consumables = 4 wins in a row... FOCH WAS RIGHT...

_Banana_Republic_ #16 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:23 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 42761 battles
  • 1,124
  • Member since:
    03-22-2015

Maybe firing 10 gold shells total to come to Rank III.

Games are much better at Rank II than usual Random games... thats cool.



Erwin_Von_Braun #17 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:25 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38254 battles
  • 4,952
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-25-2014
Some of us saw it coming..........................................:bush:

_b_ #18 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:33 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 55203 battles
  • 4,017
  • Member since:
    04-06-2011

been watching skill4ltu playing ... and must say the whine and dine of some here I haven't seen yet!? ...he just lucky then?

 



Nallic #19 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:53 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14463 battles
  • 565
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    11-25-2012

It's just a win streak counter really, there's nothing win skill based about it. The very essence of the system means that for a team to win another team must lose. Meaning that eventually you'll just yoyo in and out of ranks. This is a pretty logical conclusion, I'm not sure how WG didn't get to this.

 

It's about equally logical as the fact that a 3/5/7 MM requires vastly more players in the 7 than 3 group; for every 3 tier 10s we need 7 tier 8s. They are much more likely to get bottom tier.

 

Then again, guess we can't be surprised by this. Logic escapes them often these days.


Edited by Nallic, 05 June 2017 - 09:54 PM.


Etre_ #20 Posted 05 June 2017 - 09:54 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 52653 battles
  • 1,332
  • [WEBOB] WEBOB
  • Member since:
    04-21-2014

View Post_b_, on 05 June 2017 - 09:33 PM, said:

been watching skill4ltu playing ... and must say the whine and dine of some here I haven't seen yet!? ...he just lucky then?

 

 

Yeah, from what I noticed, when you go up the ranks more and more mediums and less armored HTs you meet. 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users