Jump to content


Is it me or is the new arty system worse ? ( i think its a rant ).


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
5 replies to this topic

Tinom5 #1 Posted 06 June 2017 - 07:14 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9643 battles
  • 488
  • [STAR-] STAR-
  • Member since:
    01-29-2014
To be fair when there was the old arty i didnt care yeah i rage sometimes but actually i did play it as a class too and to be fair it wasnt as bad as now. Now i dont have arty so i dont know what arty players feel but man am i raging more than before. It like all artys are FV304s ( they are the worst ). Getting pounded over and over  ( evenif you move because of the new splash radius ) i dont know what d oyou guys think am i wrong, is it really better for wot now ? :)

Hold_The_Door #2 Posted 06 June 2017 - 07:19 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 17663 battles
  • 869
  • Member since:
    03-29-2011
Image result for highlander kurgan meme

Tinom5 #3 Posted 06 June 2017 - 07:26 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9643 battles
  • 488
  • [STAR-] STAR-
  • Member since:
    01-29-2014

View PostHold_The_Door, on 06 June 2017 - 07:19 PM, said:

Image result for highlander kurgan meme

 

I dont get it but i laughed at  this :D

Aikl #4 Posted 06 June 2017 - 07:34 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 3,992
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

[I had a long reply, but the forum decided it wasn't having it.]

 

Lazy version: It's much better now, but still allows people to "have fun" punishing a single player for the whole game if it so wishes. Arty is implemented shitty in WoT, but this is somewhat close to what it should be. The correct approach would likely be to force artillery into a more 'active' role akin to the FV304, with shorter range, fair mobility, and forcing it to actually go where it wants to cover.

 

Risk and reward... that's the reason why a lot of players dislike the things.


Edited by Aikl, 06 June 2017 - 07:40 PM.


Tinom5 #5 Posted 06 June 2017 - 07:54 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9643 battles
  • 488
  • [STAR-] STAR-
  • Member since:
    01-29-2014

View PostAikl, on 06 June 2017 - 07:34 PM, said:

[I had a long reply, but the forum decided it wasn't having it.]

 

Lazy version: It's much better now, but still allows people to "have fun" punishing a single player for the whole game if it so wishes. Arty is implemented shitty in WoT, but this is somewhat close to what it should be. The correct approach would likely be to force artillery into a more 'active' role akin to the FV304, with shorter range, fair mobility, and forcing it to actually go where it wants to cover.

 

Risk and reward... that's the reason why a lot of players dislike the things.

 

I guess... but look how AW made it with the problem. If you are an artilery player and shoot the enemy arty knows your possition for like 5 sec. and then you have to reloacate. Evne now arty in wot can stay.

Asklepi0s #6 Posted 07 June 2017 - 08:58 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 4964 battles
  • 797
  • [WG_M] WG_M
  • Member since:
    01-23-2017
Due to the high number of Artillery threads, we want discussions to take place in the main pinned threadhere.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users