Jump to content


July TOTT


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

antoine130 #1 Posted 06 June 2017 - 10:30 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6312 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    09-05-2012
Object 140 month. Good job, community, with your thinking it's no wonder WG are such 4ssholes themself! You don't deserve any better! I hope they give us even more game breaking tanks, you bloody hypocrites.

Edited by antoine130, 06 June 2017 - 10:30 PM.


Spurtung #2 Posted 06 June 2017 - 10:34 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63853 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

Right.

 

So, TVP was the first one voted. In the meantime we've had batchat, E50M, leop1. Considering it's only one ToTT a month, and other classes have been voted as well, what exactly is the problem here?



antoine130 #3 Posted 06 June 2017 - 10:43 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6312 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    09-05-2012

View PostSpurtung, on 06 June 2017 - 10:34 PM, said:

Right.

 

So, TVP was the first one voted. In the meantime we've had batchat, E50M, leop1. Considering it's only one ToTT a month, and other classes have been voted as well, what exactly is the problem here?

 

Why not T-62A, CAX, AMX30B?

Spurtung #4 Posted 06 June 2017 - 11:00 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63853 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postantoine130, on 06 June 2017 - 10:43 PM, said:

 

Why not T-62A, CAX, AMX30B?

 

Because, upon given the choice to vote, players voted on other tanks. Seems pretty straight-forward... 

Archaean #5 Posted 06 June 2017 - 11:08 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15179 battles
  • 1,181
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

I don't see why people are hypocrites for voting for the Obj. 140. The Tanks that wargaming give as are only as OP as the player allows it, there are some tanks that increase the winrate of a certain individual, but that doesn't change fact that a bad player will be a bad player in a good tank.

 

Look at me. I'm a crapplayer and I perform crapin the russian meds. I can count as a prime example!



ZorzDePaloma #6 Posted 06 June 2017 - 11:16 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38301 battles
  • 222
  • [DBWS] DBWS
  • Member since:
    04-02-2013
I personally don't have Obj 140, but I agree with OP. Repeating TOTT is annoying. Less popular tanks are not getting their chance to get in TOTT. So if I need some of these tanks I will have to play for at least 5 more years to be sure to buy them. It is more efficient to me to grind 6.1M credits than to wait for 3 years for example to get a tank -30%. And you will get medium tank tott like this: Obj 140, other, T-62, other, Obj 430, other, Obj 140 (last chosen 6 months ago, so why not again), other, T-62, other, Obj 430...

Spurtung #7 Posted 06 June 2017 - 11:24 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63853 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostZorzDePaloma, on 06 June 2017 - 11:16 PM, said:

I personally don't have Obj 140, but I agree with OP. Repeating TOTT is annoying.

How can it be repeated if it was never voted before?

 

View PostZorzDePaloma, on 06 June 2017 - 11:16 PM, said:

Less popular tanks are not getting their chance to get in TOTT.

Literally, the less popular tanks had a voting of their own last month, where Type 5 got the most votes.

 

"This time, we mixed it up a little to give the underdogs a fighting chance: log in to your account on the website, and make sure to cast your vote for one of the Tier X vehicles that got the least amount of votes in the past editions of the special!"

 

 

 

View PostZorzDePaloma, on 06 June 2017 - 11:16 PM, said:

And you will get medium tank tott like this: Obj 140, other, T-62, other, Obj 430, other, Obj 140 (last chosen 6 months ago, so why not again), other, T-62, other, Obj 430...

Indeed. In fact, it all started right on the first MT vote, where TVP T50/51 was ToTT in May 2016.

Then, next time MTs where getting voted, E50M won, in August 2016.

After that, BC25t, in November 2016.

Next, Leopard 1, April 2017.

 

As you can see, it sure has been following your enlightened and informed formula.


Edited by Spurtung, 06 June 2017 - 11:41 PM.


kripton69 #8 Posted 06 June 2017 - 11:24 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 1208 battles
  • 389
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    06-23-2016

Tbh I don't even mind it. I think the tier 10 tech tree Russian meds are in decline in randoms. I guess the 907 is the exception but it's a reward tank anyway. I would've once agreed that they need a nerf but I think this power creep has hit them pretty hard and they are well balanced mediums now. And mediums in general seem to be pretty bad at tier 10 now because the metagame favors the broken super heavies and at tier 10 it's common with the new matchmaker to see those horrible battles where both teams have lots of armored heavies. In many maps that's a death sentence for a low alpha medium. 

 

It makes more sense to play tier 9 if you want to play mediums. The playing style is exactly the same, you are never bottom tier and the worst case scenario is 5 tier X tanks in both teams which means you rarely meet more than 1-2 tier X super heavies.


Edited by kripton69, 06 June 2017 - 11:25 PM.


antoine130 #9 Posted 07 June 2017 - 12:14 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 6312 battles
  • 436
  • Member since:
    09-05-2012

View Postkripton69, on 06 June 2017 - 11:24 PM, said:

Tbh I don't even mind it. I think the tier 10 tech tree Russian meds are in decline in randoms. I guess the 907 is the exception but it's a reward tank anyway. I would've once agreed that they need a nerf but I think this power creep has hit them pretty hard and they are well balanced mediums now. And mediums in general seem to be pretty bad at tier 10 now because the metagame favors the broken super heavies and at tier 10 it's common with the new matchmaker to see those horrible battles where both teams have lots of armored heavies. In many maps that's a death sentence for a low alpha medium. 

 

It makes more sense to play tier 9 if you want to play mediums. The playing style is exactly the same, you are never bottom tier and the worst case scenario is 5 tier X tanks in both teams which means you rarely meet more than 1-2 tier X super heavies.

 



thestaggy #10 Posted 07 June 2017 - 09:28 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14906 battles
  • 1,939
  • Member since:
    04-24-2015
I wanted the CAX, but seeing as I could unlock the T-54 soon it isn't bad either.

Edited by thestaggy, 07 June 2017 - 10:47 AM.


Bora_BOOM #11 Posted 07 June 2017 - 09:52 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 22701 battles
  • 2,956
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

Vladimir, prepare the T-54. :honoring:

Igor, get them heat shells. :justwait:

We will share some ruski love and try to balance japs and scare of the mice. :izmena:



Spurtung #12 Posted 07 June 2017 - 10:26 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63853 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013
Had a 140 bouncing my type 5 while over angling. That was fun.

Edited by Spurtung, 07 June 2017 - 10:28 AM.


Ceeb #13 Posted 07 June 2017 - 10:57 AM

    Major General

  • Beta Tester
  • 30268 battles
  • 5,260
  • [BULL] BULL
  • Member since:
    01-14-2011

Already have the 140.... but I'll take the 50 wins to get the 300% resources. 

 

Was hoping the STB 1 would get voted. 



Suurpolskija #14 Posted 07 June 2017 - 11:02 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18692 battles
  • 1,642
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016
Too bad it's (currently) random battles only. I might actually like to get those wins in the ranked battle.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users