Jump to content

Vote about Bonds, how do YOU feel?

poll bonds

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

Poll: Poll about Bonds... (42 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Will you play ranked battles to earn bonds?

  1. Yes, I want to make my tanks OP and get 3k DPM in tier 6 and stat pad. (10 votes [23.81%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.81%

  2. Yes, I want to be able to keep up with other people that makes their tanks OP.. (6 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  3. No, I don't have enough time to play it. (6 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  4. No, I hate the idea of bonds and it is too frustrating to achieve. (12 votes [28.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.57%

  5. Yes (for other reasons) (3 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  6. No (for other reasons) (5 votes [11.90%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.90%

Quick summary, Will you play ranked battles? Simple Yes/No.

  1. Yes. (22 votes [52.38%])

    Percentage of vote: 52.38%

  2. No. (20 votes [47.62%])

    Percentage of vote: 47.62%

Improved Equipment should only be available to use in ranked battles, not random battles.

  1. I agree. (23 votes [54.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 54.76%

  2. I disagree. (14 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

  3. No idea / Other answer (5 votes [11.90%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.90%

Vote Hide poll

anonym_YNch2j0j5oJ9 #1 Posted 09 June 2017 - 08:34 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 689
  • Member since:

The tier 6 Russian medium, A43, can get 3k DPM, with the best possible skills and improved equipment, 3k dpm, at tier 6... It can kill a fullhp KV2 in 15 seconds about...

WG forces the players to play ranked battles, because if they don't, everyone else will simply be much better than you, a whole 1-2 shots less per minute in obj140 for example, less than 5 second reload, for 264 pen and 320 dmg....

If you don't play ranked = you will constantly be worse than your teammates, and most importantly, your enemies.

And all those new players, possible WoT addict players in the future, they will uninstall the game before they get tier 6 even, because of all the lower tier stat padding that will happen.. 

Personally I won't play ranked battles, because the games are too frustrating.. bonds are so damn stupid... it will really ruin random battles forever, unless WG fix this mess (which they won't, obviously..)

I really wish I could delete this game but my laptop is too terrible to play any other game -.- and I have some really nice friends in WoT that I don't want to leave

Suurpolskija #2 Posted 09 June 2017 - 08:38 PM


  • Player
  • 18708 battles
  • 1,642
  • Member since:
Well, Sean Connery was clearly the best, but I also like the new ones and I'm sad to see D. Craig go.

T.Dalton was prolly worst and Brosnan was better at singing than acting, though must say that movie where he grew a beard as a Bond had drama written all over it by the standards of old Bonds.

Alabamatick #3 Posted 09 June 2017 - 09:00 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 31849 battles
  • 3,178
  • Member since:
No, i'm not the slightest bit interested in a ranked mode, or tier 10

Jigabachi #4 Posted 09 June 2017 - 10:11 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 19,942
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:

The poll is rather bad.

I don't have a tX and I'm not very interested in getting one. And even if I was, it would still take a long time for me...

Besides that, I simply don't care about that gamemode, simply because it's tX only.

I also don't really care about that "premium" equipment. Everyone can get it and the balance of the game is fubar anyway.

Aikl #5 Posted 09 June 2017 - 10:28 PM


  • Player
  • 26504 battles
  • 4,349
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
How do I feel, well, thanks for asking...



Oh. Bonds. Rather indifferent, to be honest. Gonna grind the Batchat gun in ranked battles because I can. Not playing competitive, so it would be a ton of frustration and work just for increasing the DPM on E-25 ~2,5%. :rolleyes:

Strappster #6 Posted 09 June 2017 - 10:37 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25957 battles
  • 10,151
  • Member since:

I'm not playing ranked battles because I don't have any tier 10 tanks. I'm most likely to get the WZ-132-1 first as I'm currently grinding the WZ-132A and everything I've read about ranked highlights the futility of playing a light tank in that mode so I probably won't play it when I do have a tier 10.


I agree that improved equipment should be limited to use in ranked battles on the basis that that's where it's earned but as the improved bonuses are so low, I'm not going to be upset about it. I get out-played on a regular basis by players in regular tanks; crying that it wouldn't have happened except for a 2.5% bonus the other guy had is ridiculous.

Nishi_Kinuyo #7 Posted 09 June 2017 - 10:38 PM


  • Player
  • 8050 battles
  • 4,900
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:

I think someone is grossly overexeggerating the problem.

Did you even check how much time involvement it takes to even get a single piece of improved equipment?

When you can just use food and get a slightly better benefit compared to no food and 3 improved equipments.


Also, Sean Connery, followed by Roger Moore.

Edited by Nishi_Kinuyo, 09 June 2017 - 11:11 PM.

qpranger #8 Posted 09 June 2017 - 10:47 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 34479 battles
  • 5,217
  • Member since:

I know that probably no one will agree with me,

as usual, but my favourite bond is George Lazenby.

Also tagged with poll, bonds

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users