Jump to content


wg is dying?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
24 replies to this topic

justimusprime #1 Posted 14 June 2017 - 10:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 33836 battles
  • 18
  • [ORZY] ORZY
  • Member since:
    08-18-2011
https://thearmoredpa...ng-dissolution/

Enforcer1975 #2 Posted 14 June 2017 - 10:57 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 18361 battles
  • 9,840
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
Brexit...

Dundato #3 Posted 14 June 2017 - 11:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 25653 battles
  • 663
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012
Braw hopefully not long then

Phobos4321 #4 Posted 14 June 2017 - 11:03 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 42812 battles
  • 7,814
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

everything is dying from the day of its birth

 

how many time did wow died already ?

 

even for WoT -

"its gone die when WT GF comes out" well not happened its more like WT GF dying 

"its gone die when AW comes out" well not happened its AW thats dying (fast)

 

 

thought perhaps wg plans to end WoT 1 going WoT 2 and do a finally excessive milking right now

 

 

if they sell the type 59 again you know the game is gonna end soon ...



Plasma_Fire #5 Posted 14 June 2017 - 11:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19374 battles
  • 722
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011

Looks like a classic case to me.
They remove the funds from the company into others and then file for bankruptcy, So they can legitimatly close the company without any long winded and costly explanations.

There is no real downside to the company as it is still going as strong as it ever was, its a good way to put all earnings into a more private light.

 

As a global entity WG would actually be better off being based in the UK after Brexit, being part of the EU isnt all it is cracked up to be which is why the UK is leaving and almost none of the companies registered in the UK plan to leave it, London will remain as one of thee strongest places to be in the world. Companies like RyanAir operate on a shoe  string budget will leave the UK as they require the support the EU gives them, the strong alone fear less.

 

Short version is WG doesnt like to tell people how much money its making and they have found a legal way to get out of telling people.

It isnt a poor company.



BravelyRanAway #6 Posted 14 June 2017 - 11:39 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22194 battles
  • 8,090
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostPlasma_Fire, on 14 June 2017 - 10:09 PM, said:

Companies like RyanAir operate on a shoe  string budget will leave the UK as they require the support the EU gives them, the strong alone fear less.

Errh....RyanAir is an Irish company...with it's headquarters as always.....in Dublin, Republic of Ireland......hate to burst your bubble. 

We will let you have Barry McGuigan as his voice is annoying.....even though he is from Monaghan....in the Republic of Ireland.

You can definitely keep Sir Bob Geldolf....from Dublin.........cringe factor not wanted.



Phobos4321 #7 Posted 15 June 2017 - 01:39 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 42812 battles
  • 7,814
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

View PostPlasma_Fire, on 14 June 2017 - 11:09 PM, said:

Looks like a classic case to me.
They remove the funds from the company into others and then file for bankruptcy, So they can legitimatly close the company without any long winded and costly explanations.

There is no real downside to the company as it is still going as strong as it ever was, its a good way to put all earnings into a more private light.

 

As a global entity WG would actually be better off being based in the UK after Brexit, being part of the EU isnt all it is cracked up to be which is why the UK is leaving and almost none of the companies registered in the UK plan to leave it, London will remain as one of thee strongest places to be in the world. Companies like RyanAir operate on a shoe  string budget will leave the UK as they require the support the EU gives them, the strong alone fear less.

 

Short version is WG doesnt like to tell people how much money its making and they have found a legal way to get out of telling people.

It isnt a poor company.

 

good joke i loled

Plasma_Fire #8 Posted 15 June 2017 - 01:46 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19374 battles
  • 722
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 14 June 2017 - 11:39 PM, said:

Errh....RyanAir is an Irish company...with it's headquarters as always.....in Dublin, Republic of Ireland......hate to burst your bubble. 

We will let you have Barry McGuigan as his voice is annoying.....even though he is from Monaghan....in the Republic of Ireland.

You can definitely keep Sir Bob Geldolf....from Dublin.........cringe factor not wanted.

 

Sorry I didnt mean to imply they are headquartered in the UK.
What I mean is once the UK leaves the EU companies like RyanAir will move a lot of their supporting infrastructure that is based in the UK to the EU because it will be cheaper to operate it within the EU.

 

In the long term the UK will be better off out of the EU.

 

Will the 6 counties be leaving I wonder... 



rado84 #9 Posted 15 June 2017 - 02:03 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18541 battles
  • 295
  • [BGSF] BGSF
  • Member since:
    08-23-2012

View PostPhobos4321, on 15 June 2017 - 12:03 AM, said:

"its gone die when AW comes out" well not happened its AW thats dying (fast)

 

AW is dying because FG made sure of that and currently they control every aspect of Armored Warfare. Not long ago I found an article advertising one could get 2500 gold on WOT, if they unlock a tier 6 vehicle on Armored Warfare. That only serves as an evidence that FG has sealed the faith of AW, only to promote "World of Sci-Fi physics".



RamRaid90 #10 Posted 15 June 2017 - 07:53 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19672 battles
  • 5,847
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View Postrado84, on 15 June 2017 - 01:03 AM, said:

 

Not long ago I found an article advertising one could get 2500 gold on WOT, if they unlock a tier 6 vehicle on Armored Warfare.

 

A lie.



BIGMRCINA #11 Posted 15 June 2017 - 08:04 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 67806 battles
  • 150
  • Member since:
    12-01-2011
no its not a lie its true but i didnt make it on time for this gold.

250swb #12 Posted 15 June 2017 - 08:05 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 20777 battles
  • 4,576
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
What baffles me is how the OP can link to an article that implicitly suggests WG is a very long way from dying and then come up with the title 'wg is dying?' WG simply don't want anybody to know how much money they earn, hence winding up administrative shell companies.

Edited by 250swb, 15 June 2017 - 08:09 AM.


Frostilicus #13 Posted 15 June 2017 - 08:07 AM

    Major

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 22401 battles
  • 2,741
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011

View Post250swb, on 15 June 2017 - 07:05 AM, said:

What baffles me is how the OP can link to an article that implicitly suggests WG is a very long way from dying and then come up with the title 'wg is dying?'

 

Wishful thinking, or a complete inability to read and comprehend, Op - take your pick :)

MrClark56 #14 Posted 15 June 2017 - 08:10 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 5693 battles
  • 2,312
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013
yes yes.... WG is indeed dying..... to sell us more OP premium tanks and make millions Euros profit....

RamRaid90 #15 Posted 15 June 2017 - 08:15 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19672 battles
  • 5,847
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostBIGMRCINA, on 15 June 2017 - 07:04 AM, said:

no its not a lie its true but i didnt make it on time for this gold.

 

Yet nobody else saw this article, it cannot be found anywhere ... etc etc. It didn't exist, AW could not advertise free gold for another game which they don't own the rights to in exchange for playign their own version of the same game. WG would have sued them into extinction.

gpalsson #16 Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:03 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 22107 battles
  • 8,117
  • Member since:
    04-13-2013

WG has been dying since launch I believe.

At least every month since I started looking at this forum: "WoT Is dying!!!11oneone".



jabster #17 Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:06 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12516 battles
  • 21,670
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View Postgpalsson, on 15 June 2017 - 08:03 AM, said:

WG has been dying since launch I believe.

At least every month since I started looking at this forum: "WoT Is dying!!!11oneone".

 

I believe it's died at least six times due to the release of a game already.

AliceUnchained #18 Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:59 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 37820 battles
  • 8,521
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

View Postjabster, on 15 June 2017 - 09:06 AM, said:

 

I believe it's died at least six times due to the release of a game already.

 

Even female Orcs in chain mail bikini's couldn't keep players away... Or was that expansion not yet released for WoW?

ZlatanArKung #19 Posted 15 June 2017 - 10:06 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostPlasma_Fire, on 14 June 2017 - 11:09 PM, said:

Looks like a classic case to me.
They remove the funds from the company into others and then file for bankruptcy, So they can legitimatly close the company without any long winded and costly explanations.

There is no real downside to the company as it is still going as strong as it ever was, its a good way to put all earnings into a more private light.

 

As a global entity WG would actually be better off being based in the UK after Brexit, being part of the EU isnt all it is cracked up to be which is why the UK is leaving and almost none of the companies registered in the UK plan to leave it, London will remain as one of thee strongest places to be in the world. Companies like RyanAir operate on a shoe  string budget will leave the UK as they require the support the EU gives them, the strong alone fear less.

 

Short version is WG doesnt like to tell people how much money its making and they have found a legal way to get out of telling people.

It isnt a poor company.

 

London viability is somewhat connected to which deals UK gets with EU and what taxes they might/might not change.

 

Until this is solved, there is no reason to move from UK  I think. Because you don't know how brexit will effect your company.



StinkyStonky #20 Posted 15 June 2017 - 10:18 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25099 battles
  • 1,654
  • [H5VOC] H5VOC
  • Member since:
    11-02-2015

It's interesting how the WG Shills in the comments to the article completely distract the discussion away from WG and towards the author.

I suspect that most of the "were are your tax returns, are you a coward too" commentators are all WG staffers.

 

Block Quote

 Market participants believe that this decision was made in order to not disclose the company’s financial statements anymore.

 There's your answer right there.

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users