Jump to content


Valkyria chronicles tank poll


  • Please log in to reply
221 replies to this topic

Poll: Valkyria chronicles tanks. (273 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Do you want tanks like these in the game (ignoring their performance)

  1. No (187 votes [68.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 68.50%

  2. Yes (54 votes [19.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 19.78%

  3. I dont care. (32 votes [11.72%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.72%

Would you buy these tanks if they came into the game ( ignoring their performance)

  1. Yes because I like the look/voices/crew (35 votes [12.82%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.82%

  2. Yes because I buy most/all premium tanks. (11 votes [4.03%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.03%

  3. No because I dont like the look of the tank/they dont fit the game. (150 votes [54.95%])

    Percentage of vote: 54.95%

  4. I wouldnt buy any other premium tanks anyway. (23 votes [8.42%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.42%

  5. No for another reason. (44 votes [16.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.12%

  6. Yes for another reason. (10 votes [3.66%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.66%

If yes, would you be fine with a mod that looks/sounds/same crew. As this tank?

  1. Yes (40 votes [14.65%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.65%

  2. No (62 votes [22.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.71%

  3. I voted No on the previous question. (171 votes [62.64%])

    Percentage of vote: 62.64%

If tanks like this where introduced, would you quit the game? ( ignoring their performance)

  1. No (41 votes [46.07%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.07%

  2. Yes (13 votes [14.61%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.61%

  3. No, but I would not spend money anymore. (16 votes [17.98%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.98%

  4. No, but I would play it less. (19 votes [21.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.35%

Vote Hide poll

brumbarr #1 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:09 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,299
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

A poll to see what the community actually thinks of it. I tried to make the poll as neutral as possible.

If anything is wrong with it. Pls tell me.

 

Sorry for another thread on this topic, but noone made a good poll on this topic yet and  there seems to be disagreement on whether the community wants this or not.

 

EDIT: here is how these tanks look like for those that do not know:

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

 


Edited by brumbarr, 20 June 2017 - 03:27 PM.


Search_Warrant #2 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:15 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26010 battles
  • 5,341
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

"Do you want tanks like these in the game (ignoring their performance)"

 

While i do want them in game. i DO take performance into consideration, a tank could look amazing, but if it ruins game balance, id rather it not be in game.

Reason i want Edelweiss in game. but not Nameless.



CptBarney #3 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:15 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18915 battles
  • 3,921
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013

well I casted my vote, I voted yes since I don't mind them being in the regardless if they are Japanese cartoon tanks or not. just nerf the bloody nameless.

 

that and I don't have a tier 8 premium tank for Japanese line, but then you cant swap the crews out and I like the way the edelweiss plays seems to be a very good flanker and ambush tank.


 

but I doubt they will get added in anyways.



brumbarr #4 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:16 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,299
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 19 June 2017 - 05:15 PM, said:

"Do you want tanks like these in the game (ignoring their performance)"

 

While i do want them in game. i DO take performance into consideration, a tank could look amazing, but if it ruins game balance, id rather it not be in game.

Reason i want Edelweiss in game. but not Nameless.

 

thats why I said ignore their performance, I want to now the options for the visuals.

Grand_Moff_Tano #5 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:17 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1273 battles
  • 10,424
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostCptBarney, on 19 June 2017 - 04:15 PM, said:

well I casted my vote, I voted yes since I don't mind them being in the regardless if they are Japanese cartoon tanks or not. just nerf the bloody nameless.

 

that and I don't have a tier 8 premium tank for Japanese line, but then you cant swap the crews out and I like the way the edelweiss plays seems to be a very good flanker and ambush tank.


 

but I doubt they will get added in anyways.

 

This is Wargaming.net, word on the street is if there is money to be made then they will sell them :P

Enforcer1975 #6 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:18 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 18508 battles
  • 9,857
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

I want another choice that answers all 3 poll questions at once.

- Not at the current state of gamebalance.


Edited by Enforcer1975, 19 June 2017 - 05:19 PM.


brumbarr #7 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:19 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,299
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 19 June 2017 - 05:17 PM, said:

 

This is Wargaming.net, word on the street is if there is money to be made then they will sell them :P

 

Inb4 this poll backfires on me and  they see they are wanted and actually introduce them :p

Unkel_Dolan #8 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:20 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 24393 battles
  • 2,685
  • [NOPAN] NOPAN
  • Member since:
    12-14-2010
day 1 buy for the Edelweiss

LaManche #9 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:20 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18542 battles
  • 476
  • [3EGS] 3EGS
  • Member since:
    03-31-2014
They already said no, what's the point of throwing more Edited at each other in another thread about the same thing?

Edited by Asklepi0s, 20 June 2017 - 03:38 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks


Grand_Moff_Tano #10 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:20 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1273 battles
  • 10,424
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View Postbrumbarr, on 19 June 2017 - 04:19 PM, said:

 

Inb4 this poll backfires on me and  they see they are wanted and actually introduce them :p

 

I knew there was a reason I voted yes other than actually wanting them :D
 

View PostLaManche, on 19 June 2017 - 04:20 PM, said:

They already said no, what's the point of throwing more sh*t at each other in another thread about the same thing?

 

No doesn't mean never.
 

Folau #11 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:21 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 15254 battles
  • 2,557
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 19 June 2017 - 04:19 PM, said:

 

Inb4 this poll backfires on me and  they see they are wanted and actually introduce them :p

 



CptBarney #12 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:23 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18915 battles
  • 3,921
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 19 June 2017 - 04:17 PM, said:

 

This is Wargaming.net, word on the street is if there is money to be made then they will sell them :P

 

 

true I wouldn't be surprised. and I doubt they will nerf the nameless before they (if they) release them here on the eu and na servers.


 

r.i.p meh tiger 2 :,3



brumbarr #13 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:23 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,299
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostFolau, on 19 June 2017 - 05:21 PM, said:

 

 

But I though WG didnt listen to feedback, so  should be fine right?

or do they only listen to feedback that makes them money?

hmm...



brumbarr #14 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:24 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,299
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostLaManche, on 19 June 2017 - 05:20 PM, said:

They already said no, what's the point of throwing more Edited at each other in another thread about the same thing?

 

The point is to not throw Edited at eachother and just see what people think isntead of guessing.

Edited by Asklepi0s, 20 June 2017 - 03:39 PM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks


Folau #15 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:26 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 15254 battles
  • 2,557
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 19 June 2017 - 04:23 PM, said:

 

But I though WG didnt listen to feedback, so  should be fine right?

or do they only listen to feedback that makes them money?

hmm...

 

Inb4 WG turns over a new leaf in PR/comms, and one of the Devs makes it their personal mission to obey the community on this issue.

 

Perhaps hell will freeze over too, though based on how warm the office is I'm not sure there is enough thermal energy in the universe to also maintain hell.



brumbarr #16 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:27 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,299
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostFolau, on 19 June 2017 - 05:26 PM, said:

 

Inb4 WG turns over a new leaf in PR/comms, and one of the Devs makes it their personal mission to obey the community on this issue.

 

Perhaps hell will freeze over too, though based on how warm the office is I'm not sure there is enough thermal energy in the universe to also maintain hell.

 

We are doomed arent we?

Grand_Moff_Tano #17 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:27 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1273 battles
  • 10,424
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View PostFolau, on 19 June 2017 - 04:26 PM, said:

 

Inb4 WG turns over a new leaf in PR/comms, and one of the Devs makes it their personal mission to obey the community on this issue.

 

Perhaps hell will freeze over too, though based on how warm the office is I'm not sure there is enough thermal energy in the universe to also maintain hell.

 

Who's to say Hell hasn't already frozen over? I mean it doesn't help it being fictional and all :P

Search_Warrant #18 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:27 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26010 battles
  • 5,341
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View Postbrumbarr, on 19 June 2017 - 04:16 PM, said:

 

thats why I said ignore their performance, I want to now the options for the visuals.

 

If that is the case, then i voted yes, for the last question i voted No, as im not a fan of Remodel type skins, it gives false visuals.

Grand_Moff_Tano #19 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:28 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 1273 battles
  • 10,424
  • [BC28] BC28
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

View Postbrumbarr, on 19 June 2017 - 04:27 PM, said:

 

We are doomed arent we?

 

Tis but the curse of Mortality... And Capitalism...

Search_Warrant #20 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:29 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 26010 battles
  • 5,341
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostChipmunk_of_Vengeance, on 19 June 2017 - 04:27 PM, said:

 

Who's to say Hell hasn't already frozen over? I mean it doesn't help it being fictional and all :P

 

Hey remember the time Mutant was never to be sold EVER again? :trollface:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users