Jump to content


are u playing Scout 10 or the branch is already dead ?

#scout10 postnerfscout are scout a dead branch? who play scout t10? areuplaying scout10? betterscouts

  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

PtitGibus #1 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:39 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 34716 battles
  • 25
  • [COCA] COCA
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013

A question for WG, how many people in percentage of the T10 players are scouts?

 

I see some T10 scout maybe 1 of 7-8 games,

the scout are useless in CW, maybe the 132-1 in rare occasion, why should I take a scout instead of a 121-140-62A in CW, or as BC 25 for scouting purposes.

they make no sense. Its already very very hard to pen the super heavies with the Bat, why should I take a scout with even less armor, less pen and less view range.

Mobility?. sure... corridor maps with a type5 who do not need to aim to deliver 1700 with gold ammo each time. Sure the Meds are less mobile, but all the Russian have a real armor, the Germans a sniping gun.

Camo?, yea, at tier 10. really?

View range? nope, thx to the nerf

Damage? maybe 132-1, but what a crapDpm..

Price? expensive in XP and expensive in gold as all the other tier 10, for an half tank, paper armor, 50%less life, peashooter gun at t10

too fast for arty maybe? surely not, the love to focus scouts to nuke them, because they get full damage

the list can go on, I'm back on question 1, how many plays the scout 10 WG?

and U guys, how many of you plays the 10 scouts? Are u planning to grind the branch or not?

what do u thing after a few month they are in games, did they have a role in T10?

 

WG will not change and de-nerf the scout if we do not react, I'm a premium player, translation for U WG, I'm a recurrent paying customer since 2013 (I think WG forgot what a customer means)  and i don't like the way the game is turning out with more super heavies, more OP premium with crappen.

Time to listen or U will loose your clients faster and faster.

 

 

 


Edited by PtitGibus, 19 June 2017 - 05:41 PM.


ellua #2 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:50 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 1160 battles
  • 555
  • Member since:
    09-29-2011

Very good summary about new lights here :

 

 

My personal thoughts: Iight tank balance is purely done in monetisation / profits in mind.

WG DONT WAN'T they be good because good light tanks means more ppl use they and less gold ammo used ( why use gold ammo shooting paper tank ? )

So instead of increasing light numbers we got increase in super heavy's  which one promotes gold ammo usage and premium accounts.

 

WG don't want WoT be better, they want milk player-base harder.



brumbarr #3 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:52 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

I got the  13 105 recently and played 100ish games.

First, I do like the tank and I think its fun to play and rewarding when you get it right.

You have the mobilty to deliver 1000dmg where needed.  

I do around 3.2k dpg and 1.1k spot, and I do feel I can have a good influence on my games.

 

BUT whe nyou look at performance of my other tanks, I do objectivly worse in it. So it does need a small buff but is defenitly fun to play and doesnt feel underpowered.

 



CptBarney #4 Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:53 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18996 battles
  • 3,978
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013

*Lights, and yes I will get the WZ-132-1 since I could do with grinding up another line gives me something to play for.


 

I wouldn't scout with them at first until I get used to them and just play them as light/mediums, flankers, ambushers and close support tanks.


 

they are good for flanking slow heavies while you track them and your team gets too shoot the softer parts. could have better accuracy but whatever.


 

otherwise I understand what you mean.


 

except the losing customers thing, I think there will be far greater problems that will cause that.


Edited by CptBarney, 19 June 2017 - 05:53 PM.


Search_Warrant #5 Posted 19 June 2017 - 06:17 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27131 battles
  • 6,078
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011
Tier 8 and 7 LT's are the best now. 9-10 are not so good anymore.

deivio82 #6 Posted 19 June 2017 - 06:32 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 47282 battles
  • 146
  • [LDTO] LDTO
  • Member since:
    05-20-2012

to me they useless ,nothing good about them, had them all in test server . 

 



Dundato #7 Posted 19 June 2017 - 06:50 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26270 battles
  • 715
  • Member since:
    06-09-2012

View PostPtitGibus, on 19 June 2017 - 04:39 PM, said:

A question for WG, how many people in percentage of the T10 players are scouts?

 

I see some T10 scout maybe 1 of 7-8 games,

the scout are useless in CW, maybe the 132-1 in rare occasion, why should I take a scout instead of a 121-140-62A in CW, or as BC 25 for scouting purposes.

they make no sense. Its already very very hard to pen the super heavies with the Bat, why should I take a scout with even less armor, less pen and less view range.

Mobility?. sure... corridor maps with a type5 who do not need to aim to deliver 1700 with gold ammo each time. Sure the Meds are less mobile, but all the Russian have a real armor, the Germans a sniping gun.

Camo?, yea, at tier 10. really?

View range? nope, thx to the nerf

Damage? maybe 132-1, but what a crapDpm..

Price? expensive in XP and expensive in gold as all the other tier 10, for an half tank, paper armor, 50%less life, peashooter gun at t10

too fast for arty maybe? surely not, the love to focus scouts to nuke them, because they get full damage

the list can go on, I'm back on question 1, how many plays the scout 10 WG?

and U guys, how many of you plays the 10 scouts? Are u planning to grind the branch or not?

what do u thing after a few month they are in games, did they have a role in T10?

 

WG will not change and de-nerf the scout if we do not react, I'm a premium player, translation for U WG, I'm a recurrent paying customer since 2013 (I think WG forgot what a customer means)  and i don't like the way the game is turning out with more super heavies, more OP premium with crappen.

Time to listen or U will loose your clients faster and faster.

 

 

 

 

Do u have a t10 scout?



Corruption_Clan #8 Posted 19 June 2017 - 06:58 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46045 battles
  • 722
  • Member since:
    11-19-2012
All you need to do is look at the equipment they propose you equip for the Chinese light tank as top of the tree and you can see that wargaming does not have a clue about light tanks

QuattroTT #9 Posted 19 June 2017 - 07:00 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 3224 battles
  • 46
  • Member since:
    12-25-2016
I see plenty of tier X lights everygame but thats probably because I play a light myself. Enjoying the RU251, keeper for me, looking forward to the panzerwagen. 

PtitGibus #10 Posted 19 June 2017 - 08:53 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 34716 battles
  • 25
  • [COCA] COCA
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013

View PostDundato, on 19 June 2017 - 06:50 PM, said:

 

Do u have a t10 scout?

 

i do not actually, a tried all of them in Beta, both super version and nerfed one, and i have all my 9th, Sheridan is unlocked but 6 million for it is really expensive, and I'm quite sure to be disappointed :(

 



lord_chipmonk #11 Posted 19 June 2017 - 09:20 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33727 battles
  • 10,250
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012
Not yet, but I'm working on it. Currently got the 1390, T-54 lwt and Ru 251. 

_b_ #12 Posted 19 June 2017 - 09:22 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 55134 battles
  • 3,989
  • Member since:
    04-06-2011
Grinding them all ... lights are fun ... so yeah :)

ZeeAa #13 Posted 20 June 2017 - 02:38 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27808 battles
  • 1,037
  • [--P--] --P--
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013
Hey maybe not everyone have them already?

Suurpolskija #14 Posted 20 June 2017 - 03:53 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18692 battles
  • 1,642
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 19 June 2017 - 07:17 PM, said:

Tier 8 and 7 LT's are the best now. 9-10 are not so good anymore.

 

I've had the impression that tier9 is the new black for LT's.

 

I'm 2x'ing towards Amx 105 and doing some odd reserves on my 13 90 now and then. I got also LTG, T49 and WZ-131.

 

I don't mind if the lights are a bit gimped atm, I kinda like the idea of being sort of an underdog with speed + camo on the move. Maybe I'll even give the RB's a new shot after getting that.



Enforcer1975 #15 Posted 20 June 2017 - 08:17 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20760 battles
  • 10,790
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
Currently working towards my 1st replacement tier ten 10 light....Obj. 140.  :P

Hammerhead20 #16 Posted 20 June 2017 - 09:19 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 25370 battles
  • 1,753
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

I only have M41 Bulldog which is not so amazing as before...

 

I'm not going to bother with higher tiers, because I know that I won't play at those...



Quintuss #17 Posted 20 June 2017 - 10:25 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26060 battles
  • 739
  • [DIVA_] DIVA_
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

Play/Get them? no. I dislike playing the whole class.

 

i'll unlock the tier 10 over time (daily wins) but basically that is crew-farming and working towards unlocking all vehicles. I don't intend to keep any US/German/French/Russian light - got better use for the crews. For China i'll keep the T8 for personal missions (and as the crew goes Type64 when i need a T6). Doesn't matter what country, i typically get 5-10% less winrate in these epileptic's  tanks.



Jumping_Turtle #18 Posted 20 June 2017 - 10:40 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60794 battles
  • 5,262
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013
Just got the Sheridan and I kinda like it. Use the 152mm on the T49 so decided to use the other gun on the Sheridan and it is ok. Now slowly working on the German T10. Still need 150k XP on the RU to get the T10.

Raffy5 #19 Posted 20 June 2017 - 10:45 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26711 battles
  • 1,977
  • Member since:
    07-09-2012

View Postbrumbarr, on 19 June 2017 - 06:52 PM, said:

I got the  13 105 recently and played 100ish games.

First, I do like the tank and I think its fun to play and rewarding when you get it right.

You have the mobilty to deliver 1000dmg where needed.  

I do around 3.2k dpg and 1.1k spot, and I do feel I can have a good influence on my games.

 

BUT whe nyou look at performance of my other tanks, I do objectivly worse in it. So it does need a small buff but is defenitly fun to play and doesnt feel underpowered.

 

 

How is it vs 13 90, just finished the grind yesterday and enjoined the new tier 9 amx 13 90 very much thru out the grind. 

Similar play style?


Edited by Raffy5, 20 June 2017 - 10:45 AM.


OreH75 #20 Posted 20 June 2017 - 11:52 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 47465 battles
  • 2,096
  • [RANGR] RANGR
  • Member since:
    05-29-2013

View PostPtitGibus, on 19 June 2017 - 05:39 PM, said:

and U guys, how many of you plays the 10 scouts? Are u planning to grind the branch or not?

what do u thing after a few month they are in games, did they have a role in T10?

 

WG will not change and de-nerf the scout if we do not react, I'm a premium player, translation for U WG, I'm a recurrent paying customer since 2013 (I think WG forgot what a customer means)  and i don't like the way the game is turning out with more super heavies, more OP premium with crappen.

Time to listen or U will loose your clients faster and faster.

 

 

 

Yes, scouts are fun to play. Got the T100-LT right after release and grinded WZ-132-1 in 2 weeks when it became TotT this month. Now slowly grinding the German, French and USA lines.

 

But its good to hear a complaint from a guy who has actually played T10 lights him self...oh wait you only played on the test server with 95% (russian) yolo gold spamming players...not a good reference






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users