Jump to content


Sliphantom cencored?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
29 replies to this topic

thiextar #1 Posted 24 June 2017 - 10:30 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15416 battles
  • 532
  • Member since:
    06-21-2012

Yesterday he uploaded a youtube video as an introduction to his upcoming series of videos analysing what is currently wrong with wot, and tonight i got a notification on my phone that the next part was uploaded(Still have that notification saved) But now when i want to check that video out, it has been removed.

 

Has wargaming threatened him just like they did foch? I cant seem to find a comment from sliphantom about it.

 

Edit: here is the video link: https://www.youtube....h?v=NVXZuAIupig


Edited by thiextar, 24 June 2017 - 10:36 AM.


lord_chipmonk #2 Posted 24 June 2017 - 10:31 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33952 battles
  • 10,251
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012
Given the sh!tstorm over fochgate, I doubt it is the same. 

thiextar #3 Posted 24 June 2017 - 10:34 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15416 battles
  • 532
  • Member since:
    06-21-2012

View Postlord_chipmonk, on 24 June 2017 - 10:31 AM, said:

Given the sh!tstorm over fochgate, I doubt it is the same. 

I mean, it is fully possible that sliphantom had some last minute editing to do, but it is also possible that wargaming thought he was so small that nobody would notice. Anyways, as long as there is the slightest chance that wargaming fell back on their ways, we have to investigate it.



Jigabachi #4 Posted 24 June 2017 - 10:36 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17923 battles
  • 19,019
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Hint: Next time light the torches AFTER that investigation.

lord_chipmonk #5 Posted 24 June 2017 - 10:37 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33952 battles
  • 10,251
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012
Yeah, fair dos. 

Marlekin #6 Posted 24 June 2017 - 10:38 AM

    Brigadier

  • Beta Tester
  • 33412 battles
  • 4,122
  • [HOFF] HOFF
  • Member since:
    11-10-2010
I still see his first video, so I think hes fine. I really dont think WG would make thát mistake again

anonym_kL7qtn3e52MB #7 Posted 24 June 2017 - 10:44 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 6,815
  • Member since:
    07-10-2018

 

vs

 

 

 

vs

 

vs

 

 

 

 

As you can see there are various reasons why a video might be removed.

in this case, I think the uploader removed it...

 

 

 

 

B.t.w. Did you ask the uploader what happened or did you jump to conclusions?



jabster #8 Posted 24 June 2017 - 10:44 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12537 battles
  • 23,387
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010
I might just be being cynical but is this just a way of advertising someone's content?

RockyRoller #9 Posted 24 June 2017 - 10:49 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32272 battles
  • 1,240
  • [NR-NS] NR-NS
  • Member since:
    06-15-2016

You Tube, thats your problem.

It has literally been taken over by small assertive tyrants (little Hitlers) and even up nations govenments who want you to do as they say, watch only what they want you to see, and if you disagree they want you banned, no platformed or demonetised.

They have quite literally infiltrated the establishment with lobbying, so despite being minorities in numbers they pressure both inside and outside the main stream industry. You all saw what happened to users like PewDiePie

 

I kid you not, this really is not paranoia.

It is a reflection of the education system being slowly radicalised since the 1960s  until we have a couple of generations of indoctrinated post education adults acting like undemocratic despots, and blaming everybody else or some group for their woes, real or imaginary. We have entered an era where evading responsibility and shooting down decent is our 1984.

 

I'd advise you to quit YT,FB and Twitter, who have been corrupted and join somewhere like Minds.com

 



Jigabachi #10 Posted 24 June 2017 - 10:51 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17923 battles
  • 19,019
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View Postjabster, on 24 June 2017 - 10:44 AM, said:

I might just be being cynical but is this just a way of advertising someone's content?

It's weekend Internet drama.

People have no idea what to do with their free time.



PauI #11 Posted 24 June 2017 - 11:19 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25611 battles
  • 396
  • Member since:
    10-15-2011

View PostJigabachi, on 24 June 2017 - 09:51 AM, said:

It's weekend Internet drama.

People have no idea what to do with their free time.

Lol jabster and jigabachi (the one with the breeding problem).... greatest trolls on this forum commenting about free time...:))



Balc0ra #12 Posted 24 June 2017 - 11:27 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66269 battles
  • 16,249
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
For all we know he had issues with the video himself. And removed it. Or did notice an editing mistake after he uploaded it. If WG did point his finger at him. I'm sure he will let you know. As he usually was more "open" vs WG then  Foch was tbh.

Hellfoxe #13 Posted 24 June 2017 - 11:30 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22804 battles
  • 513
  • Member since:
    04-05-2011

View Postthiextar, on 24 June 2017 - 10:30 AM, said:

Yesterday he uploaded a youtube video as an introduction to his upcoming series of videos analysing what is currently wrong with wot, and tonight i got a notification on my phone that the next part was uploaded(Still have that notification saved) But now when i want to check that video out, it has been removed.

 

Has wargaming threatened him just like they did foch? I cant seem to find a comment from sliphantom about it.

 

Edit: here is the video link: https://www.youtube....h?v=NVXZuAIupig

 

Treat him with a lawsuit? Sound big news then "International company to press charge against youtuber for criticize them ". Story can made in Hollywood movies then.

thiextar #14 Posted 24 June 2017 - 12:01 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15416 battles
  • 532
  • Member since:
    06-21-2012
The thing is, if he was threatened, it would read "User has deleted video" rather than something like "Copyright strike". Also, if they did threaten him, im pretty sure that they would have learned enough from the fochgate situation to also make sure that he keeps his mouth shut about it. Which makes the investigation fall onto us. Ive never seen him delete a video, and all of a sudden, a criticizing video gets removed...

Edited by thiextar, 24 June 2017 - 12:02 PM.


qpranger #15 Posted 24 June 2017 - 12:02 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32438 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostHellfoxe, on 24 June 2017 - 12:30 PM, said:

 

Treat him with a lawsuit?

 

You mean threaten?

Getting sued is hardly a treat.



jabster #16 Posted 24 June 2017 - 12:13 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12537 battles
  • 23,387
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostPauI, on 24 June 2017 - 10:19 AM, said:

Lol jabster and jigabachi (the one with the breeding problem).... greatest trolls on this forum commenting about free time...:))

 

Would you care to point to the comment I made about free time or is this just another case of I read what I want to believe not what was written?

jabster #17 Posted 24 June 2017 - 12:16 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12537 battles
  • 23,387
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View Postthiextar, on 24 June 2017 - 11:01 AM, said:

The thing is, if he was threatened, it would read "User has deleted video" rather than something like "Copyright strike". Also, if they did threaten him, im pretty sure that they would have learned enough from the fochgate situation to also make sure that he keeps his mouth shut about it. Which makes the investigation fall onto us. Ive never seen him delete a video, and all of a sudden, a criticizing video gets removed...

 

Why would he keep his mouth shut about it. Foch got more free advertising for his content than he could have dreamed of?



Pantzer #18 Posted 24 June 2017 - 12:20 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 19859 battles
  • 158
  • Member since:
    06-30-2011

Damn, OP are you just itching to get a kick in on WG? 

 

You have already lighted the torches and trying to start an uproar on such a slim and hollow reason...

 

I'm not a super fan of WG but neither am I one of those primitives that do everything in their power to spit and trash WG at every opportunity like you are doing now.

 

But the reason this is completely retarded is that there isn't even a case.... It's just trash talk... Get yourself a hoppy, man... This is cringe worthy.



Tinbawx #19 Posted 24 June 2017 - 12:24 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14747 battles
  • 1,251
  • [SNOB] SNOB
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011
Yeah, I kinda can´t imagine Sliphantom not making a big stink about it if the removal of the video was due to WG threats or whatever. No idea when the video got removed, I watched it last night, but I´m sure he´ll let people know (as in raise a sh*tstorm) if this one is on  WG. I wouldn´t jump to conclusions just yet.

HundeWurst #20 Posted 24 June 2017 - 12:26 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 69735 battles
  • 4,337
  • [ROIDS] ROIDS
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostJigabachi, on 24 June 2017 - 10:36 AM, said:

Hint: Next time light the torches AFTER that investigation.

But thats not fun.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users