Jump to content


Can someone explain this? tier for tier same gun.


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

Search_Warrant #1 Posted 26 June 2017 - 01:56 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27190 battles
  • 6,143
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

Reading in swed TD section and i read somet odd.

 

IKV65/2 has 0.34 accuracy. but the stock SAME gun on the tier 7 TD has 0.4 accuracy? who the hell balanced these tanks? why would it be WORSE 1 tier higher? the top gun has 0.36!!! WHAT?

 

I question the balance department's sanity.(lol doubt they got one)

 

 



DeltaOperator #2 Posted 26 June 2017 - 02:00 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 23988 battles
  • 4,817
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014
The only balance WG cares about is their bank balance.

1ncompetenc3 #3 Posted 26 June 2017 - 02:04 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36897 battles
  • 11,492
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013
Worse aim time too. :trollface:

Balc0ra #4 Posted 26 June 2017 - 02:12 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66269 battles
  • 16,249
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

You never noticed? Compare most TD guns one tier up. They usually have worse dispersion. Since the gun one tier up have more DPM, more traverse etc. Even the JP II and Jagdtiger's L/55 have that to name one. It's not something they started on the Swedish TD's.

 

 


Edited by Balc0ra, 26 June 2017 - 02:13 AM.


Search_Warrant #5 Posted 26 June 2017 - 02:42 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27190 battles
  • 6,143
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostBalc0ra, on 26 June 2017 - 01:12 AM, said:

You never noticed? Compare most TD guns one tier up. They usually have worse dispersion. Since the gun one tier up have more DPM, more traverse etc. Even the JP II and Jagdtiger's L/55 have that to name one. It's not something they started on the Swedish TD's.

 

 

 

Doesent seem balanced. i dont go up tiers to get shat on. 0.34 to 0.4 is derp levels of accuracy. not a small increase at all.

Edited by Search_Warrant, 26 June 2017 - 02:42 AM.


Plasma_Fire #6 Posted 26 June 2017 - 03:38 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19581 battles
  • 722
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011

Its because you guys want equally balanced tanks.

 

You are always whining about a nerf or a buff, this is the result of it.

If WG dont keep you interested they lose your wallet



Search_Warrant #7 Posted 26 June 2017 - 03:55 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 27190 battles
  • 6,143
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View PostPlasma_Fire, on 26 June 2017 - 02:38 AM, said:

Its because you guys want equally balanced tanks.

 

You are always whining about a nerf or a buff, this is the result of it.

If WG dont keep you interested they lose your wallet

 

care to explain in great detail of this? or is tinfoil on sale again?

hedi2222 #8 Posted 26 June 2017 - 04:17 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 30444 battles
  • 7,831
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    08-12-2013
the ikv65 sucks butt anyway. 8.3 secs reload with crappy despersion values when the hellcat has less than 7 secs reload with a full turret. Ples

Aikl #9 Posted 26 June 2017 - 08:41 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25540 battles
  • 4,349
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011
If the accuracy was equal/better/decent, you'd have less motivation to free-XP the top gun on Ikv 90B. Does it make sense now?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users