Jump to content


Anti-killsteal


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
65 replies to this topic

AC130Pilot #1 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:00 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15190 battles
  • 174
  • Member since:
    12-14-2013

Kill displays for greatest damage dealt without changing experience calculations.


View Posttgm_tx, on 26 June 2017 - 11:38 AM, said:

And another MAJOR issues make already kills to count to those who is made most dmg at the given target - it's the most fair and it will leave last hitters imbeciles empty handed at it should also be...

 

This idea is worthy of consideration as it will put an end to the frustration regarding personal missions like MT-15 where TDs have to be taken out as well as a certain amount of damage has to be dealt to ensure perfect completion. Doing enough damage is not as difficult as securing your rightful/well earned kill.


View PostAliceUnchained, on 26 June 2017 - 05:39 PM, said:

A kill is a kill. Regardless of damage dealt previously. The one dealing the most damage already receives more XP and credits. Being credited with a kill you did not actually bag is just nonsense. The only exception I would consider is when you've set the target on fire and normally it would burn down to 0 HP, but gets snagged by a team mate prior to that (or alternatively when HP has dropped below a certain percentage).

 

Which is why a "display as kill for player only if damage dealt by player is greater than all damage received by damaged vehicle" parameter should be introduced without changing experience calculations. The one who kills the tank gets the same amount of exp as before, but the kill gets counted to the player who dealt the greatest damage, who will get exp for all other actions he/she did except for the displayed kill. I guess it can be called "the phantom kill". Might encourage players to focus on a single target till it's neutralized. Also, TD-15 would become a bit easier to complete (at least for high α TDs like ISU-152, Jagdpanzer E 100 because if you hit once and few allies with low α tanks also hit 1 time each you will be the one who dealt the most damage quite oftenly).


Edited by AC130Pilot, 28 June 2017 - 01:08 PM.


qpranger #2 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:05 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32524 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
Bitching about "kill stealing" is such an adolescent thing. No "like" from me.

JuliusCheddar #3 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:06 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29783 battles
  • 564
  • [3BPAN] 3BPAN
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014

Why would you care about kills anyway? 

Damage is damage :v



WotPizza #4 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:08 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 24361 battles
  • 244
  • [P1XEL] P1XEL
  • Member since:
    04-07-2016
There is no killstealing.

DuncaN_101 #5 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:13 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53226 battles
  • 1,897
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
A gun less on the fields is what matters. Not who took the kill or hp.

Non issue here I'd say

HaZardeur #6 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:14 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 33473 battles
  • 1,187
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010
Kill "stealing" is something BF or CoD nerds get a boner over. Get over it, every less gun on the enemy team is a step to victory... If you want to have 1vs 1s play chess.

signal11th #7 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:16 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 37182 battles
  • 5,711
  • [S3AL] S3AL
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011
No such thing as kill stealing in WOT.

AliceUnchained #8 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:22 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 38414 battles
  • 8,928
  • [322] 322
  • Member since:
    10-18-2011

As you don't own any of the targets, there can't possibly be any stealing. And you clearly failed to comprehend what I wrote *Edited, as you shouldn't be credited with a kill which you didn't bag yourself. Regardless of damage dealt.

 

Not to mention it is completely illogical, and utterly nonsensical, and even more misleading and confusing, to award the kill to player A but give the XP for the kill to player B. Actually, it's just a plain *Edited idea.

 

View PostAC130Pilot, on 28 June 2017 - 10:00 AM, said:

Which is why a "display as killfor player only if damage dealt by player is greater than all damage received by damaged vehicle" parameter should be introduced 

 

Ehm... how can you deal more damage to a vehicle than it actually receives? At most, you can deal the full amount (so 100%) of damage to the vehicle. Not more. You might want to revise this bit...


Edited by Nohe21, 29 June 2017 - 03:57 PM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to not being constructive.


AC130Pilot #9 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:25 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15190 battles
  • 174
  • Member since:
    12-14-2013
I see that click-bait title does wonders... However, it is what's under the title what matters. No constructive replies so far.

LaManche #10 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:28 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19289 battles
  • 477
  • Member since:
    03-31-2014

View PostAC130Pilot, on 28 June 2017 - 09:25 AM, said:

I see that click-bait title does wonders... However, it is what's under the title what matters. No constructive replies so far.

 

Expecting constructive replies on nonconstructive topic? Keep on daydreaming.

Edited by LaManche, 28 June 2017 - 10:28 AM.


Shaade_Silentpaw #11 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:29 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 22676 battles
  • 377
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

Ugh...every time I hear the word 'killsteal' in WoT, a little part of my soul dies.

Thankfully I've only heard it like twice in 15k games.



malachi6 #12 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:29 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 49938 battles
  • 3,473
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011
Team game.  If you are playing properly you are focusing fire to quickly remove targets from the field and win the game.  As such there is no kill stealing.  

Edited by malachi6, 28 June 2017 - 10:29 AM.


DuncaN_101 #13 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:30 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53226 battles
  • 1,897
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011
Beat me to it

Look op if a noob like me can do that mission so can you. It's just a matter of patience and mm luck.

AC130Pilot #14 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:32 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15190 battles
  • 174
  • Member since:
    12-14-2013
Well... I have your attention, don't I?

DuncaN_101 #15 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:39 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53226 battles
  • 1,897
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View PostAC130Pilot, on 28 June 2017 - 10:32 AM, said:

Well... I have your attention, don't I?

 

Basically I have nothing better to do right now.

 

So yes I saw you craved attention so much wich apparently you don't get it anywhere else that I figured I'd humour to. 

 

Feel a bit better now? 



qpranger #16 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:39 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32524 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostAC130Pilot, on 28 June 2017 - 11:32 AM, said:

Well... I have your attention, don't I?

 

So what now? Will you pitch us Amway products?

PauI #17 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:51 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 25734 battles
  • 397
  • Member since:
    10-15-2011

View Postsignal11th, on 28 June 2017 - 09:16 AM, said:

No such thing as kill stealing in WOT.

Wtf is wrong with people ourdays....like the dude above is saing there is no kill steal in wot. Stealing implies that someone has possession....

 

 



Jigabachi #18 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:53 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17935 battles
  • 19,087
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Or... just change the missions instead of fixing something that doesn't need fixing.

TungstenHitman #19 Posted 28 June 2017 - 10:55 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 22240 battles
  • 4,075
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

View PostJuliusCheddar, on 28 June 2017 - 09:06 AM, said:

Why would you care about kills anyway? 

Damage is damage :v

Tell that to Mr Radley Walters and MR Pools



Is this one of those situations where we distribute torches and pitchforks and burn the OP at the stake? YES!!
 

anonym_kL7qtn3e52MB #20 Posted 28 June 2017 - 11:03 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 6,815
  • Member since:
    07-10-2018

View PostAC130Pilot, on 28 June 2017 - 10:25 AM, said:

I see that click-bait title does wonders... However, it is what's under the title what matters. No constructive replies so far.

 

reported...?

 

 

WG is deceptive enough, we don't need PLAYERERS to deceive other players as well.

Don't clickbait and admit it...


Edited by Spek_en_Bonen, 28 June 2017 - 11:04 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users