Jump to content


100% Serious, WHY are people so bad?

bad players

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
83 replies to this topic

G01ngToxicCommand0 #21 Posted 02 July 2017 - 12:44 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37465 battles
  • 784
  • Member since:
    11-03-2011

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 11:30 AM, said:

I can understand when 12 year olds suck at this game, their brain haven't fully developed yet.. 

But all these players with 20k→100k+ games that still haven't got a clue how to play this game.. wtf? Like seriously, ive been playing it a year and know a lot more than 99% of players.. 

people who camp on malinovka

people who camp on prokorovka (even when there's no arty's)

people who camp... anywhere

Camping loses games, sniping loses games a lot more than it actually wins games (unless you are a TD, but if u suck then u also lose the games)

Lets start with malinovka, that hill wins the game, yet 80% of the team camps the rocks at base.

Lakeville, light tanks spotting the valley? really? 

Mountain pass north spawn, lights rushing mid to spot south? You die 99% of the time.

Overlord people go beach?? Instant lose

Erlenberg, north goes line 2, south goes line 9, yet people drown, but you do realise that if the south spawn actually pushes the line 2 line SMARTLY, it means that the team wins, usually that means that u have to be in a platoon so u can push it together (just the other day me and a friend pushed with our meds the 2 line from south spawn, won the entire flank and game cuz of that)

And a LOT of other maps as well...

If you do stupid things like going beach on Overlord, like 3-4 times and notice that you never win the game, why would you continue to do the same mistake over and over and over and over and over again? After 20k games i would really expect people to have overall 2k wn8, anything less than that means they can't play the game.. really wish i could actually modify my XVM that turns a certain amount of battles by someone Red if their wn8 isnt a certain amount..

Already modified my XVM colours making 0-1100 wn8 as red, and 1100-1300 orange, but hell, when i see pople with 20k games and 1310 wn8 they shouldn't be yellow, they should be 100% red..

 

So why can't people learn how the game works? Everyone has access to the same Youtubers, streamers, game, tactics, maps, tanks, everything.. yet people can't learn how the game works.. like those people who make the most pathetic mistakes (just 1 example: suicide spotting) and then they type in chat "fk u idiot team" for the entire game spamming chat because THEY messed up..

Why do people continue to suck? Why? Literally the only thing I can think of is that people are (literally) mentally ill, and considering that that means that 95% of WoT players are mentally ill... then my last small hope for humankind just died..

 

Wargaming wants stupid people to play the game so why are you surprised that WoT is filled with bad players?:ohmy:

Homer_J #22 Posted 02 July 2017 - 12:48 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 31689 battles
  • 34,752
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 12:39 PM, said:

 

Adults with slower reflexes? Yeah sure but unless you are 60+ years old.. nope. well i dont know exactly how reflexes are, but WoT isn't just about reflexes, it is about knowledge.. reflexes play a small part of the game,

 

I'm not sure that it's as small a part of the game as is generally thought.  I miss (or rather don't take) a lot of shots because I don't react fast enough to a cupola or tiny corner of an enemy coming into my line of fire.

 

Yes it can be frustrating when you are spectating your last team mate and they don't seem to have control of both hands at once but we know that two thirds of the team will be like that, which is why staying alive when you are one of the good players on your team is so important.



Hyster #23 Posted 02 July 2017 - 12:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27454 battles
  • 595
  • [T-S_K] T-S_K
  • Member since:
    02-14-2012

maybe not every1 is interested in being a re-rolling stat padder and play the game for fun instead of WN8.

encase u didn't realise high WN8 does NOT make a good player



anonym_YNch2j0j5oJ9 #24 Posted 02 July 2017 - 12:54 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 689
  • Member since:
    09-24-2018

View PostHomer_J, on 02 July 2017 - 12:48 PM, said:

 

I'm not sure that it's as small a part of the game as is generally thought.  I miss (or rather don't take) a lot of shots because I don't react fast enough to a cupola or tiny corner of an enemy coming into my line of fire.

 

Yes it can be frustrating when you are spectating your last team mate and they don't seem to have control of both hands at once but we know that two thirds of the team will be like that, which is why staying alive when you are one of the good players on your team is so important.

 

I miss those shots also in the situations you described.. and im 17 years old, so I think my reflexes should be working just fine. Or maybe it is because of me having the lowest graphic settings + 30 fps + 230 ping, really not sure but either way, even with those shots missing.. it doesn't happen every single battle for 20k battles, it is quite rare

anonym_YNch2j0j5oJ9 #25 Posted 02 July 2017 - 12:59 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 689
  • Member since:
    09-24-2018

View PostHyster, on 02 July 2017 - 12:52 PM, said:

maybe not every1 is interested in being a re-rolling stat padder and play the game for fun instead of WN8.

encase u didn't realise high WN8 does NOT make a good player

 

Ah yes, that "reroll" excuse.. tell me, how on earth did i reroll? Sorry for having 1500 wn8 after 8k battles.. how dare I learn from my mistakes.. curse me.. So tell me, how on earth did I reroll when a LOT of my tanks have 400-1000 wn8? and If i rerolled, my overall wn8 would be over 2000 and recent close to that, I wouldn't have 1500 wn8 and 2500 recent.. so wth? And i also play the game for fun, but what is fun when seeing all the bad players? It is okay seeing the bad players at lower tiers (1→7) but tier 8-10 really? and uhm having a 3k wn8 after 30k battles does make you good. but having a 1k wn8 after 30k battles DEFINITELY makes you a bad player, but yeah wn8 isn't always 100% accurate.. but it is most of the time



Long_Range_Sniper #26 Posted 02 July 2017 - 01:05 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36600 battles
  • 10,198
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    04-04-2011

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 10:30 AM, said:

I can understand when 12 year olds suck at this game, their brain haven't fully developed yet.. 

 

You've still a long way to go at 13, but stick at it and in time you'll learn many things about life, the universe, and everything.

 

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 10:30 AM, said:

Literally the only thing I can think of is that people are (literally) mentally ill, and considering that that means that 95% of WoT players are mentally ill... then my last small hope for humankind just died..

 

Once you reach 14, you may find there are other reasons, but you stick with the one that make you feel better about yourself.



Junglist_ #27 Posted 02 July 2017 - 01:15 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39685 battles
  • 1,363
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 11:39 AM, said:

 

Adults with slower reflexes? Yeah sure but unless you are 60+ years old.. nope.

Acording to this study after the age of 24 reflexes related to videogames start to decline http://journals.plos...al.pone.0094215

 

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 11:39 AM, said:

 

WoT isn't just about reflexes, it is about knowledge.. reflexes play a small part of the game, unless u redline snipe the entire game but if u do that, then u are anyways bad so..

 

 

Did I say WoT is only about reflexes? No I listed people with slower reflexes as ONE of few different reasons people might not be good at the game and I'm sure theres more. Please next time actually read before replying otherwise theres no point

 

Edit:

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 11:39 AM, said:

 

but lets say 99% is unrealistic, definitely 95% then..

 

 

A player with 2k avg on TVP, 140 and Batchat saying hes DEFINITELY better than 95% players

 


Edited by Junglist_, 02 July 2017 - 01:22 PM.


Aim_Away_From_Face #28 Posted 02 July 2017 - 01:21 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 75 battles
  • 709
  • Member since:
    09-10-2011

View PostLong_Range_Sniper, on 02 July 2017 - 01:05 PM, said:

 

You've still a long way to go at 13, but stick at it and in time you'll learn many things about life, the universe, and everything.

 

 

 

I didn't think that happened until age 42?

anonym_YNch2j0j5oJ9 #29 Posted 02 July 2017 - 01:38 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 689
  • Member since:
    09-24-2018

View PostJunglist_, on 02 July 2017 - 01:15 PM, said:

Did I say WoT is only about reflexes? No I listed people with slower reflexes as ONE of few different reasons people might not be good at the game and I'm sure theres more. Please next time actually read before replying otherwise theres no point

 

Edit:

 

A player with 2k avg on TVP, 140 and Batchat saying hes DEFINITELY better than 95% players

I just mentioned reflexes because that's the only thing I can talk about, I don't know enough of the other things

and yeah my average on TVP sucks, congrats it is one tank. and my 140 has 2.3k DPG and BC has 2.2k, and considering i played all those games without platoons and non stop terrible teams.. what did u expect? And i played almost all my tier 10s quite long ago... im a better player now 



Jigabachi #30 Posted 02 July 2017 - 01:55 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 21,021
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostHyster, on 02 July 2017 - 12:52 PM, said:

maybe not every1 is interested in being a re-rolling stat padder and play the game for fun

What the heck do reroll statspadders have to do with any of this?

And we all play this game for "fun". For reroll statspadders it is fun to look at all those colorful numbers, for bad players it's fun to be bad. Somehow. Which is kinda mindblowing...



JocMeister #31 Posted 02 July 2017 - 01:55 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 26825 battles
  • 2,531
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostJunglist_, on 02 July 2017 - 01:15 PM, said:

Acording to this study after the age of 24 reflexes related to videogames start to decline http://journals.plos...al.pone.0094215

 

 

Did I say WoT is only about reflexes? No I listed people with slower reflexes as ONE of few different reasons people might not be good at the game and I'm sure theres more. Please next time actually read before replying otherwise theres no point

 

Edit:

 

A player with 2k avg on TVP, 140 and Batchat saying hes DEFINITELY better than 95% players

 

 

Average damage in the 140 on the EU server is somewhere around 1800. 2k might not be top 95% but its still quite a bit above average.



CmdRatScabies #32 Posted 02 July 2017 - 02:13 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 38475 battles
  • 4,951
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    10-12-2015

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 01:38 PM, said:

.. im a better player now

 

If you were as good as you seem to think you are you probably wouldn't have started a topic asking why everyone is so bad.

Edited by CmdRatScabies, 02 July 2017 - 02:13 PM.


Junglist_ #33 Posted 02 July 2017 - 02:13 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 39685 battles
  • 1,363
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 12:38 PM, said:

I just mentioned reflexes because that's the only thing I can talk about, I don't know enough of the other things

and yeah my average on TVP sucks, congrats it is one tank. and my 140 has 2.3k DPG and BC has 2.2k, and considering i played all those games without platoons and non stop terrible teams.. what did u expect? And i played almost all my tier 10s quite long ago... im a better player now 

 

Please more worthless excuses. Platooning means less damage for yourself. Terrible teams is a garbage players excuse. In last 1k battles you played more than 100 with tier 10s not so long ago eh?

And what would I expect? Well I don't know maybe several 3 marked tier 10s or 9s since youre saying that youre definitely better than 95% of WoT playerbase.

Or on what metric are basing that?

 



Stat_Padder #34 Posted 02 July 2017 - 02:14 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 45610 battles
  • 568
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 10:30 AM, said:

I can understand when 12 year olds suck at this game, their brain haven't fully developed yet.. 

 

8k ---> 51% & 26% survival rate? we can all learn from your fine example.

AC130Pilot #35 Posted 02 July 2017 - 02:26 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15226 battles
  • 174
  • Member since:
    12-14-2013

Stat_Padder,

 

80.76% WR... Just curious - do enemies surrender as soon as they see you in the battle? I... I just can't... I do not understand...



Tinom5 #36 Posted 02 July 2017 - 02:32 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 9660 battles
  • 488
  • [STAR-] STAR-
  • Member since:
    01-29-2014
Or when you have to defend and your team rushes 1 side and lose the game since they cant shoot ? See now campers sometimes are way better than lemming trains witch brainlessly rush.

JocMeister #37 Posted 02 July 2017 - 02:37 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 26825 battles
  • 2,531
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostAC130Pilot, on 02 July 2017 - 02:26 PM, said:

Stat_Padder,

 

80.76% WR... Just curious - do enemies surrender as soon as they see you in the battle? I... I just can't... I do not understand...

 

Average tier 3,6. 10k games in the B2.

Slargmann #38 Posted 02 July 2017 - 02:43 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27607 battles
  • 102
  • [FPDOX] FPDOX
  • Member since:
    06-13-2011

View PostJocMeister, on 02 July 2017 - 01:37 PM, said:

 

Average tier 3,6. 10k games in the B2.

 

There's a guy like that in Warships that has 99% of his games in the one OP premium ship. It's bewildering. I'd get bored pretty quickly.

Jigabachi #39 Posted 02 July 2017 - 02:57 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 21,021
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostAC130Pilot, on 02 July 2017 - 02:26 PM, said:

Stat_Padder,

 

80.76% WR... Just curious - do enemies surrender as soon as they see you in the battle? I... I just can't... I do not understand...

His nickname might give away his secret...



WindSplitter1 #40 Posted 02 July 2017 - 03:28 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18873 battles
  • 3,294
  • [DTPT] DTPT
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostTerblanche77, on 02 July 2017 - 10:30 AM, said:

people who camp on prokorovka (even when there's no arty's)

people who camp... anywhere

 

 

You sure are a funny guy. Last comment you made your bashing on arty. Then you say this.

 

Well, ladies and gentlemen. Mystery solved. Artillery doesn't promote camping. You can all RIP now.







Also tagged with bad players

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users