Jump to content


Can someone explain this magic to me?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
20 replies to this topic

Unicums_Tast3_G00D #1 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:11 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 17287 battles
  • 107
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    07-28-2011

https://www.youtube....h?v=GEyjBoBAl3U

 

and another video 

 

https://www.youtube....?v=zL-5Yxigf7U 

 

but theres no cheats in wot no no says the unicum! :izmena::izmena:



brumbarr #2 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:23 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,293
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

There are no hacks, only bugs.

Nice 2 year old videos mate.


Edited by brumbarr, 05 July 2017 - 12:23 AM.


captainpigg #3 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:25 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 30359 battles
  • 761
  • [F-DIV] F-DIV
  • Member since:
    02-22-2014

1'st video, only thing weird or illegal I saw was the white skins on dead tanks. Tanks disappearing when no-one has sight on them is normal.

2'nd video, 1'st shot was logical spot to shoot, 2'nd also logical but also lucky.

 

How many shares do you own of the tinfoil manufacturer?



Unicums_Tast3_G00D #4 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:31 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 17287 battles
  • 107
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    07-28-2011
HAHAHAHAAH i love the scripted response as if WG are typing for you!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JuicyProduction #5 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:33 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27140 battles
  • 274
  • [OMNI] OMNI
  • Member since:
    11-10-2013

View Postcaptainpigg, on 04 July 2017 - 11:25 PM, said:

1'st video, only thing weird or illegal I saw was the white skins on dead tanks. Tanks disappearing when no-one has sight on them is normal.

2'nd video, 1'st shot was logical spot to shoot, 2'nd also logical but also lucky.

 

How many shares do you own of the tinfoil manufacturer?

 

How about you go to the download link and see where it takes you? funny how WG claimed the site and saying use of illegal mods get you banned. Yeah all logic no hacks.

captainpigg #6 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:38 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 30359 battles
  • 761
  • [F-DIV] F-DIV
  • Member since:
    02-22-2014
What download link? And why switch alts?

1ncompetenc3 #7 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:40 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36772 battles
  • 11,489
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

IIRC there's another video to go with the first one but from the point of view of someone on the other team (which is why that video is titled the way it is) which is a lot more interesting and shows a bug that does in fact cause most of the tanks to be invisible. A bug in 2015 does not prove rampant hacking in 2017.

 

Second video looks odd but again it's not a particularly recent vid, and I suspect it's just another (or the same) bug. If you had looked further you would have found a video of someone playing a CGC that is invisible until it actually touches an enemy. He's happily shotgunning people in the face from point blank range without getting spotted before that point. Of course that probably doesn't fit your narrative so you wouldn't have linked it even if you had seen it, I'm just saying.

 

Maybe inform yourself before making yourself look ridiculous in the future.


Edited by 1ncompetenc3, 05 July 2017 - 12:42 AM.


Unicums_Tast3_G00D #8 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:46 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 17287 battles
  • 107
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    07-28-2011
 1ncompetenc3 so there is rampant hacking 2017 i never knew that really? 

JuicyProduction #9 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:48 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27140 battles
  • 274
  • [OMNI] OMNI
  • Member since:
    11-10-2013

View Postcaptainpigg, on 04 July 2017 - 11:38 PM, said:

What download link? And why switch alts?

 

I'm not an alt of Panzer you *edited*. The fact that all you miss the point shows why WG can feed us so much *edited*. It's not about the rampant hacking it's exactly the point. It's about *edited* rng/spotting/camo system that WG states ''Wether you like it or not, it works''. Yeah my *edited* it works. They don't need to worry about fixing it either cause their *edited* riders will save them.

Edited by Jbnn, 05 July 2017 - 06:35 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


1ncompetenc3 #10 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:49 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36772 battles
  • 11,489
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostPanzerfaust123, on 05 July 2017 - 12:46 AM, said:

 1ncompetenc3 so there is rampant hacking 2017 i never knew that really? 

 

You're the potato who started a thread with old videos of "cheats", I'm just filling in the next logical step for you.

 

View PostJuicyProduction, on 05 July 2017 - 12:48 AM, said:

 

I'm not an alt of Panzer you *edited*. The fact that all you miss the point shows why WG can feed us so much *edited*. It's not about the rampant hacking it's exactly the point. It's about *edited* rng/spotting/camo system that WG states ''Wether you like it or not, it works''. Yeah my *edited* it works. They don't need to worry about fixing it either cause their *edited* riders will save them. 

 

Really now? Because the OP never mentioned mechanics, but did mention cheats. And guess what: spotting system has been changed a bit, and it's noticeably better now.

brumbarr #11 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:52 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,293
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostJuicyProduction, on 05 July 2017 - 12:48 AM, said:

 

 

I'm not an alt of Panzer you *edited*. The fact that all you miss the point shows why WG can feed us so much *edited*. It's not about the rampant hacking it's exactly the point. It's about *edited* rng/spotting/camo system that WG states ''Wether you like it or not, it works''. Yeah my *edited* it works. They don't need to worry about fixing it either cause their *edited* riders will save them. 

 

Videos are 2 years old dude...

JuicyProduction #12 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:53 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 27140 battles
  • 274
  • [OMNI] OMNI
  • Member since:
    11-10-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 04 July 2017 - 11:52 PM, said:

 

Videos are 2 years old dude...

 

Yeah again. invisible tanks or not, the camo and spotting is still *edited* . Wg loves denying that tho.

Edited by Jbnn, 05 July 2017 - 06:37 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Tikoloshe_dbn #13 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:57 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 777 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    05-05-2015
I'm not an alt of Panzer you *edited*. The fact that all you miss the point shows why WG can feed us so much *edited*. It's not about the rampant hacking it's exactly the point. It's about *edited* rng/spotting/camo system that WG states ''Wether you like it or not, it works''. Yeah my *edited* it works. They don't need to worry about fixing it either cause their *edited* riders will save them. 

1ncompetenc3 #14 Posted 05 July 2017 - 12:59 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36772 battles
  • 11,489
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostJuicyProduction, on 05 July 2017 - 12:53 AM, said:

 

Yeah again. invisible tanks or not, the camo and spotting is still *edited*. Wg loves denying that tho.

 

Except I know for a fact that the first video is showing a bug that was found out about and fixed and therefore has nothing to do with what you're talking about. The second video was uploaded later but the battle may well be from the same period as the first and showing the same bug, again having nothing to do with what you're talking about.

What you're talking about has nothing to do with the topic of this thread, topic being that OP needs to do either more or less research into things he doesn't quite understand if he wants to make a point rather than immediately be told why he's being potato.



brumbarr #15 Posted 05 July 2017 - 01:07 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,293
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostJuicyProduction, on 05 July 2017 - 12:53 AM, said:

 

Yeah again. invisible tanks or not, the camo and spotting is still *edited*. Wg loves denying that tho.

 

Camo and spotting if working perfectly as intented. I would make some small changes but overal a good system.

Balc0ra #16 Posted 05 July 2017 - 01:49 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 62814 battles
  • 14,436
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

First video have been discussed to death as it's an old case. As indicated by the date. It's one of 4 rare cases that I know of WG did investigate. And it was indeed a server error. As in the server did not mark the enemy team as spotted to the friendly team's clients.. all of them. Even tho they were all spotted.

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=ysP4Ns-tI8I

This video shows the E50M and how their team saw it. You can see they don't see anyone. And suddenly later in the video, the server notices his mistake. And they all get spotted after they push past them.

 

Unless you are saying that 10 tanks on a random team all ran the same "hack" to not get spotted. If so... then why is not that "hack" more common if it was that easy?

I suspect the 2nd video is more or less the same. As in a server/client communication error. It's rare, and I've only seen it 2 times myself. Tho not for over 2 years.

 

View PostPanzerfaust123, on 05 July 2017 - 12:11 AM, said:

but theres no cheats in wot no no says the unicum! :izmena::izmena:

 

Then you go and find the "camo hack" they used. Let us know if you find anything. I suspect you won't.

 

 


Edited by Balc0ra, 05 July 2017 - 01:57 AM.


Unicums_Tast3_G00D #17 Posted 05 July 2017 - 02:13 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 17287 battles
  • 107
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    07-28-2011

https://www.youtube....h?v=gwiDWiEkiF4

 

enjoy 



1ncompetenc3 #18 Posted 05 July 2017 - 02:32 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36772 battles
  • 11,489
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostPanzerfaust123, on 05 July 2017 - 02:13 AM, said:

 

 

I don't actually see any evidence the enemy players aren't simply ignoring him in favour of the tanks in front of them, in fact the 263 specifically turns and fires at him (and does damage). Not to mention he's playing awfully cautious for someone who has confidence in his invisibility.

I'd be very surprised if that video isn't a prank. :rolleyes:



malachi6 #19 Posted 05 July 2017 - 02:54 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 48636 battles
  • 3,089
  • Member since:
    04-14-2011

View PostPanzerfaust123, on 05 July 2017 - 02:13 AM, said:

 

In other news, players get tunnel vision and someone plays on a clockwork PC.   In the words of Frank Drebben;  "nothing to see here, move along".

Strappster #20 Posted 05 July 2017 - 02:56 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 23609 battles
  • 8,782
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

View PostPanzerfaust123, on 05 July 2017 - 01:13 AM, said:

 

Wow! I'm impressed. Really, seriously impressed! With this thread you've managed to raise the bar for stupid so high that it'll be a long, long time before anyone gets even close. :ohmy:






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users