Jump to content


Update 9.19.1 Release


  • Please log in to reply
238 replies to this topic

Community #1 Posted 11 July 2017 - 03:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Content Team
  • 0 battles
  • 21,271
  • Member since:
    11-09-2011
Download the latest update to see arty return to Platoons and embark on revised Personal Missions.

The full text of the news item

SM1AK #2 Posted 11 July 2017 - 03:14 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 11007 battles
  • 86
  • [SLOEX] SLOEX
  • Member since:
    09-24-2013
and still no REAL fix to the MM problem!!! what about tier 8 and lower tanks... still get fed by the MM and are 99,9% bottom tier!!! the only good thing is that you gan join the platoon with SPG.

Edited by SM1AK, 11 July 2017 - 03:15 PM.


ortega456 #3 Posted 11 July 2017 - 03:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 50669 battles
  • 711
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012
How was the penetration indicator changed - what's new with that?

TijgernootTank #4 Posted 11 July 2017 - 03:47 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 37753 battles
  • 72
  • [TOURN] TOURN
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013

I keep saying any new patch with no new maps is dissapointing .

I also wonder , is it realy that hard to make all vehicles hd ?

For me there is no need , but is taking kind of long .

I wish there was no time invested in this and making [mini] maps in hd , but instead wg put some efforts in creating new maps ,

the game needs it .

Is it realy that hard to come up with some new maps ???

 



swatdennis #5 Posted 11 July 2017 - 03:49 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 7579 battles
  • 16
  • [N-AN] N-AN
  • Member since:
    12-13-2013
Am I the only one who liked the radio stutter in the female crew voices? It felt like they were actualy in a tank and not a random box that can have 100% clear crews with all the explosions and other ambient noices around...

Napad24356 #6 Posted 11 July 2017 - 03:50 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 23447 battles
  • 95
  • [-S-V-] -S-V-
  • Member since:
    01-22-2016
Some personal missions for SPG's have as a condition to stun enemy tanks for a period of time. In the post match stats there is no info for how much time did we stuned enemy tanks. Can you make it happen?

ThebaldEagle #7 Posted 11 July 2017 - 03:52 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 714 battles
  • 225
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014

View PostTijgernootTank, on 11 July 2017 - 03:47 PM, said:

I keep saying any new patch with no new maps is dissapointing .

I also wonder , is it realy that hard to make all vehicles hd ?

For me there is no need , but is taking kind of long .

I wish there was no time invested in this and making [mini] maps in hd , but instead wg put some efforts in creating new maps ,

the game needs it .

Is it realy that hard to come up with some new maps ???

 

 

If you followed what WG said we have to wait for new maps untill all maps are transfered into HD maps, so maby in a few years.

Block Quote

 Is it realy that hard to come up with some new maps

 Is it really so hard to read the news that WG gives.

 



BOBI221 #8 Posted 11 July 2017 - 03:52 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16135 battles
  • 8
  • Member since:
    08-04-2011
Poland tech tree hype

TiredOfYou #9 Posted 11 July 2017 - 03:56 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 12255 battles
  • 9
  • [ARMAS] ARMAS
  • Member since:
    09-09-2014

Hope the new MM gonna solve the problems with top/lower tier.

 



rabitson #10 Posted 11 July 2017 - 04:00 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21236 battles
  • 475
  • Member since:
    05-08-2014
Balls of Marian :B

1_doctor_death_1 #11 Posted 11 July 2017 - 04:04 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 2572 battles
  • 31
  • [-ACE] -ACE
  • Member since:
    03-13-2017

View PostBOBI221, on 11 July 2017 - 03:52 PM, said:

Poland tech tree hype

 

indeed



savijem #12 Posted 11 July 2017 - 04:06 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 49552 battles
  • 75
  • Member since:
    12-28-2014
cool

_Sigg_ #13 Posted 11 July 2017 - 04:12 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 35445 battles
  • 113
  • [OMNI] OMNI
  • Member since:
    08-25-2011
Maus and Type5 are rebalanced now I guess. I mean: It is the second patch after the overbuff, it's not possible they aren't rebelanced now, is it?

AC130Pilot #14 Posted 11 July 2017 - 04:31 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 12771 battles
  • 169
  • Member since:
    12-14-2013

SPG shells fly through tanks/disappear and DO NOT DEAL ANY DAMAGE past the maximum draw distance of the driven SPG...




Edited by AC130Pilot, 12 July 2017 - 05:39 PM.


WindSplitter1 #15 Posted 11 July 2017 - 04:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8188 battles
  • 959
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

Score 1 for SPG drivers...

  • Added the option of inviting an SPG to the Platoon (with a limitation of one SPG per Platoon).
  • Added convenient display of the allied SPG aiming area marker above objects and bridges.
  • Damage caused by allied SPGs to stunned enemy vehicles is now counted when calculating Marks of Excellence on the gun, together with damage caused to enemy vehicle upon track destruction and spotting, and the damage caused to the enemy vehicles.
  • Changed the conditions for Gore's Medal: 
    • added the lower threshold of 2,000 damage
    • reduced the upper damage threshold: now it is enough to cause damage exceeding eight times (instead of 10 times) the hit points of your vehicle to cause
  • Separate options for Battle Performance Badges and total damage log to stunned targets were added to the Battle Notifications tab.
  • Changed camera settings in the alternative aiming mode. Reduced camera sensitivity to minor irregularities.
  • Increased the amount of earned experience and credits for causing damage to stunned enemy vehicles by 20%.

Edited by WindSplitter1, 11 July 2017 - 04:45 PM.


Tilly042 #16 Posted 11 July 2017 - 04:41 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 22158 battles
  • 156
  • Member since:
    09-08-2012

View PostSM1AK, on 11 July 2017 - 02:14 PM, said:

and still no REAL fix to the MM problem!!! what about tier 8 and lower tanks... still get fed by the MM and are 99,9% bottom tier!!! the only good thing is that you gan join the platoon with SPG.

 

​You beat me to it.  That's the single main problem from my perspective.  Routinely bottom tier when playing tier 8 and up against tier Xs but WG have quite simply avoided it sorting it (again).

Eaglax #17 Posted 11 July 2017 - 04:56 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 17305 battles
  • 2,737
  • Member since:
    01-12-2012

Block Quote

 We saw a lot of confusion after stopping SPGs from entering and forming Platoons, and in hindsight, we could have explained the reasoning behind this decision a bit better.

good to see that you are finally capable of admitting mistakes :medal:

 

Block Quote

 Changed the mechanics of armour penetration indicator.

 How?

 

Block Quote

 Changed the vehicle display order (within a particular tier) by types in the team panels. The new display order: heavy tanks, medium tanks, tank destroyers, light tanks, SPGs. Within a type, the vehicles are sorted alphabetically.

 :sceptic:

 

Block Quote

 Matchmaking within particular tiers: The mismatch in the number of light tanks, tank destroyers, SPGs, and Platoons within each particular tier will be decreased.

 what about the problem of being low tiers most of the time? was this addressed too?

 



GheoCristea #18 Posted 11 July 2017 - 05:05 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 28200 battles
  • 4
  • [URSI] URSI
  • Member since:
    09-06-2015

The most usless patch ever, lool 


Edited by Jbnn, 12 July 2017 - 06:36 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to use of red


LastGod #19 Posted 11 July 2017 - 05:13 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 9065 battles
  • 14
  • [SOS_] SOS_
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011

I'd like to know a bit more about  "Changed the mechanics of armour penetration indicator." as well. Could you give some more details on it?



HansiVonHinten #20 Posted 11 July 2017 - 05:22 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 36397 battles
  • 239
  • [GA-DK] GA-DK
  • Member since:
    08-07-2013
Will 113 be replaced by WZ-111-5A ?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users