Jump to content


My Stats, good, bad, average?


  • Please log in to reply
63 replies to this topic

RolloLongjaw #1 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:08 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4238 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    12-23-2014

E100, 1936 battles. [without looking at my win percentage, as random battles, are my stats good, bad or average?]

 

 

Kill/Death Ratio 0.57
Damage Caused/Received 0.44
Average Number of Vehicles Destroyed per Battle 0.42
Average Damage Caused per Battle 985

 

Enemy vehicles destroyed 805
Experience 790,479
Maximum experience in a battle 1,445
Hits 67.02%
Damage Caused 1,908,307

Edited by RolloLongjaw, 12 July 2017 - 11:09 PM.


BabyR4ge #2 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:18 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 28423 battles
  • 44
  • [GSQT] GSQT
  • Member since:
    10-05-2010

Well ... thats about three shots of dmg per game. Do you think thats good bad or average ? 

 



RolloLongjaw #3 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:27 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4238 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    12-23-2014

I genuinely dont have a clue. So Im Bad to Terrible then? 

 

How does it compare to other E100 users with a similiar amount of random only battles?

 

I wouldnt know how to find that out. And I think thats the penultimate test.


Edited by RolloLongjaw, 12 July 2017 - 11:32 PM.


bstb3 #4 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:32 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38878 battles
  • 248
  • [VBRJ] VBRJ
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostFesterman, on 12 July 2017 - 10:18 PM, said:

Well ... thats about three shots of dmg per game. Do you think thats good bad or average ? 

 

 

With HE maybe, 985 dmg per battle. He will surely have the 150mm by now, with 750 alpha.

 

OP it's not nearly enough to be even close to carrying your own weight in battles, you have 2700 HP and good armour, managing to output less than 1k, when often facing lower tier tanks, is just poor. Sorry to say it, but it is. The good thing is asking the question and being aware and willing to do something about it. Try to focus on penning at least two non HE shots per game as a start - learn weakspots on the tanks you face a lot or just use HEAT like most other E100. Follow your team, watch what they do and do that - or look up some E100 guides on youtube etc. Never try to go alone anywhere, even an E100 is potato if it gets overrun.

 

Also, after 1936 battles in any tank win rate is a good measure of how you are helping your team, or not. Randomness is pretty much evened out by then with you being the only sole constant. 

 

edit to add - it doesn't matter what other people manage, it only matters what you should be trying to do. Which is at least 2k minimum really given the current mm in randoms (and even that will be said by many as too low).


Edited by bstb3, 12 July 2017 - 11:34 PM.


RolloLongjaw #5 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:38 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4238 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    12-23-2014

Its costing me about a tenner a week.  Im guessing. Do other people pay that?

 

Im thinking of jacking it. Love the game, but......meh.


Edited by RolloLongjaw, 12 July 2017 - 11:40 PM.


Noo_Noo #6 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:40 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 21651 battles
  • 2,048
  • Member since:
    05-05-2013

I use VBAddict to see where I'm at or what I should be aiming for. It usually makes me feel pretty crap but the numbers are there. 

For the E100 you should be looking at over 1900 damage per game which is the current average quoted. 

http://www.vbaddict..../heavy/e_100-37

 

Interestingly the E100 has gone through a bit of a slump in the last month with regard to Win rate. Very slight dip in damage but a real dip in penetration. More HE being used in the last month perhaps?

 



BravelyRanAway #7 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:40 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22575 battles
  • 9,335
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostRolloLongjaw, on 12 July 2017 - 10:08 PM, said:

E100, 1936 battles. [without looking at my win percentage, as random battles, are my stats good, bad or average?]

You know the answer already....so why make this topic?



gpalsson #8 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:41 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 22134 battles
  • 8,117
  • Member since:
    04-13-2013

Not gonna lie, it's not great.

 



BravelyRanAway #9 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:41 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22575 battles
  • 9,335
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostRolloLongjaw, on 12 July 2017 - 10:38 PM, said:

Its costing me about a tenner a week.  Im guessing. Do other people pay that?

 

Im thinking of jacking it. Love the game, but......meh.

 

OK.....so, a thread by someone looking for a neg reaction.....congratz!

TungstenHitman #10 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:42 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 22172 battles
  • 4,069
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016

View PostFesterman, on 12 July 2017 - 10:18 PM, said:

Well ... thats about three shots of dmg per game. Do you think thats good bad or average ? 

 

If it's a tank with a really slow [edited]reload and a big ol boom stick lick a KV2... probably not too bad actually



RolloLongjaw #11 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:43 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4238 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    12-23-2014
No, I really dont. I just play.....thats it.

BabyR4ge #12 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:44 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 28423 battles
  • 44
  • [GSQT] GSQT
  • Member since:
    10-05-2010

Hey man .. The game can be fun, so I still like a months prem acc at a time. My point about your stats was how do you feel, dont get caught up chasing stats in a game mate. If it's fun and you enjoy it, then play it :) I may have worded my first response badly o7

 



conductiv #13 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:45 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Beta Tester
  • 33678 battles
  • 3,338
  • [FIFO] FIFO
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010

View PostRolloLongjaw, on 12 July 2017 - 11:08 PM, said:

E100, 1936 battles. [without looking at my win percentage, as random battles, are my stats good, bad or average?]

 

 

Kill/Death Ratio 0.57
Damage Caused/Received 0.44
Average Number of Vehicles Destroyed per Battle 0.42
Average Damage Caused per Battle 985

 

Enemy vehicles destroyed 805
Experience 790,479
Maximum experience in a battle 1,445
Hits 67.02%
Damage Caused 1,908,307

 

for tier 10 vehicles 2K damage average is the baseline goal, you are well below the target line on that. your average damage per game on the vehicle is somewhere between the tier 6 and 7 line, especially for a vehicle you have played so often.

 

what is the most common cause of demise, being too aggressive or being too passive, or other instances like trying to solo a flank?

 



BravelyRanAway #14 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:47 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22575 battles
  • 9,335
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostRolloLongjaw, on 12 July 2017 - 10:43 PM, said:

No, I really dont. I just play.....thats it.

 

At a tenner a week.......you're the argument against it being P2W.

Seriously.......there is no need to spend a penny on this game....my other accounts on which I have spent nothing have better stats than my main.......this leads me to believe that knowledge of how the game works trumps spending money on it.



RolloLongjaw #15 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:50 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4238 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    12-23-2014

Ive watched the vids on youtube. I had a game the other day, where i had six tanks firing at me, and i was angling it right, they were all bouncing as i was retreating and then counter attacking, using the landscape. i was thinking yeh!  

am i too aggresive? sometimes. yeh. 

do i follow other e100s yeh. 

I now hwere some of the tanks weak spots are. I started using heat less often. and had some success. I have loads of medals. [i guess they mean diddly] I mean i have good games. or so i thought. obviously i dont. and i do not know why

I scored over 4000 the other day..

 

I just dont get it tbh. Obviously they are bad stats, so thanks for that info anyway. 


Edited by RolloLongjaw, 12 July 2017 - 11:54 PM.


CoDiGGo #16 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:52 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14997 battles
  • 569
  • [NEUR0] NEUR0
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015
You should be playing tier 5 (occasional tier 6) learning the basics of the game. And when you manage those tiers slowly go up.

BravelyRanAway #17 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:56 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22575 battles
  • 9,335
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostRolloLongjaw, on 12 July 2017 - 10:50 PM, said:

Ive watched the vids on youtube. I had a game the other day, where i had six tanks firing at me, and i was angling it right, they were all bouncing as i was retreating and then counter attacking, using the landscape. i was thinking yeh!  

 

It's quite difficult to be in a position where you have six tanks fire at you. You're doing something wrong.

RolloLongjaw #18 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:56 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4238 battles
  • 67
  • Member since:
    12-23-2014
everyone else was dead. and it was on a corner

Edited by RolloLongjaw, 12 July 2017 - 11:56 PM.


BravelyRanAway #19 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:57 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22575 battles
  • 9,335
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostRolloLongjaw, on 12 July 2017 - 10:56 PM, said:

everyone else was dead. and it was on a corner

 

Base camping never ends well.:(

TungstenHitman #20 Posted 12 July 2017 - 11:57 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 22172 battles
  • 4,069
  • Member since:
    08-28-2016
Too early to say fairly tbh.. I mean you don't have so many battles overall so we all tend to have bot performances grinding out trashy stock tanks and crew so the stats only start giving a truly accurate reflection from the point the tank is fully upgraded and crew are decent with some skills but overall if I try to use kill and damage ratio's at 2:1 so if I kill 2 for every 1 of me and damage twice as much as I receive on average.. I think this sort of stats approach is not so bad and not a burden on a team.. if I do this and during the important moments of a battle then even if we lose I feel I have my part and anything I do after that is a bonus and just further increasing the likelihood of the win but some teammates make even a very strong personal performance still very hard to win.. some don't really think about what they're doing and that's a fast way to get killed and put pressure on your team




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users