Jump to content


T-34-3 - are ya ready boys

#praiseSerb

  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

PricelessPlayingPancake #1 Posted 13 July 2017 - 02:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 15137 battles
  • 667
  • [CIRC] CIRC
  • Member since:
    01-24-2011

 

:justwait: HD Armah, better aiming time .......



ares354 #2 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:00 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 72409 battles
  • 2,577
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010
So WG buff on Type 59 aim time to 2,3 sec and on 122 mm gun on T34-3 to 2.9, but T34-2 still have no hull armor, and 2.9 sec aim time on 100 mm gun and will have same aim time on 122 as T34-3 but worse rof and acc then T34-3...Yea cool balance WG. [edited]T34-2

And yet again, WG add more pen to med and make Panther 88 pointless. Patton 59 problem is that big commander hatch, and they buff pen...just pointless. 

monthey_ #3 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34064 battles
  • 626
  • [MAROC] MAROC
  • Member since:
    04-24-2011
Dang finally I can take out the type for a spin and actually start earning credits again with it. 2.3 sec aim time makes a HUGE difference!

Edited by monthey_, 13 July 2017 - 03:01 PM.


qpranger #4 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:04 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30715 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
What about penetration FFS ????

_EXODUZ_ #5 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:05 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34165 battles
  • 1,935
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

View Postares354, on 13 July 2017 - 03:00 PM, said:

So WG buff on Type 59 aim time to 2,3 sec and on 122 mm gun on T34-3 to 2.9, but T34-2 still have no hull armor, and 2.9 sec aim time on 100 mm gun and will have same aim time on 122 as T34-3 but worse rof and acc then T34-3...Yea cool balance WG. [edited]T34-2

And yet again, WG add more pen to med and make Panther 88 pointless. Patton 59 problem is that big commander hatch, and they buff pen...just pointless. 

 

You're never happy are you?

Kozzy #6 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:06 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 38512 battles
  • 2,302
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View Postqpranger, on 13 July 2017 - 02:04 PM, said:

What about penetration FFS ????

 

Although I would love the T34-3 to get a penetration buff I imagine WG are worried that they will then have to buff that gun in all its iterations (IS6, su100?, KV3? etc).

qpranger #7 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:07 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30715 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
I am not greedy, 190mm would suffice.

ares354 #8 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:08 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 72409 battles
  • 2,577
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 13 July 2017 - 03:05 PM, said:

 

You're never happy are you?

 

Look on T34-2 pls, look on aim time of his guns, on both guns he use, and tell me this tank is balanced. How can I be happy, if WG dont buff ONE tank that is not premium and badly need this buff. Or you will tell me that T34-2 is very good tank. 

IF those tank needed buff, this is first who should get over them. 

Edited by ares354, 13 July 2017 - 03:09 PM.


_EXODUZ_ #9 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:13 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34165 battles
  • 1,935
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

View Postares354, on 13 July 2017 - 03:08 PM, said:

 

Look on T34-2 pls, look on aim time of his guns, on both guns he use, and tell me this tank is balanced. How can I be happy, if WG dont buff ONE tank that is not premium and badly need this buff. Or you will tell me that T34-2 is very good tank. 

IF those tank needed buff, this is first who should get over them. 

 

Why would you effing care about T34-2 with 67k battles? You probably have enough tanks unlocked, no? You played this game for 7 friggin' years, your emotional attachment to certain aspects doesn't look healthy at all.

qpranger #10 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:14 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30715 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
T34-2 is an oft overlooked little gem.

ares354 #11 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:16 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 72409 battles
  • 2,577
  • Member since:
    12-05-2010

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 13 July 2017 - 03:13 PM, said:

 

Why would you effing care about T34-2 with 67k battles? You probably have enough tanks unlocked, no? You played this game for 7 friggin' years, your emotional attachment to certain aspects doesn't look healthy at all.

 

So ofc, I should be saying WG is good company ,they buff premium tanks that people pay over tanks that people dont need to pay to play with...

And WG says WoT is not p2w game, but from 4 tier 8 chinese MT only one that dont get buff in non premium one. Not p2w at all....

Edited by ares354, 13 July 2017 - 03:16 PM.


spuriousmonkey #12 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:19 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 42855 battles
  • 3,201
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    06-23-2011
Never bought the t34-2 because even i don't want to play that.

Search_Warrant #13 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:26 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 25990 battles
  • 5,320
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

They buffed it's armor thats cool and all but the shape is still bigger than Type 59, so no the armor is STILL not as good as Type 59, Type 59 is still FASTER and i think they weigh the same for some reason. if i dont see the cupolas changed from the garbage 120 to 150 like Type 59 its still useless, the 50mm armor on the gun hole needs to be fixed and Type 59 can have that gun bloom/aimtime buff when they remove the "totally historical" -7 gun depression, again, making the type 59 armor actually better due to more slope.

 

Nice Try WG. but you cant polish a turd, it will still be utter trash in the end, 175pen sluggish medium is still just a poor mans Type 59 and a inferior 112 or WZ-111 in every aspect.


Edited by Search_Warrant, 13 July 2017 - 03:27 PM.


signal11th #14 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:33 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33901 battles
  • 5,246
  • [E-BAY] E-BAY
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011
Problem with the t-34-3 was never dispersion or hull armor it was crap pen. Why do WG always buff the stuff that was never a problem in the first place.

Search_Warrant #15 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:40 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 25990 battles
  • 5,320
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    02-08-2011

View Postsignal11th, on 13 July 2017 - 02:33 PM, said:

Problem with the t-34-3 was never dispersion or hull armor it was crap pen. Why do WG always buff the stuff that was never a problem in the first place.

 

i could make 175pen work if the guns aimtime/dispersion wasent so horrible. hitting where i needed to was mor important than actual pen in most cases. tho a pen buff would be welcome. as the heavies get armor at least and this should be all about the gun.

signal11th #16 Posted 13 July 2017 - 03:42 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33901 battles
  • 5,246
  • [E-BAY] E-BAY
  • Member since:
    07-14-2011

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 13 July 2017 - 02:40 PM, said:

 

i could make 175pen work if the guns aimtime/dispersion wasent so horrible. hitting where i needed to was mor important than actual pen in most cases. tho a pen buff would be welcome. as the heavies get armor at least and this should be all about the gun.

 

Being able to aim somewhere quicker on a tank you can't pen isn't really a buff is it... type 4 I'm looking at you....

Gkirmathal #17 Posted 13 July 2017 - 04:15 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 8125 battles
  • 1,466
  • Member since:
    01-14-2013

175 pen on tier 8, SMM or normal MM, still blows and is always gonna blow.

 

View Postsignal11th, on 13 July 2017 - 02:33 PM, said:

Problem with the t-34-3 was never dispersion or hull armor it was crap pen. Why do WG always buff the stuff that was never a problem in the first place.

 

As that would mean reworking and editing more than 1 XML vehicle file, which you know is clearly something WG has been allergic for for several years, maybe since birth.

Edited by Gkirmathal, 13 July 2017 - 04:19 PM.


PricelessPlayingPancake #18 Posted 13 July 2017 - 04:16 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Beta Tester
  • 15137 battles
  • 667
  • [CIRC] CIRC
  • Member since:
    01-24-2011

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 13 July 2017 - 02:26 PM, said:

They buffed it's armor thats cool and all but the shape is still bigger than Type 59, so no the armor is STILL not as good as Type 59, Type 59 is still FASTER and i think they weigh the same for some reason. if i dont see the cupolas changed from the garbage 120 to 150 like Type 59 its still useless, the 50mm armor on the gun hole needs to be fixed and Type 59 can have that gun bloom/aimtime buff when they remove the "totally historical" -7 gun depression, again, making the type 59 armor actually better due to more slope.

 

Nice Try WG. but you cant polish a turd, it will still be utter trash in the end, 175pen sluggish medium is still just a poor mans Type 59 and a inferior 112 or WZ-111 in every aspect.

 

Chasis will be idenical to Type 59 (look at hd model in these pictures) . Angling looks the same to my eyes, only textures looks different with some added goodies :)  So armor will become the same actually.

Edited by PricelessPlayingPancake, 13 July 2017 - 04:17 PM.


WindSplitter1 #19 Posted 13 July 2017 - 04:20 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14295 battles
  • 1,720
  • [RYNO] RYNO
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostSearch_Warrant, on 13 July 2017 - 02:40 PM, said:

 

i could make 175pen work if the guns aimtime/dispersion wasent so horrible. hitting where i needed to was mor important than actual pen in most cases. tho a pen buff would be welcome. as the heavies get armor at least and this should be all about the gun.

 

Pretty much the only reason why I haven't bought the T-34-3 is this. Accuracy is simply too poor. And I don't see anything here that suggests something will be done accordingly.

gpalsson #20 Posted 13 July 2017 - 04:30 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 22107 battles
  • 8,117
  • Member since:
    04-13-2013
Sweet. My T-34-3 has been pretty unused for a year or more. Even though 175 pen is still too little, the armor and dispersion buffs will make it a better tank.

Edited by gpalsson, 13 July 2017 - 04:31 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users