Jump to content


What should WG "fix" next?

fix the game or not

  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

Poll: WG "To-do" list (115 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

What should WG fix next to make the game more playable? (Select all that apply)

  1. Matchmaking/Tier VIII (33 votes [28.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.70%

  2. Powercreep (15 votes [13.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.04%

  3. Do more for the British Nation (9 votes [7.83%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.83%

  4. Premium ammunition/Terminate "pay-to-win" before it aggravates (23 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  5. Maps (despite what they already said about HD maps) (14 votes [12.17%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.17%

  6. Revise weak spot policy (5 votes [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

  7. Balancing of tanks that critically need it (5 votes [4.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.35%

  8. Introduce Frontline Game Mode (1 vote [0.87%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.87%

  9. Redo Strongholds/Clan Wars (3 votes [2.61%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.61%

  10. Sell/reintroduce specific/premium vehicles (1 vote [0.87%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.87%

  11. Something else (please describe in comments) (6 votes [5.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.22%

Vote Hide poll

WindSplitter1 #1 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:09 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 15544 battles
  • 2,278
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

As above.

 

I will ask two things:

  1. Don't mention arty (it was already touched)
  2. Ignore my signature about arty

Edited by WindSplitter1, 14 July 2017 - 08:34 PM.


1ncompetenc3 #2 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:21 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36897 battles
  • 11,490
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013
I'm torn between rebalancing vehicles (not just bringing obsolete stuff up to snuff but reducing power creep as well) and doing away with 3-5-7 MM. I think those are the most pressing issues right now, though unfortunately rebalancing all the old tanks will take a very long time, powercreep is good for business so not going to change, and WG either doesn't understand or doesn't care about the problems created by their 3-5-7, heavies are mediums MM shenanigans.

Edited by 1ncompetenc3, 14 July 2017 - 08:31 PM.


TsunamiFM #3 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:21 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18800 battles
  • 309
  • [SNAKE] SNAKE
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011
I would also add one small thing to help identifying premium shells abusers: display % of premium shells people use in their statistics, both globally and per tank. Would be nice to see how people are getting their WR.

Tarix819 #4 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:23 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 15743 battles
  • 191
  • Member since:
    04-26-2014

WG won't fix anything unless it benefits their wallet.

 

I imagine the next 'fix' WG is going to implement would be +100mm of armour to all Russian tanks, and then a 10% speed reduction to all British tanks because 'together we can improve the gameplay experience'

 

There probably will never be any new tank lines ever again as well, since WG could create 10 new premium tanks with the money used to create one tank line.


Edited by Tarix819, 14 July 2017 - 08:24 PM.


HundeWurst #5 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:25 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 67756 battles
  • 4,281
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

Wait what?

 

Wargaming managed to fix something in the last 3 years? Today I learnt something.



Press2ForSkill #6 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:26 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 1 battle
  • 689
  • Member since:
    06-01-2016
How do i "select" all that apply when there is max 1 option i can choose?

Dr_ownape #7 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:28 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 41926 battles
  • 5,386
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View PostWunderWurst, on 14 July 2017 - 07:25 PM, said:

Wait what?

 

Wargaming managed to fix something in the last 3 years? Today I learnt something.

 

No he missed the "". read it now...

 

What should WG "fix" next



FluffyRedFox #8 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:29 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 22621 battles
  • 8,118
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

A lot.



TsunamiFM #9 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:30 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18800 battles
  • 309
  • [SNAKE] SNAKE
  • Member since:
    10-23-2011

View PostTarix819, on 14 July 2017 - 08:23 PM, said:

WG won't fix anything unless it benefits their wallet.

 

Not fixing things can make some people stop paying and playing at some point - that can affect their wallets, too.

WindSplitter1 #10 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:30 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 15544 battles
  • 2,278
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

 

View PostPress2ForSkill, on 14 July 2017 - 07:26 PM, said:

How do i "select" all that apply when there is max 1 option i can choose?

 

Fixed. Thank you.

MarcoStrapone #11 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:31 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34062 battles
  • 712
  • [-GODS] -GODS
  • Member since:
    08-11-2013
their own brains.

WindSplitter1 #12 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:32 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 15544 battles
  • 2,278
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostTsunamiFM, on 14 July 2017 - 07:21 PM, said:

I would also add one small thing to help identifying premium shells abusers: display % of premium shells people use in their statistics, both globally and per tank. Would be nice to see how people are getting their WR.

 

This is a very interesting idea. Not only that as would also constitute evidence to determine what actually happens in a battle. And displaying these stats per battle would also be a good addition.

They've stated during the Q&A that premium shells account for 2% or so? I find that hard to believe... :/

 

Since they won't do without the stats, they mind as well add to it.



qpranger #13 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:39 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 31524 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
Shame on you OP, where is the "eliminate world hunger" option?

Alabamatick #14 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:47 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31849 battles
  • 2,965
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011

Can we vote for 3 things pls

 

ie > power-creep / maps / weak spot policy

 

actually there's > 3 things they can re-ruin next, but that's the 3 i would've voted for



1ncompetenc3 #15 Posted 14 July 2017 - 08:49 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36897 battles
  • 11,490
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View Postqpranger, on 14 July 2017 - 08:39 PM, said:

Shame on you OP, where is the "eliminate world hunger" option?

 

Now's not the time for genocide.

arthurwellsley #16 Posted 14 July 2017 - 09:15 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 51268 battles
  • 2,814
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011

1. Chieftain

2. M60A1 USA medium line

3. French second heavy line

4. Italians

5. Historical battles

6. 30 x 30 mode

 

Bring back CW, do not bother with ranked or bonds.



WindSplitter1 #17 Posted 14 July 2017 - 09:18 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 15544 battles
  • 2,278
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View Postqpranger, on 14 July 2017 - 07:39 PM, said:

Shame on you OP, where is the "eliminate world hunger" option?

 

I'll add that option only when you stop putting clickbait titles on your threads :D

Enderman21 #18 Posted 14 July 2017 - 09:21 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26607 battles
  • 274
  • [-BSF-] -BSF-
  • Member since:
    11-11-2012
I think WG maybe should fix the game.

Suurpolskija #19 Posted 14 July 2017 - 09:30 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18692 battles
  • 1,642
  • [URHO] URHO
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016

It would be awesome if they'd make a stats page like WoWs has:

 

Suurpolskija is a mega noob that fires mostly gold.

He plays a lot of low tiers because he can't handle anything above tier VII.

He also bots skypigs because he's a **** ***** and a ***** tomato and **** irl.

 

I mean, I played my first random games at WoWs today and (obviously) went to some random page to see how I was doing and it said:

 

"Suurpolskija Mostly plays cruisers, especially low-tier and is excellent in them Deals an extremely large amount of damage Extremely often finishes damaged enemies Key vehicle - Novik"

 

How cool is that?

 

Edit: Btw, if some of you haven't tried the ships, the random battles at low tiers are 2/3 REAL bots, so I guess that generic evaluation of my stellar performance at tier 2 might not be very accurate measure of my very poor skills. :hiding:


Edited by Suurpolskija, 14 July 2017 - 09:37 PM.


qpranger #20 Posted 14 July 2017 - 09:40 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 31524 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostWindSplitter1, on 14 July 2017 - 10:18 PM, said:

 

I'll add that option only when you stop putting clickbait titles on your threads :D

 

Ha.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users