Jump to content


VMX mod.


  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

ZlatanArKung #1 Posted 15 July 2017 - 04:38 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

What do you think about XVM mod, and it showing stets for some while others get it removed for unknown reasons.

 

I also feel the mod causes a division among the players which is inherently banned.

I don't think we should get divided but rather unify against that mod.



Shnuks #2 Posted 15 July 2017 - 04:42 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 36686 battles
  • 4,990
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    06-16-2012
I agree that the VXM mod is creating unnecessary divides between the players!

Pandabird #3 Posted 15 July 2017 - 04:43 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33973 battles
  • 4,526
  • [KOFF] KOFF
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013

This post has been removed by the divide


Edited by Pandabird, 15 July 2017 - 04:50 PM.


Makotti #4 Posted 15 July 2017 - 04:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Beta Tester
  • 13719 battles
  • 274
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    10-04-2010
But why ? VMX is bestest mod in the game. Oh boy, I can't really play my SPG's without it, you can't imagine the thrill of hunt when you a literally waiting minutes to get that purple LT on your sights.

Eaglax #5 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:11 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 18992 battles
  • 3,485
  • Member since:
    01-12-2012
:ohmy: wow.... a completely new topic, I can't remember a single person who has thought about that and I have never seen a thread about this matter

Shnuks #6 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:13 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 36686 battles
  • 4,990
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    06-16-2012
This mod only serves to make people angry without providing anything beneficial to the game as a whole....

Edited by Shnuks, 15 July 2017 - 05:13 PM.


gpalsson #7 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:19 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 22134 battles
  • 8,117
  • Member since:
    04-13-2013

Some versions hands out warning points, and can even lead to bans.

Or so I heard :angry:

That's why I don't use it.

Just say no to that mod. And (some) drugs too.


Edited by gpalsson, 15 July 2017 - 05:20 PM.


Shnuks #8 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:20 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 36686 battles
  • 4,990
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    06-16-2012

View Postgpalsson, on 15 July 2017 - 05:19 PM, said:

Some versions hands out warning points, and can even lead to bans.

Or so I heard :angry:

 

WG never really explain the rules of this mod. Some times its legal, sometimes illegal. Sometimes you get banned, sometimes warned, sometimes nothing. This mod creates a lot of confusion.

gpalsson #9 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:35 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 22134 battles
  • 8,117
  • Member since:
    04-13-2013

View PostShnuks, on 15 July 2017 - 04:20 PM, said:

 

WG never really explain the rules of this mod. Some times its legal, sometimes illegal. Sometimes you get banned, sometimes warned, sometimes nothing. This mod creates a lot of confusion.

I member in the old days, mod4fun was mostly called BigBadBot and that was some true RNG if it would get you banned or not.


Edited by gpalsson, 15 July 2017 - 05:45 PM.


captainpigg #10 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:43 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31184 battles
  • 824
  • [F-DIV] F-DIV
  • Member since:
    02-22-2014

View PostEaglax, on 15 July 2017 - 04:11 PM, said:

:ohmy: wow.... a completely new topic, I can't remember a single person who has thought about that and I have never seen a thread about this matter

 



ZlatanArKung #11 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:51 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View Postgpalsson, on 15 July 2017 - 05:19 PM, said:

Some versions hands out warning points, and can even lead to bans.

Or so I heard :angry:

That's why I don't use it.

Just say no to that mod. And (some) drugs too.

 

Ye. Really hard to use properly really.

And then we have the focus it provides on certain players, which is just bizarre imo.

 

Let's hope WG ban that mod.



Endranii_PL #12 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:51 PM

    Captain

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 23644 battles
  • 2,223
  • Member since:
    04-02-2011
I really appreciate the idea behind the VMX mod as it was a well thought and game needed change in that aspect, but the time has definitely proved to be bad in it's implementation leading mostly to not only dividing player's but also to oppression of certain players.

1ncompetenc3 #13 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:55 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36897 battles
  • 11,492
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013
I don't really have an issue with the VMX mod, or with some other recently surfacing mods with a similar function. There's a level of predictability to the randomness that wasn't always there in earlier iterations. It might not be a perfect mod, but it usually seems to be doing the job without much RNG influence at least from what I've seen.

Long_Range_Sniper #14 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:59 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 31882 battles
  • 8,625
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-04-2011

As a skill based mod I find it somewhat lacking.

 

It needs to consider more data, and how players are using it. Just because players are targeting a particular player doesn't make the data wrong. 

 

I'd suggest that if the player wanted to avoid being targeted then they need to adapt their approach.



GekkoGordon #15 Posted 15 July 2017 - 05:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 4085 battles
  • 275
  • [-VUK-] -VUK-
  • Member since:
    04-17-2012

I like how some posters think that the most important thing about another post is if it is made by a reroll or not, and if it is a reroll, it has to be pointed out at first. This also removes every credibility of the reroller and whatever he have written in some way. Thus any argument the so called reroller does is invalid/irrelevant and should just be ignored, no matter what he has written and no matter what kind of evidence he brings.

Because, after all, he is a reroller. So he must be a stetobsessed scrub of some sort.



ZlatanArKung #16 Posted 15 July 2017 - 06:02 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostLong_Range_Sniper, on 15 July 2017 - 05:59 PM, said:

As a skill based mod I find it somewhat lacking.

 

It needs to consider more data, and how players are using it. Just because players are targeting a particular player doesn't make the data wrong. 

 

I'd suggest that if the player wanted to avoid being targeted then they need to adapt their approach.

 

Though, when you are targeted despite playing on the map and dont even use climbs or other moves which could be questioned, I find said mod is definitely bad.

 

How do you suggest such approach should be changed?

 

View PostGekkoGordon, on 15 July 2017 - 05:59 PM, said:

I like how some posters think that the most important thing about another post is if it is made by a reroll or not, and if it is a reroll, it has to be pointed out at first. This also removes every credibility of the reroller and whatever he have written in some way. Thus any argument the so called reroller does is invalid/irrelevant and should just be ignored, no matter what he has written and no matter what kind of evidence he brings.

Because, after all, he is a reroller. So he must be a stetobsessed scrub of some sort.

 

Who wrote that [edited]?


 

GekkoGordon #17 Posted 15 July 2017 - 06:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 4085 battles
  • 275
  • [-VUK-] -VUK-
  • Member since:
    04-17-2012

View PostZlatanArKung, on 15 July 2017 - 07:03 PM, said:

 

Who wrote that [edited]?

 

Some stetpedder reroll :medal:

ZlatanArKung #18 Posted 15 July 2017 - 06:07 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostGekkoGordon, on 15 July 2017 - 06:05 PM, said:

 

Some stetpedder reroll :medal:

Oh. They always try to justify their rerolling. ..



WindSpIitter1 #19 Posted 15 July 2017 - 06:11 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 277 battles
  • 1,035
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    01-13-2017
I don't like mods, mods should be banned

Long_Range_Sniper #20 Posted 15 July 2017 - 06:11 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 31882 battles
  • 8,625
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-04-2011

View PostZlatanArKung, on 15 July 2017 - 05:02 PM, said:

How do you suggest such approach should be changed?

 

I'd suggest before trying to get people to follow you as their leader, that swearing less, and not being a pain in

 

 planet_map_names-uranus.png

 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users