Jump to content


Getting boring.


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

IDFdk #1 Posted 16 July 2017 - 05:58 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 33136 battles
  • 9
  • [-NFD-] -NFD-
  • Member since:
    09-18-2011

I started my first game back in sept 2011, and played around 30K games.

done most in the game, and had alot of fun and of course alot of crap as well, but i never ever got bored before.


 

I log on and play the same maps over and over and over. OMG release the maps that you removed and you could add a: choosewhat 3 maps not to play in random matches.

But come on, if there is snow or not, it is still the same map.

 If you need to revamp the old maps before releasing them again, then for the love of god get moving. Also if a map is bit unfair, players should get a 50/50 change on the good/bad side.


 

Also you know the new MM is not working right, i see and hear from guilders that more game then before end with a higher kill diff. between the Winner/loser, like 15 to 3....


 

last could you player revamp arty and add a smoke Shell to them, it would add a great thing and change have maps are played so ever game look less like the last, i would think.


 

So like i say, im not angry or mad about anything, JUST GETTING REALY BORED.
 


 

and bored gamers look elsewhere, and i hope that dont have to be the case.


 

have a great week.
 


 


 



qpranger #2 Posted 16 July 2017 - 06:00 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30751 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
One very simple thing WG could do to make gameplay more interesting is sometimes switch map laoyouts to their mirror images.

Browarszky #3 Posted 16 July 2017 - 06:34 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 14906 battles
  • 2,765
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View Postqpranger, on 16 July 2017 - 05:00 PM, said:

One very simple thing WG could do to make gameplay more interesting is sometimes switch map laoyouts to their mirror images.

 

:ohmy:

RamRaid90 #4 Posted 16 July 2017 - 06:45 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19698 battles
  • 5,868
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View Postqpranger, on 16 July 2017 - 05:00 PM, said:

One very simple thing WG could do to make gameplay more interesting is sometimes switch map laoyouts to their mirror images.

 

So ... what you mean is...sometimes you could be on the red team?....HUH...wonder if they've ever thought of that :facepalm:

1ncompetenc3 #5 Posted 16 July 2017 - 06:58 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36772 battles
  • 11,489
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013
I seriously wonder how people who look at the map pool as the biggest problem with this game see the world. It must be mind blowing.

_EXODUZ_ #6 Posted 16 July 2017 - 07:01 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34165 battles
  • 1,935
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014
I'm happy about every single map that got removed, they were so bad.

GeneralJock #7 Posted 16 July 2017 - 07:25 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 13992 battles
  • 552
  • Member since:
    11-06-2011

The game is utter bollocks now.

Put it this way: I am a fairly poor player, perhaps okay in a few tanks.

My crapness does not even have time to make an impact in most games.

It's arcade tanks with OP T67's shooting around, or if it's higher tiers Russky meds going like formula 1 with their bouncy turrets and stupid reload times.

Scores are repeatedly the same... 15-2...3-15... 4-15... all over in less than 5 minutes most times.

I took a break for 6 months then came back, it seemed okay, but now.... just a waste of time.

This should be called "Utterly Random World of Random (with some tanks)"

 



WindSplitter1 #8 Posted 16 July 2017 - 07:38 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14306 battles
  • 1,729
  • [RYNO] RYNO
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View Post1ncompetenc3, on 16 July 2017 - 05:58 PM, said:

I seriously wonder how people who look at the map pool as the biggest problem with this game see the world. It must be mind blowing.

 

Some people are easy to please.

Some don't see goldspam, arty, powercreep or everything else you can name as a problem.



_EXODUZ_ #9 Posted 16 July 2017 - 08:22 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34165 battles
  • 1,935
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

View PostWindSplitter1, on 16 July 2017 - 07:38 PM, said:

 

Some don't see goldspam, arty, powercreep or everything else you can name as a problem.

 

Yea like me



Jigabachi #10 Posted 16 July 2017 - 08:31 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17753 battles
  • 17,651
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View Post1ncompetenc3, on 16 July 2017 - 06:58 PM, said:

I seriously wonder how people who look at the map pool as the biggest problem with this game see the world. It must be mind blowing.

Speaking for myself, the mapdesign is my no.1 problem. Simply because mapdesign is one of THE biggest balancing factors in the game.

Proper mapdesign would improve a lot of the problems the game has. By a lot.



1ncompetenc3 #11 Posted 16 July 2017 - 08:41 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36772 battles
  • 11,489
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostJigabachi, on 16 July 2017 - 08:31 PM, said:

Speaking for myself, the mapdesign is my no.1 problem. Simply because mapdesign is one of THE biggest balancing factors in the game.

Proper mapdesign would improve a lot of the problems the game has. By a lot.

 

IMO general powercreep has surpassed map design as being the biggest issue. Better maps would make superheavies less idiotic because more mobile tanks would actually be able to flank them but that doesn't help tanks that were never supposed to flank in the first place. There's something special about coming across a tank of the same tier and class and knowing you can't pen with AP, can pen maybe 1 in 10 shots with APCR if you sacrifice a tomato orchard to RNGesus first, and do literally 0 damage with HE.

1ucky #12 Posted 16 July 2017 - 08:51 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 67509 battles
  • 451
  • Member since:
    11-05-2013

They said they're working on it. :P

Seriously though, I guess they really are. Goal is to make them all HD, maybe some of the old ones will come back then, albeit in a somewhat rebalanced state...

In any case, just hope it won't take them too long, - but to be fair, it could take years, who knows?

 

(They might hurry it up if we complain enough, perhaps. => Keep posting about it! ;))


Edited by 1ucky, 16 July 2017 - 08:54 PM.


wsatnutter #13 Posted 16 July 2017 - 09:10 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 24001 battles
  • 7,031
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
29933 just saying just in case

1ncompetenc3 #14 Posted 16 July 2017 - 09:15 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36772 battles
  • 11,489
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View Post1ucky, on 16 July 2017 - 08:51 PM, said:

They said they're working on it. :P

Seriously though, I guess they really are. Goal is to make them all HD, maybe some of the old ones will come back then, albeit in a somewhat rebalanced state...

In any case, just hope it won't take them too long, - but to be fair, it could take years, who knows?

 

(They might hurry it up if we complain enough, perhaps. => Keep posting about it! ;))

 

Adding all those temples and castles will probably take them quite some time.

Browarszky #15 Posted 16 July 2017 - 09:24 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 14906 battles
  • 2,765
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

View Post1ncompetenc3, on 16 July 2017 - 08:15 PM, said:

 

Adding all those temples and castles will probably take them quite some time.

 

Ah.. the castles.. I had forgotten about them.

ellua #16 Posted 16 July 2017 - 09:28 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 1160 battles
  • 555
  • Member since:
    09-29-2011

Bored?

 



WindSplitter1 #17 Posted 16 July 2017 - 10:29 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14306 battles
  • 1,729
  • [RYNO] RYNO
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 16 July 2017 - 07:22 PM, said:

 

Yea like me

 

Same as me




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users