Jump to content


Fast one sided slaughters?


  • Please log in to reply
123 replies to this topic

Poll: Slaughtering pace of battles (174 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 250 battles in order to participate this poll.

Do you think the battle matches end faster than in the past ?

  1. Yes (118 votes [67.82%])

    Percentage of vote: 67.82%

  2. No (56 votes [32.18%])

    Percentage of vote: 32.18%

Do you think the battle matches end more often in results of 10-15:0

  1. Yes (116 votes [66.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 66.67%

  2. No (58 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

Vote Hide poll

Procjon #1 Posted 18 July 2017 - 10:42 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 54248 battles
  • 459
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011

Is it me or the game gets more and more fast games that end in murdering the whole enemy team in less than 2-3 min?

 

I understand this game is a random but few years back i remember lots of really nice long matches being won by a hair. Now most of my matches are short and "rape" style which really lose the real fun. Some people might be happy when they are winning fast but i'm disappointed either i'm on the loosing or winning team when the game ends so rapidly.

 

Does anybody see similar pattern to this evolution of fast matches?



JuliusCheddar #2 Posted 18 July 2017 - 10:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28128 battles
  • 564
  • [NSORY] NSORY
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014
It's an obvious consequence of bad players rushing trough tiers. It can't be avoided without financial loss for WG

Edited by JuliusCheddar, 18 July 2017 - 10:49 PM.


qpranger #3 Posted 18 July 2017 - 11:10 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 31551 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostJuliusCheddar, on 18 July 2017 - 11:49 PM, said:

It's an obvious consequence of bad players rushing trough tiers...

 

...and being unequally distributed between the two teams.



WindSplitter1 #4 Posted 18 July 2017 - 11:12 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 15544 battles
  • 2,279
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostJuliusCheddar, on 18 July 2017 - 09:49 PM, said:

It's an obvious consequence of bad players rushing trough tiers. It can't be avoided without financial loss for WG

 

While I can't deny that, I wonder how come no one complains about stat-padding/seal-clubbing unicorns in their M2 Light or T1 Cunni

ZlatanArKung #5 Posted 18 July 2017 - 11:12 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
I don't mind fast battles.
I don't mind decisive wins either.

What I do dislike though, is drawn out campfests.

qpranger #6 Posted 18 July 2017 - 11:20 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 31551 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostZlatanArKung, on 19 July 2017 - 12:12 AM, said:

What I do dislike though, is drawn out campfests.

 

What I prefer to call "balanced and mentally stimulating gameplay".

Procjon #7 Posted 18 July 2017 - 11:35 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 54248 battles
  • 459
  • Member since:
    09-08-2011
i should also create another topic about wot losing streaks...so far 11 lost games and 1 win and counting...

ZlatanArKung #8 Posted 18 July 2017 - 11:47 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View Postqpranger, on 18 July 2017 - 11:20 PM, said:

 

What I prefer to call "balanced and mentally stimulating gameplay".

I don't get how it is "mentally stimulating" to sit in a bush for the first 5-10 minutes...

 



stormermp #9 Posted 18 July 2017 - 11:59 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 40950 battles
  • 82
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    03-12-2014
Relax guys WG's days are done for,few more years if that by my best guess.The game reached its stalemate and they are dropping players every month continously,gameplay lost all its skill based aspects weakspots,positioning,etc... now it's only about gold spamming at high tiers and which prem tanks is OP by most,they can't even handle the simplest of things like maps we have to wait years to get any and we get Paris.WG is a Joke

1ncompetenc3 #10 Posted 19 July 2017 - 12:18 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 36897 battles
  • 11,490
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

View PostZlatanArKung, on 18 July 2017 - 11:47 PM, said:

I don't get how it is "mentally stimulating" to sit in a bush for the first 5-10 minutes...

 

 

That depends entirely on what goes on within the bush. :harp:

Nexuo #11 Posted 19 July 2017 - 12:33 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19153 battles
  • 240
  • [DPG2] DPG2
  • Member since:
    09-19-2013
Without ever applying any sort of skill (or experience) based MM. We'll continue to see these uneven balanced team match ups.

stormermp #12 Posted 19 July 2017 - 12:38 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 40950 battles
  • 82
  • [S4LT] S4LT
  • Member since:
    03-12-2014

View PostNexuo, on 18 July 2017 - 11:33 PM, said:

Without ever applying any sort of skill (or experience) based MM. We'll continue to see these uneven balanced team match ups.

 

I mean it's so phun to lose 4-5 battles at tier X just ''randomly'',well this is what everyone needs to experience after work or just a few battles to relax.Look how many players does not return to wot or has sold accounts,the constant rofl stomps by ''weak'' mediums,same [edited]boring maps and coriddor based gold shootouts everything in life has it limits if tolerance

Nexuo #13 Posted 19 July 2017 - 12:52 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 19153 battles
  • 240
  • [DPG2] DPG2
  • Member since:
    09-19-2013

View Poststormermp, on 19 July 2017 - 12:38 AM, said:

 

I mean it's so phun to lose 4-5 battles at tier X just ''randomly'',well this is what everyone needs to experience after work or just a few battles to relax.Look how many players does not return to wot or has sold accounts,the constant rofl stomps by ''weak'' mediums,same [edited]boring maps and coriddor based gold shootouts everything in life has it limits if tolerance

 

For the love of what you hold dear. DO NOT PLAY AT DAY TIME. It's even worst... 

Argedeava #14 Posted 19 July 2017 - 06:54 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28912 battles
  • 512
  • [WODR] WODR
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View PostProcjon, on 18 July 2017 - 11:35 PM, said:

i should also create another topic about wot losing streaks...so far 11 lost games and 1 win and counting...

 

1) 10+ loosing streaks are not that rare.

2) With a overall 45% win rate the streak above should be statistically very, very rare.

3) XVM users can predict with 90%+ accuracy the result of a battle

Conclusion: MM is not balanced.

Suspicion: WG lies about MM.



ZlatanArKung #15 Posted 19 July 2017 - 07:05 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostArgedeava, on 19 July 2017 - 06:54 AM, said:

 

1) 10+ loosing streaks are not that rare.

2) With a overall 45% win rate the streak above should be statistically very, very rare.

3) XVM users can predict with 90%+ accuracy the result of a battle

Conclusion: MM is not balanced.

Suspicion: WG lies about MM.

 

WG doesn't lie about MM. Because they have never claimed it would be balanced skill wise. Only more balanced tank wise.



Tr0gledyte #16 Posted 19 July 2017 - 07:14 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 18596 battles
  • 1,406
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011
It is rather demotivating to see 14 red players on your team and 5+ greens or purples on the enemy's sometimes.

Argedeava #17 Posted 19 July 2017 - 07:29 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28912 battles
  • 512
  • [WODR] WODR
  • Member since:
    10-02-2013

View PostZlatanArKung, on 19 July 2017 - 07:05 AM, said:

 

WG doesn't lie about MM. Because they have never claimed it would be balanced skill wise. Only more balanced tank wise.

 

Which is a lie in itself.

Zodiac1960s #18 Posted 19 July 2017 - 07:32 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 37370 battles
  • 938
  • [VOMIT] VOMIT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011
I really like fast battles with a ton of slaughter. Fast xp and credits.
Guess thats why I love playing Heavyums like the WZ-111 1-4 and T-10.

Only 20k xp needed for the 5A. Cannot wait! :izmena:

ZlatanArKung #19 Posted 19 July 2017 - 07:36 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View PostArgedeava, on 19 July 2017 - 07:29 AM, said:

 

Which is a lie in itself.

Is it a lie to not say something?

 

Or are you of the 'MM is rigged' opin ion. 



Homer_J #20 Posted 19 July 2017 - 07:38 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27652 battles
  • 29,000
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostProcjon, on 18 July 2017 - 10:42 PM, said:

 

I understand this game is a random but few years back i remember lots of really nice long matches being won by a hair. 

 

I think that's called selective memory.

 

I always remember 15:0 battles being pretty common.

 

Here's a screenshot from way back.  You can tell how "rare" it this kind of result was because I named it 15-0-yet-again

 

Posted Image






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users