Jump to content


What is non-constructive about ...


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

qpranger #1 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:16 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33686 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

... a request to introduce statistics for the usage of premium shells? 

This place is beginning to feel like a cheap ripoff of a Kafka novel.

Pathetic and beyond.



Enforcer1975 #2 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:17 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20894 battles
  • 10,913
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014
Well it depends on how you introduce it...not like in the other thread. Also opening another thread and trying to discuss it is kind of non contructive too.

Edited by Enforcer1975, 21 July 2017 - 10:18 AM.


qpranger #3 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:20 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33686 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
Maybe I am naive, still expecting a dialogue between ordinary players and the powers than be, instead of them just sweeping awkward stuff under the carpet. No fun anymore, no faith in WG left.

Edited by qpranger, 21 July 2017 - 10:21 AM.


Unkel_Dolan #4 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:23 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 28196 battles
  • 2,695
  • [NOPAN] NOPAN
  • Member since:
    12-14-2010

premium shells are a more or less direct part of WG's income so it's "non-constructive" to criticize them, as in it won't construct them that gold plated yacht

that and terrible moderation associated with purposefully vague "rules" that can say anything you want them to



Enforcer1975 #5 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:24 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20894 battles
  • 10,913
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

It's not a dialogue if you open a thread like:

Block Quote

I wish WG would introduce a feature so i can see how many rtards and effing stetpedderers are spamming gold ammo to increase their duck size....

 

 

Block Quote

I wish WG would introduce a feature so i can see who gets better stats by using premium ammo and how much premium ammo is used against heavily armored tanks so we can see how bad their influence is on the game.

 


 

Which one would you censor and which one not? It all depends how you open a thread you know.



qpranger #6 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:26 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33686 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

Censor the naughty words by all means,

don't censor the whole underlying issue.



Enforcer1975 #7 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:29 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20894 battles
  • 10,913
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View Postqpranger, on 21 July 2017 - 10:26 AM, said:

Censor the naughty words by all means,

don't censor the whole underlying issue.

 

OP can still open another more constructive thread. Nobody is stopping him from doing that but nope...let's open a thread and rant like a kid then blame the mods for closing a thread that is aimed to raise toxicity.

qpranger #8 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:32 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33686 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
Toxicity in this context is raised by Wargaming's refusal to curtail usage of premium ammunition. A reasonable limit should be introduced, for instance 20% of total ammo count. This would make the game much healthier overnight. 

anonym_kL7qtn3e52MB #9 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:34 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 6,815
  • Member since:
    07-10-2018

It's not contructive for those who spam premiumshells.

It would put the stats of some people (quite a few...) in a different light.

 

 

Already suggested by the way, to have WN8 ratings adjusted with premspam in mind (less WN8 for firing prem shells)

WN8 team doesn't want to though.



imendars #10 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:40 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10983 battles
  • 1,086
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014
You know admins dont smoke/eat dinner forever, right? :trollface:

ApocalypseSquad #11 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:41 AM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 26624 battles
  • 2,055
  • Member since:
    07-31-2011
I'd be interested to see the aggregated stats in vbaddict.  In which tanks do people feel compelled to use a lot of premium ammo?

JuliusCheddar #12 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:42 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31182 battles
  • 564
  • [3BPAN] 3BPAN
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014
Wouldn't it be rigged qp? 

qpranger #13 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:47 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33686 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostJuliusCheddar, on 21 July 2017 - 11:42 AM, said:

Wouldn't it be rigged qp? 

 

How?

Slyspy #14 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:52 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14205 battles
  • 16,752
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View Postqpranger, on 21 July 2017 - 10:20 AM, said:

Maybe I am naive, still expecting a dialogue between ordinary players and the powers than be, instead of them just sweeping awkward stuff under the carpet. No fun anymore, no faith in WG left.

 

You aren't naive, you are just a wind-up merchant. 

a_noob_in_his_ #15 Posted 21 July 2017 - 10:56 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 47450 battles
  • 310
  • Member since:
    09-29-2013

premium use

it's for the people who desperately need to feel "competitive"

(a disgusting phrase, propagated by some unicumbuckets, designed to fool people into thinking the game is important in some way, to justify the money they spend)

 

"oh, no! i bounced a shot! better dab the 2 key instead of thinking."

 

but, then again, that only works if the game's accuracy wasn't effed

then you could shoot at weak spots (if you know where they are)

 

i'd like my shots to go where i aim them.

and that doesn't happen with alarming regularity, even when stationary and fully aimed.

 

this is also why the idea of this being an E-sport is laughable

 

peace



VMX #16 Posted 21 July 2017 - 11:04 AM

    Corporal

  • Guest
  • 8509 battles
  • 138
  • Member since:
    08-17-2011

Hello,

 

This topic is moved to Off-topic section.

 

Opening post of a topic is quite important when it comes to setting the tone of the whole thread,so please refrain from forum rule violations especially when you are starting a new thread.

 

Thank you,

VMX



Unkel_Dolan #17 Posted 21 July 2017 - 11:11 AM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 28196 battles
  • 2,695
  • [NOPAN] NOPAN
  • Member since:
    12-14-2010
called it

250swb #18 Posted 21 July 2017 - 11:12 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 23141 battles
  • 5,250
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015

View Postqpranger, on 21 July 2017 - 10:32 AM, said:

Toxicity in this context is raised by Wargaming's refusal to curtail usage of premium ammunition. A reasonable limit should be introduced, for instance 20% of total ammo count. This would make the game much healthier overnight.

 

And that would nerf a good percentage of tanks who find themselves low tier and either not fully upgraded or with small guns. If you want to do that let's make suiciding at the start of a game a legitimate option because you'll kill off any chance most of the player base has of contributing to a battle if MM is against them.

Edited by 250swb, 21 July 2017 - 11:14 AM.


Gkirmathal #19 Posted 21 July 2017 - 11:13 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 8125 battles
  • 1,520
  • Member since:
    01-14-2013

View PostVMX, on 21 July 2017 - 10:04 AM, said:

Hello,

 

This topic is moved to Off-topic section.

 

Opening post of a topic is quite important when it comes to setting the tone of the whole thread,so please refrain from forum rule violations especially when you are starting a new thread.

 

Thank you,

VMX

 

With all due respect, you could have requested QP to rewrite the post title and his op post, instead of moving this VALID topic to the bin VMX.

 

This move action now just come across as a bit censures. With all due respect.

 



imendars #20 Posted 21 July 2017 - 11:29 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10983 battles
  • 1,086
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

View PostGkirmathal, on 21 July 2017 - 01:13 PM, said:

 

With all due respect, you could have requested QP to rewrite the post title and his op post, instead of moving this VALID topic to the bin VMX.

 

This move action now just come across as a bit censures. With all due respect.

 

 

Thats why being admin is so cool. You CAN do the right thing. But you dont have to... :trollface:
 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users