Jump to content


T67?


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

Thejagdpanther #1 Posted 22 July 2017 - 08:46 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33024 battles
  • 4,238
  • [TKBS] TKBS
  • Member since:
    07-16-2012

It's possibile to nerf the crap out of that tank? Wg stile?

 

On a serious note... can be done something about that tank?

It more easy to write to only drawback than the all others too much positive things.



PowJay #2 Posted 22 July 2017 - 08:52 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 33774 battles
  • 3,949
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

Yeah, nerf it and I can watch my 47% WR drop even further.

 

Seriously, this is the third time I have owned it. I had negative WR, back up to 50%+WR (and sold it) and bought it back to watch my WR plummet. I have just lost my first battle of the day with a team which should have walked it!

 

And my second battle. Bottom tier.

And my third battle. Bottom tier.

 

Won the fourth battle 46.74% WR. SOOOOOO OP.

 

 

 

My stats in it up to this week (not today) 1.5x my own HP in damage average, and decent Wn8. It's not like I am doing NOTHING!


Edited by PowJay, 22 July 2017 - 09:09 AM.


250swb #3 Posted 22 July 2017 - 08:56 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 20777 battles
  • 4,577
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
The T67 was nerfed a while ago, and to be honest a lot of players look at it through rose tinted specs thinking of when it was truly OP. It's possible to have some great games in the T67, but it isn't a great tank anymore and definitely doesn't need nerfing.

Baldrickk #4 Posted 22 July 2017 - 09:12 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29023 battles
  • 12,845
  • [-TAH-] -TAH-
  • Member since:
    03-03-2013

Only because I already had the site open, working on other things:

nope, not overperfoming at all.

 

With that said though, more tanks overperform than underperform.  Probably because players do better in recents than their globals.



BravelyRanAway #5 Posted 22 July 2017 - 09:21 AM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22194 battles
  • 8,091
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostThejagdpanther, on 22 July 2017 - 07:46 AM, said:

It's possibile to nerf the crap out of that tank? Wg stile?

I think WG should only nerf German tanks. :trollface:

 

(PS:- gotta admire your dedication to the German line)



JuliusCheddar #6 Posted 22 July 2017 - 09:30 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27971 battles
  • 564
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014
And then, all of sudden, a thread about t67 being underpowered 

Nickthedevil #7 Posted 22 July 2017 - 09:39 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21987 battles
  • 291
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-20-2014

You leave my T67 alone  :angry:

 

How about they nerf the hell out of boring German TD's which seem to be the ONLY thing you've ever played.

 



JuliusCheddar #8 Posted 22 July 2017 - 10:10 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27971 battles
  • 564
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014
Didn't WG themselves say it's broken as balls and has no place in game in current state? 

Enforcer1975 #9 Posted 22 July 2017 - 10:21 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 18361 battles
  • 9,842
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View PostJuliusCheddar, on 22 July 2017 - 10:10 AM, said:

Didn't WG themselves say it's broken as balls and has no place in game in current state? 

Yep...their recent addition's to the game that is...in the current map situation you have to work your butt off to perform well on the T67 as an average scrub like me. You need a good crew and put the right equipment on it to increase it's capabilities and yet every comparable LT can eat it for breakfast since it has all traits the T67 has and more. 


Edited by Enforcer1975, 22 July 2017 - 10:22 AM.


FluffyRedFox #10 Posted 22 July 2017 - 10:25 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21564 battles
  • 7,691
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012
I certainly hope this thing gets the nerf hammer soon, so bloody annoying having tier 5 ruined by the things.

Enforcer1975 #11 Posted 22 July 2017 - 10:34 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 18361 battles
  • 9,842
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View PostBaldrickk, on 22 July 2017 - 09:12 AM, said:

Only because I already had the site open, working on other things:

 

nope, not overperfoming at all.

 

With that said though, more tanks overperform than underperform.  Probably because players do better in recents than their globals.

I bought it just recently so i can't say how OP it was back then but it's only natural for a player with more experience to perform better....except the "i play 4 fun 30k tomatoes" ofc. 

f.e. i was so bad with the Luchs because i had no clue how to play it. Then we played together and i learned by watching. Many stats are distorted anyway if you count all the players and rerolls exclusively using certain tanks for padding and how many players have a lot of good experience and play well grinding the new lines. 


Edited by Enforcer1975, 22 July 2017 - 10:36 AM.


Joggaman #12 Posted 22 July 2017 - 10:42 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22518 battles
  • 5,821
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011
It's not as good as it should used to be. Pls buff! And while you're at it, bring back the old SU-26 as well!!

Baldrickk #13 Posted 22 July 2017 - 10:43 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29023 battles
  • 12,845
  • [-TAH-] -TAH-
  • Member since:
    03-03-2013
The problem with the T67 is characterised by one battle I had, in the pre-nerf Chaffee.
Chaffee has 390m view range.
Mine has Optics, vents, Sit.Awareness and BIA, giving 443m view range.
Couldn't spot a T67 in a bush (that I knew was there), at 55m

Joggaman #14 Posted 22 July 2017 - 10:48 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22518 battles
  • 5,821
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-23-2011

View PostBaldrickk, on 22 July 2017 - 11:43 AM, said:

The problem with the T67 is characterised by one battle I had, in the pre-nerf Chaffee.
Chaffee has 390m view range.
Mine has Optics, vents, Sit.Awareness and BIA, giving 443m view range.
Couldn't spot a T67 in a bush (that I knew was there), at 55m

 

Could have been me and my 5-skilled crew under a cammonet... But then again, I manage to also hide my KV-1 pretty well, but no one complain about that. 



Sirebellus #15 Posted 22 July 2017 - 10:57 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 17432 battles
  • 388
  • Member since:
    02-04-2016
I quite often nerf them with a oneshot round from my leFH105... They're my favourite target :trollface:

leggasiini #16 Posted 22 July 2017 - 01:19 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 9584 battles
  • 5,804
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

Its broken tank that could get quite easily raped into useless if nerfed. However, it clearly has negative impact to tier 5 games; it alone is a reason that makes them less fun.

 

Nerf view range IMO, so it cant spot too well for itself. Maybe nerf the reverse speed a bit; IE Hellcat treatment.



FluffyRedFox #17 Posted 22 July 2017 - 01:23 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21564 battles
  • 7,691
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

View Postleggasiini, on 22 July 2017 - 12:19 PM, said:

 

 

Nerf view range IMO, so it cant spot too well for itself. Maybe nerf the reverse speed a bit; IE Hellcat treatment.

and  nerf the reload, 2.5k dpm with just a rammer is beyond ridiculous for a tier 5


Edited by fishbob101, 22 July 2017 - 01:23 PM.


arthurwellsley #18 Posted 22 July 2017 - 01:27 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 50480 battles
  • 2,506
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    05-11-2011
I three marked the Pz.Kpfw IV Ausf.H using the short 105mm, and 410 damage HE rolls into T67s were a real bonus in getting the third moe.

Enforcer1975 #19 Posted 22 July 2017 - 01:37 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 18361 battles
  • 9,842
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View Postarthurwellsley, on 22 July 2017 - 01:27 PM, said:

I three marked the Pz.Kpfw IV Ausf.H using the short 105mm, and 410 damage HE rolls into T67s were a real bonus in getting the third moe.

 

Not going to talk down your achievement here but they should have considered the gun being used to calculate MOEs since you have it way easier with a derp in mid tiers than with a regular anti tank gun imo if you consider how many one shot paper targets are present.

Edited by Enforcer1975, 22 July 2017 - 01:38 PM.


HaZardeur #20 Posted 22 July 2017 - 01:41 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 33257 battles
  • 1,058
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010
I outstatped them T67 jockeys in my M4 derp... they usually send me angry messages after the match... leave them as they are.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users