Jump to content


What premium tanks do you think needs buffed!


  • Please log in to reply
38 replies to this topic

ScottishJunky #1 Posted 25 July 2017 - 08:27 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3997 battles
  • 361
  • [D_G_M] D_G_M
  • Member since:
    07-21-2016

Welcome!

 

Feel free to share your thoughts on what tanks should be nerfed down below!

Heres my list:

 

Buffed:

 

  • AMC CDC - Soft gun stats, maybe make it a bit smaller (If that's possible?!?)
  • Krupp Steyr - Speed, should be much faster and maybe give it a little more alpha
  • FV 4202 - They gave it an armor buff when it needs better gun stats
  • KV-4 Kres - Give it a better gun and slightly more speed.
  • T-34-3 - Better aim time
  • FV201 - Basically everything ;)
  • FCM - Personaly think it should get less armor but get Premium MM again

 

This is just my list, leave yours down below and if you think something on my list shouldn't change or be nerfed then make sure to tell me, Cheers!

 

 


Edited by ScottishJunky, 25 July 2017 - 08:27 PM.


wsatnutter #2 Posted 25 July 2017 - 08:33 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 24959 battles
  • 7,592
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
please someone say type 59 oh go on pretty please

tankqull #3 Posted 25 July 2017 - 08:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20928 battles
  • 1,499
  • [-FD-] -FD-
  • Member since:
    08-31-2011
american t34 -either mobility or thicker turret roof armor to not being overmatched by cromwell guns...

tankqull #4 Posted 25 July 2017 - 08:36 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 20928 battles
  • 1,499
  • [-FD-] -FD-
  • Member since:
    08-31-2011

View Postwsatnutter, on 25 July 2017 - 07:33 PM, said:

please someone say type 59 oh go on pretty please

 

well would love to see its release mobility reinstalled...

Garrolus #5 Posted 25 July 2017 - 08:36 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 28432 battles
  • 281
  • Member since:
    08-10-2011
Type 59 for sure

wsatnutter #6 Posted 25 July 2017 - 08:38 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 24959 battles
  • 7,592
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
Yea 

ScottishJunky #7 Posted 25 July 2017 - 09:00 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3997 battles
  • 361
  • [D_G_M] D_G_M
  • Member since:
    07-21-2016

View Posttankqull, on 25 July 2017 - 08:34 PM, said:

american t34 -either mobility or thicker turret roof armor to not being overmatched by cromwell guns...

 

I think the T-34 is just fine, pretty outdated and can still get trumped on but if played in hull down play styles it can be effective. 



ScottishJunky #8 Posted 25 July 2017 - 09:02 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3997 battles
  • 361
  • [D_G_M] D_G_M
  • Member since:
    07-21-2016

View PostGarrolus, on 25 July 2017 - 08:36 PM, said:

Type 59 for sure

 

 

I agree, it's a shame instead of buffing older tanks they just make blantantly op premium tanks and when they eventually do decide to buff older tanks they don't listen to there players and buff the turret armor.



Matcorr #9 Posted 25 July 2017 - 09:27 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22746 battles
  • 764
  • Member since:
    04-24-2013

View PostScottishJunky, on 25 July 2017 - 08:00 PM, said:

 

I think the T-34 is just fine, pretty outdated and can still get trumped on but if played in hull down play styles it can be effective. 

 

I like my T34 sometimes but there are games where the gun just won't behave, fully aimed shots missing tanks completely.

Zoltan1251 #10 Posted 25 July 2017 - 09:35 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11079 battles
  • 538
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
T-34-3 only needs 190 pen and its good to go.... aiming will still be horrible but that will be its main drawback with other stats mediocre...  it was always for the longest time, the holy triangle of balance PENETRATION, DPM, AIMING (alternatively alpha)..... you always had only two of those but never all three... with T-34-3 you dont have anything but pref MM, so a bit more pen and its normal tank

ScottishJunky #11 Posted 25 July 2017 - 09:46 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3997 battles
  • 361
  • [D_G_M] D_G_M
  • Member since:
    07-21-2016

View PostZoltan1251, on 25 July 2017 - 09:35 PM, said:

T-34-3 only needs 190 pen and its good to go.... aiming will still be horrible but that will be its main drawback with other stats mediocre...  it was always for the longest time, the holy triangle of balance PENETRATION, DPM, AIMING (alternatively alpha)..... you always had only two of those but never all three... with T-34-3 you dont have anything but pref MM, so a bit more pen and its normal tank

 

Fair enough, but it feel that most shots with the T-34-3 are 50% which I don't really like.

TheOneTrickPony #12 Posted 25 July 2017 - 09:47 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14302 battles
  • 9
  • Member since:
    06-14-2013

American scorpion: a slight increase in turret rotation

T14: Increase in accuracy/pennetration or slightly better hull armor

And quite a bit more i can't remember at this moment 



Zoltan1251 #13 Posted 25 July 2017 - 09:54 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11079 battles
  • 538
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013

View PostScottishJunky, on 25 July 2017 - 09:46 PM, said:

 

Fair enough, but it feel that most shots with the T-34-3 are 50% which I don't really like.

 

well then its not tank for you... like for example everyone hates STB for bad accuracy but i think the accuracy is awesome, while Patriot cant hit barn.... it is perfectly unique in the game.... its medium with big alpha, making it interesting to play... i for example dont like Patriot mostly as it not really fit my playstyle and what is more annoying is that we have tons of premiums with low alpha and good aim time..... making another one wont add anything

ScottishJunky #14 Posted 25 July 2017 - 09:57 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3997 battles
  • 361
  • [D_G_M] D_G_M
  • Member since:
    07-21-2016

View PostZoltan1251, on 25 July 2017 - 09:54 PM, said:

 

well then its not tank for you... like for example everyone hates STB for bad accuracy but i think the accuracy is awesome, while Patriot cant hit barn.... it is perfectly unique in the game.... its medium with big alpha, making it interesting to play... i for example dont like Patriot mostly as it not really fit my playstyle and what is more annoying is that we have tons of premiums with low alpha and good aim time..... making another one wont add anything

 

I actually enjoy the tank quite a lot, but with most shots I seem to miss and it hits the turret or something and that's where the pen buff could poetionally come into play.



Zoltan1251 #15 Posted 25 July 2017 - 10:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11079 battles
  • 538
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013

View PostScottishJunky, on 25 July 2017 - 09:57 PM, said:

 

I actually enjoy the tank quite a lot, but with most shots I seem to miss and it hits the turret or something and that's where the pen buff could poetionally come into play.

 

exactly.... now its unbearable to play... but that few more penetrations in the game can make all the difference in how you feel about the tank.... it will still miss a lot but you have a CHANCE at penetrating.... thats what old balancing was all about, small weakspots and anyone could pen them, problem was if you had great aim you didnt have dpm or alpha, and if you had alpha you couldnt hit it easily...... wonder what was wrong with that, according to new balancing morons!!!!

Matcorr #16 Posted 25 July 2017 - 10:02 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22746 battles
  • 764
  • Member since:
    04-24-2013

View PostZoltan1251, on 25 July 2017 - 08:54 PM, said:

 its medium with big alpha, making it interesting to play

 

121 buddy

Element6 #17 Posted 25 July 2017 - 10:05 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29305 battles
  • 10,394
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    01-06-2013

The Steyr is actually quite fast now, when it was released it was a true lawn mower.

 

The Swedish Strv m/42-57 could make use of a little more engine health...



ScottishJunky #18 Posted 25 July 2017 - 10:10 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 3997 battles
  • 361
  • [D_G_M] D_G_M
  • Member since:
    07-21-2016

View PostElement6_TheSprout, on 25 July 2017 - 10:05 PM, said:

The Steyr is actually quite fast now, when it was released it was a true lawn mower.

 

The Swedish Strv m/42-57 could make use of a little more engine health...

 

I don't know, I recently played my Steyr and it still feels pretty slow..

FluffyRedFox #19 Posted 25 July 2017 - 10:19 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 22971 battles
  • 8,394
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012

Matilda IV - Needs a penetration increase. 102  apcr, its barely got its use in tier 5 let alone in tier 6 against crap like the OI... What am I gonna do? Flank it?.

Strv 42/57 - Needs more engine health and a clip reload/ intra clip reload. As of now, it has 1,700 dpm with vents and BIA which is a bit crap considering that there are a few mediums at the tier that get close to a thousand more dpm.

 

 



8126Jakobsson #20 Posted 25 July 2017 - 10:30 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 66553 battles
  • 3,346
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
I have a bunch of premiums and I think they are mostly just fine to good. The one thing that pops up in my mind seeing this topic though is FCM gun handling. A small tweak would be welcomed by me, be it a hard stat like aim time or soft like bloom. Make it just a bit more snappy and accurate, you know.   




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users