Jump to content


If you read it


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
8 replies to this topic

ZlatanArKung #1 Posted 26 July 2017 - 08:48 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

You should have been able to understand it was about how new MM is influencing the WR spread of WGs players compared to old MM.

Not about how MM works or wether it is good or bad.

 

If you think posts miss the target of the thread, you should remove those posts instead of closing an entire thread which could turn out to be interesting (which I believe it is).

 

Also, every thread on the forum has a bunch of useless/non-constructive posts in them. In some threads, a majority is useless non-constructive posts. Yet those threads survive.


Edited by ZlatanArKung, 26 July 2017 - 08:50 AM.


ZlatanArKung #2 Posted 26 July 2017 - 08:52 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Just check this thread, which is a whine thread about how MM screws him/some players over
http://forum.worldof...0#entry14583262

ZlatanArKung #3 Posted 26 July 2017 - 08:54 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
And here you have another MM thread.
http://forum.worldof...3#entry14584853

ThebaldEagle #4 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:09 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 756 battles
  • 373
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014

But it was still about MM

 

but since yhou pretend that you did not make a mm discussiontread try to have a look at that pinned mm tread and read it again and think about what it means.

 

Block Quote

 Any other threads created about the matchmaker will be merged with this one to prevent matchmaking threads from dominating the gameplay forum.

 So maby thats why your treads get closed.

 



ortega456 #5 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:11 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 59545 battles
  • 999
  • Member since:
    06-08-2012
"If you read it" - Very related title. Stop that fkn [edited]clickbaiting...

Ze_HOFF_fverhoef #6 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:15 AM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 15134 battles
  • 3,134
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    03-18-2012

I thought it was some kind of prank..

like "if you read it"

followed with "You're completely nuts"

 

Which basically I am for having clicked on this post.



DracheimFlug #7 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:19 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 8956 battles
  • 4,040
  • Member since:
    11-13-2014

View PostZlatanArKung, on 26 July 2017 - 08:48 AM, said:

You should have been able to understand it was about how new MM is influencing the WR spread of WGs players compared to old MM.

Not about how MM works or wether it is good or bad.

 

If you think posts miss the target of the thread, you should remove those posts instead of closing an entire thread which could turn out to be interesting (which I believe it is).

 

Also, every thread on the forum has a bunch of useless/non-constructive posts in them. In some threads, a majority is useless non-constructive posts. Yet those threads survive.

 

So you are saying that your thread wasn't about MM because it was differently about MM..... and rather than just accept you might have been wrong about that meaning it isn't about MM, you have started another thread complaining about moderation? How well did that work the time you tried it?

imendars #8 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:25 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10946 battles
  • 1,073
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

View PostZlatanArKung, on 26 July 2017 - 10:48 AM, said:

You should have been able to understand it was about how new MM is influencing the WR spread of WGs players compared to old MM.

Not about how MM works or wether it is good or bad.

 

If you think posts miss the target of the thread, you should remove those posts instead of closing an entire thread which could turn out to be interesting (which I believe it is).

 

Also, every thread on the forum has a bunch of useless/non-constructive posts in them. In some threads, a majority is useless non-constructive posts. Yet those threads survive.

 

I predict future - your thread gona get closed.

And i'm wondering at what point admin is gona run out of coffee if you got what i mean... :trollface:   :popcorn:   :bajan:



Nohe21 #9 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:29 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 906 battles
  • 303
  • [WG_M] WG_M
  • Member since:
    05-23-2017

*Thread closed due to non constructive. You have the main pinned thread here where you can post anything you want to add about the MM discussion:

 

http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/635504-matchmaking-discussion-thread/

 

Thank you.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users