Jump to content


T9 gain the most from "improved MM"


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
16 replies to this topic

I_DiD_ #1 Posted 26 July 2017 - 04:37 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 1462 battles
  • 588
  • [PGGY] PGGY
  • Member since:
    04-13-2014

After some grinding at T9's and missions for 260 im playing most of my games at T9. And what can i say, it's best tier at the moment.

 

3-5-7 is the prfect MM for this tier, so here goes my question. Why they don't increase T8 premiums to T9 tier? 

 

last 2 days im playing the M53 T9 arty, and never saw more then 3 TX per game. Im always top tier or middle of 3-5-7 system.

 

And question for arty missions, what is best tier for SPG12(260). Im asking, cus my highest tier is T9 M53, but like i wrote above , i don't see a lot T10's,.

 

So that would have chance for more assist damage and 200 second stun time.

 

The mission sound easy, but with so many need for speed tanks, and very fast games it's luck to get 200 second stun.


Edited by I_DiD_, 26 July 2017 - 08:35 PM.


Instigator #2 Posted 26 July 2017 - 05:02 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40428 battles
  • 353
  • [R-A-C] R-A-C
  • Member since:
    09-30-2011

If everyone decided the same (play tier 9) it would partly resolve the current MM issue and then they wouldn't have to do anything. In any case I quite like the new MM - even if that does make me a bit odd.

 

I just bought French tier 9 arty because I have 4 or 5 missions for the Obj 260 to do (rest I used M44). It isn't working out well for me so far mostly because I dont seem to get many tier X in it (unlike most other tanks I play). Interested in seeing feedback on that question myself.



JuliusCheddar #3 Posted 26 July 2017 - 05:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29478 battles
  • 564
  • [3BPAN] 3BPAN
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014

Clickers get better MM than normal tanks. 

But yeah, tier 9 gets fantastic matchmaking. 

And that's exactly why we won't introduce tier 9 premium tanks.

Also, because of Schrader in his premium e75



I_DiD_ #4 Posted 26 July 2017 - 08:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 1462 battles
  • 588
  • [PGGY] PGGY
  • Member since:
    04-13-2014

View PostInstigator, on 26 July 2017 - 04:02 PM, said:

If everyone decided the same (play tier 9) it would partly resolve the current MM issue and then they wouldn't have to do anything. In any case I quite like the new MM - even if that does make me a bit odd.

 

I just bought French tier 9 arty because I have 4 or 5 missions for the Obj 260 to do (rest I used M44). It isn't working out well for me so far mostly because I dont seem to get many tier X in it (unlike most other tanks I play). Interested in seeing feedback on that question myself.

 

Thats the same problem what i have. I just can't get enough meat to have those 200 seconds.

 

Idk arty should have high number of high games then normal tanks, cus they are way to easy to play even with 4+mm.

 

I though to rebuy 261 for the SPG12 mission?  I play the M53 with first gun to get as much shoots possible, to have those 200seconds,but man, the games are faster over then those 200 seconds for stun.



BabyR4ge #5 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:02 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 28423 battles
  • 44
  • [GSQT] GSQT
  • Member since:
    10-05-2010

Tier 9 was always the best ...

 



Sfinski #6 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:16 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 31689 battles
  • 2,608
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View PostFesterman, on 26 July 2017 - 09:02 PM, said:

Tier 9 was always the best ...

 

Now it's just pretty much the only playable. 

BabyR4ge #7 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:17 PM

    Private

  • Beta Tester
  • 28423 battles
  • 44
  • [GSQT] GSQT
  • Member since:
    10-05-2010

Yep .. sad but very accurate mate

 



SlenderMoose #8 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:22 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 57358 battles
  • 372
  • [-FRI-] -FRI-
  • Member since:
    05-04-2011

View PostSfinski, on 26 July 2017 - 09:16 PM, said:

 

Now it's just pretty much the only playable. 

 

Amen brother!

Vanezza #9 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:36 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38450 battles
  • 360
  • Member since:
    03-06-2012

And what were you hoping for? WOT is the most manipulated game in the world.

They manipulate the tank with skill and RNG, teams, players, premium ammo. One team get 10% RNG, other team get 50% RNG.  This game is garbage, just money maker game.

Play it just like that - just pastime. 3 years and this game is gone.



BravelyRanAway #10 Posted 26 July 2017 - 09:46 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22539 battles
  • 9,317
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostVanezza, on 26 July 2017 - 08:36 PM, said:

3 years and this game is gone.

Folks have been saying that for the last six years.



Vanezza #11 Posted 26 July 2017 - 10:57 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38450 battles
  • 360
  • Member since:
    03-06-2012

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 26 July 2017 - 09:46 PM, said:

Folks have been saying that for the last six years.

 

There are a lot of idiots who feed the hydra

No matter what you do, it's nonsense

 

They change everything they want.....


Edited by Vanezza, 26 July 2017 - 10:58 PM.


teamkill_2014 #12 Posted 26 July 2017 - 11:56 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 16421 battles
  • 758
  • Member since:
    12-24-2014

1357gf gains the most from new matchmaking it is the new ELC now - which i used to happily fail platoon into tier X battles with :D

 



Homer_J #13 Posted 27 July 2017 - 01:00 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28692 battles
  • 29,991
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

Wrong.

 

Tier III gained the most as it no longer meets tier V.



Fandral #14 Posted 27 July 2017 - 02:18 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 56733 battles
  • 94
  • [QSF] QSF
  • Member since:
    02-28-2013
I agree everything below tier 9 is in a sad state now, but what is wrong with tier 10? Seems fine to me.

Homer_J #15 Posted 27 July 2017 - 02:23 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28692 battles
  • 29,991
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostFandral, on 27 July 2017 - 02:18 AM, said:

 but what is wrong with tier 10? Seems fine to me.

 

Too many all tier X battles.



BKatt #16 Posted 27 July 2017 - 04:19 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 32863 battles
  • 464
  • [ORIGN] ORIGN
  • Member since:
    04-28-2013

View PostFandral, on 27 July 2017 - 01:18 AM, said:

I agree everything below tier 9 is in a sad state now, but what is wrong with tier 10? Seems fine to me.

 

Whats wrong with tier 10, is both teams consist of pure tier 10 tanks most of the time.

The guns are so powerful, plus there is just as many Rtards there as in lower tiers. The games becomes a 2 minute roflstomp for either side, for the most parts, due to thw snowball effect. If your team is down 4 tanks near the beginning, is almost decided.

 

In tier 9 and lower its easier to turn the tide.



Asklepi0s #17 Posted 27 July 2017 - 08:59 AM

    Moderator

  • Moderator
  • 6715 battles
  • 846
  • Member since:
    01-23-2017
Thread is closed.
Due to the high number of Match Making, we want discussions to take place in the main pinned thread here.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users