Jump to content


tier 10 gameplay


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

_Anarchistic_ #1 Posted 27 July 2017 - 02:24 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38466 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

just a curious thought about tier 10 at the moment

 

of all the tiers I am finding this the most frustrating due to almost all one sided battles.  works both ways, we roflstomp or vice versa.  This gets worse in all tier 10 games as one flank just dies in 2 minutes.

checking the game results and you will see the majority of players only do 1 or 2 shots damage at best.

 

so should the economy be made harder?  much costlier to play if you do bad but more rewarding if you do well?

 

I know at moment it is difficult to make good credits at tier 10, I can only be consistently in credit by using standard consumables, no large kits or consumables except AFE but if players are always losing money for bad play would that make them either play lower tiers until they get better or force them to actually play more intelligently?

 

just a thought

 

edit   that will probably get shot down :teethhappy:

 

 


Edited by Stewie2ie, 27 July 2017 - 02:25 AM.


Matcorr #2 Posted 27 July 2017 - 02:57 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 22746 battles
  • 764
  • Member since:
    04-24-2013
As a guy who hates grinding credits, nah

Jigabachi #3 Posted 27 July 2017 - 03:09 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17923 battles
  • 19,013
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

View PostStewie2ie, on 27 July 2017 - 02:24 AM, said:

 but if players are always losing money for bad play would that make them either play lower tiers until they get better or force them to actually play more intelligently?

Do you really think that changing the economy would fix bad play and general stoopid?

Bad players already lose quite a lot of money in the higher tiers...



sgtYester #4 Posted 27 July 2017 - 09:46 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 54377 battles
  • 1,652
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011

and another player that statspads thinking he is a good player and should get the privilige of not playing with new players...... 

http://www.noobmeter...e2ie/525456445/   

 

:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:



DuncaN_101 #5 Posted 27 July 2017 - 09:58 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53219 battles
  • 1,891
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View PostJigabachi, on 27 July 2017 - 03:09 AM, said:

Do you really think that changing the economy would fix bad play and general stoopid?

Bad players already lose quite a lot of money in the higher tiers...

 

This + what makes you think this only goes on in T10? 

 

It's the same in every frigging tier in the game these days and has been for quite some time now. 

You either get a half decent team or you get one that doesn't know left from right or if you're really unlucky you get a team that knows exactly what to do and you can't get too the fight quick enough. 

 

In all cases it's a matter of sith happens 



kripton69 #6 Posted 27 July 2017 - 10:06 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 1208 battles
  • 389
  • [-UM] -UM
  • Member since:
    06-23-2016

Tier 10 is just the retarded version of tier 9 nowadays. Most of the things are exactly the same except the tier 10 versions of the tanks are usually 10 times more broken. I mean you're always top tier as tier 10 but the difference isn't that big because tier 9 is never bottom tier anyway so I don't think it's worth the total rape of game balance.

 

If you have been brainwashed to think that extreme unbalance is a good thing because "it adds diversity" and can reason why tanks like Maus, Type 5 Heavy and a million different retarded autoloaders is good for the game it may be worth playing.


Edited by kripton69, 27 July 2017 - 10:20 AM.


Instigator #7 Posted 27 July 2017 - 10:11 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 40428 battles
  • 353
  • [R-A-C] R-A-C
  • Member since:
    09-30-2011

View PostsgtYester, on 27 July 2017 - 09:46 AM, said:

and another player that statspads thinking he is a good player and should get the privilige of not playing with new players...... 

http://www.noobmeter...e2ie/525456445/   

 

:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

 

Eh? You think a guy who has Cent AX as 2nd most played tank and can manage almost 2.8k dmg per battle in an FV215b is a stat padder? I think I need a definition because I am buggered if I can see it. before you quote him playing the E25 so much, seriously he is way better in most other tanks including every one of his tier X vehicles. Not even sure he is being elitist , though I don't like his suggestion.

Edited by Instigator, 27 July 2017 - 10:14 AM.


_Anarchistic_ #8 Posted 27 July 2017 - 12:27 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38466 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

View PostsgtYester, on 27 July 2017 - 09:46 AM, said:

and another player that statspads thinking he is a good player and should get the privilige of not playing with new players...... 

http://www.noobmeter...e2ie/525456445/   

 

:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

 

err?

 

look at my account from tier 1, a gradual improvement on every measurement

 

no reroll, not padding, every nation being played on every line, I did tier rush with English line to old fv and tanked bad, 42%wr , but in cent ax pushing it up gradually, same with other tier 10s, not great but all going up

 

also did I mention new players?  players in tier 8 premiums with 50 games?  nope 



_Anarchistic_ #9 Posted 27 July 2017 - 12:29 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38466 battles
  • 1,081
  • Member since:
    01-07-2015

View PostInstigator, on 27 July 2017 - 10:11 AM, said:

 

Eh? You think a guy who has Cent AX as 2nd most played tank and can manage almost 2.8k dmg per battle in an FV215b is a stat padder? I think I need a definition because I am buggered if I can see it. before you quote him playing the E25 so much, seriously he is way better in most other tanks including every one of his tier X vehicles. Not even sure he is being elitist , though I don't like his suggestion.

 

​can manage almost 2.8k in an fv215b?  

 

is that a complement or an insult lmao !!!

 

ignore e25, when I first played the game it was being removed from shop 'forever' because it was so 'OP' so I bought it before I ever had a clue what I was doing !!  err, that may not have changed much either :teethhappy:



STLR #10 Posted 27 July 2017 - 01:49 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 30827 battles
  • 736
  • [MIND] MIND
  • Member since:
    06-07-2013

View Postkripton69, on 27 July 2017 - 10:06 AM, said:

Tier 10 is just the retarded version of tier 9 nowadays. Most of the things are exactly the same except the tier 10 versions of the tanks are usually 10 times more broken. I mean you're always top tier as tier 10 but the difference isn't that big because tier 9 is never bottom tier anyway so I don't think it's worth the total rape of game balance.

 

If you have been brainwashed to think that extreme unbalance is a good thing because "it adds diversity" and can reason why tanks like Maus, Type 5 Heavy and a million different retarded autoloaders is good for the game it may be worth playing.

 

funny and sadly thing, is that you are right :) unless your playing the broken ones...




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users