Jump to content


Reintroduction of WT auf E100


  • Please log in to reply
77 replies to this topic

qpranger #1 Posted 28 July 2017 - 11:38 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 31524 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

So if I want to play it now I have to move to Chinese servers?

Europe suddenly not good enough? Not fair!!!

 

 

 

 



SuperDuperOtter #2 Posted 28 July 2017 - 11:48 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15061 battles
  • 1,294
  • [_7TH_] _7TH_
  • Member since:
    08-19-2013
Sources.

Kozzy #3 Posted 28 July 2017 - 11:49 AM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011
It sounds like you are saying you want it back, do you? 

imendars #4 Posted 28 July 2017 - 11:52 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10958 battles
  • 1,086
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

View PostKozzy, on 28 July 2017 - 01:49 PM, said:

It sounds like you are saying you want it back, do you? 

 

How to put this, I could use a professionally balanced td...:trollface:

 

EDIT: its back on China WoT test server. So 9.20 on China this gem will be back...


Edited by imendars, 28 July 2017 - 11:54 AM.


Frostilicus #5 Posted 28 July 2017 - 11:55 AM

    Major

  • Clan Diplomat
  • 22423 battles
  • 2,775
  • [-ZNO-] -ZNO-
  • Member since:
    07-12-2011
China servers are licensed by WG, so they can do what they like with them

BKatt #6 Posted 28 July 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 31335 battles
  • 383
  • Member since:
    04-28-2013
But this time it has a type 5 gun with a 6 shell clip.. Dun Dunn DUUUUNNNN!

Balc0ra #7 Posted 28 July 2017 - 12:54 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 64443 battles
  • 15,455
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Chinese server works the same way as console WOT does. So if you want the WT auf E-100... you can go there to.

dadek001 #8 Posted 28 July 2017 - 04:17 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 14101 battles
  • 8
  • [H0S] H0S
  • Member since:
    03-06-2014

I would really like that piece of tank again in my garage but who know maybe they will add it on EU server too 

something like they did to foch 155 make it special and give to players who purchased it in the past that should be fair to players whogrind it also there are not that many players who purchased it and still play this game so WTE100 will be rare seen in the battles :)

 



xtrem3x #9 Posted 28 July 2017 - 09:02 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 31635 battles
  • 1,354
  • [EFE-X] EFE-X
  • Member since:
    01-03-2013
It's on the console version still isn't it?

Nishi_Kinuyo #10 Posted 28 July 2017 - 09:09 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 7484 battles
  • 3,916
  • [GUP] GUP
  • Member since:
    05-28-2011

View Postqpranger, on 28 July 2017 - 10:38 AM, said:

So if I want to play it now I have to move to Chinese servers?

Europe suddenly not good enough? Not fair!!!

 

 

 

 

#AsianBias

#YellowLivesMatterMore

:girl:



XxKuzkina_MatxX #11 Posted 28 July 2017 - 10:16 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 47893 battles
  • 1,391
  • [RU18] RU18
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

It was a beautiful beast!

 



RamRaid90 #12 Posted 29 July 2017 - 08:56 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20586 battles
  • 6,286
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostKharlos76, on 28 July 2017 - 10:48 AM, said:

Sources.

 

It's on the supertest right now. Chinese server release every tank that goes to supertest as a premium tank you can purchase for ridiculous amounts of money.

 

View Postxtram3x, on 28 July 2017 - 08:02 PM, said:

It's on the console version still isn't it?

 

Yes, and the FV4202 is still the tier X british medium in blitz :P



roachex #13 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:22 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 20261 battles
  • 607
  • [RIGA] RIGA
  • Member since:
    06-01-2012
If WTE-100 return, it would get a great gun nerf. The gun was too reliable for an autoloader 560/750 alpha.

XxKuzkina_MatxX #14 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:26 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 47893 battles
  • 1,391
  • [RU18] RU18
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View Postroachex, on 29 July 2017 - 10:22 AM, said:

If WTE-100 return, it would get a great gun nerf. The gun was too reliable for an autoloader 560/750 alpha.

 

and the 50b gun is not reliable?

Plasma_Fire #15 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:30 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19581 battles
  • 722
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011

View PostXxKuzkina_MatxX, on 28 July 2017 - 10:16 PM, said:

It was a beautiful beast!

 

 

Is it really just me...

 

Watch this video at 3:50, He was reloading, he has close to a minute before he can shoot and the enemy tanks chose to hide from him while reloading rather than take the chance to win the game in a single blow.

 

That is what was wrong with the WT E100. The players who played against it. There was nothing wrong with the tank, it was rather easy to kill it, you just had to do it right. not unlike the T95. If you facehug a T95 you are going to lose.

 

The people who wanted to tank gone are the whining players who didnt really want to think about how to play against it.

 

He took 9 kills and 11,000 dmg in that game because he was allowed to. If the enemy players had some balls they would have won and he wouldnt have had 9 kills



XxKuzkina_MatxX #16 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:37 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 47893 battles
  • 1,391
  • [RU18] RU18
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View PostPlasma_Fire, on 29 July 2017 - 10:30 AM, said:

 

Is it really just me...

 

Watch this video at 3:50, He was reloading, he has close to a minute before he can shoot and the enemy tanks chose to hide from him while reloading rather than take the chance to win the game in a single blow.

 

That is what was wrong with the WT E100. The players who played against it. There was nothing wrong with the tank, it was rather easy to kill it, you just had to do it right. not unlike the T95. If you facehug a T95 you are going to lose.

 

The people who wanted to tank gone are the whining players who didnt really want to think about how to play against it.

 

He took 9 kills and 11,000 dmg in that game because he was allowed to. If the enemy players had some balls they would have won and he wouldnt have had 9 kills

 

That T34 panic shot tho :)

lord_chipmonk #17 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:38 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33268 battles
  • 10,215
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012

View PostPlasma_Fire, on 29 July 2017 - 09:30 AM, said:

 

Is it really just me...

 

Watch this video at 3:50, He was reloading, he has close to a minute before he can shoot and the enemy tanks chose to hide from him while reloading rather than take the chance to win the game in a single blow.

 

That is what was wrong with the WT E100. The players who played against it. There was nothing wrong with the tank, it was rather easy to kill it, you just had to do it right. not unlike the T95. If you facehug a T95 you are going to lose.

 

The people who wanted to tank gone are the whining players who didnt really want to think about how to play against it.

 

He took 9 kills and 11,000 dmg in that game because he was allowed to. If the enemy players had some balls they would have won and he wouldnt have had 9 kills

 

I beg to differ. The Wafflethrower had the ability to delete a tank in very short order, which was a problem. Game's better off without it. 

tajj7 #18 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:39 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 24849 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View PostPlasma_Fire, on 29 July 2017 - 08:30 AM, said:

There was nothing wrong with the tank, 

 

Utter nonsense, there was A LOT wrong with the tank and 2.8k damage in 8 seconds was 100% broken and could never be balanced. 

 

Hence why they removed it, it was a stupid broken tank and it should not be brought back in any form IMO. 



hson_hson #19 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:42 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 6487 battles
  • 154
  • Member since:
    08-19-2014

View Postxtram3x, on 28 July 2017 - 09:02 PM, said:

It's on the console version still isn't it?

 

 

Yup, in the PC pre-nerf state (6 shells etc)



XxKuzkina_MatxX #20 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:47 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 47893 battles
  • 1,391
  • [RU18] RU18
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016
 

View Posttajj7, on 29 July 2017 - 10:39 AM, said:

 

Utter nonsense, there was A LOT wrong with the tank and 2.8k damage in 8 seconds was 100% broken and could never be balanced. 

 

Hence why they removed it, it was a stupid broken tank and it should not be brought back in any form IMO. 

 

I am not gonna say anything cruel about that but..

  • every tank in the game can be balanced including the WT.
  • considering the new Foch with a potential damage of 2.4k in 10 seconds i'd say prepare some tissues.

Edited by XxKuzkina_MatxX, 29 July 2017 - 09:48 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users