Jump to content


This is not a name and shame thread


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
4 replies to this topic

Lilleman #1 Posted 29 July 2017 - 12:27 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38172 battles
  • 743
  • [TORSK] TORSK
  • Member since:
    03-22-2011

I trying to figure out how the O-I was planing to play. Is there a new way to play that I have missed? 
As I try to be a better player I love to know how it was thought to be played? 

*edit*

 


Edited by Jahrakajin, 29 July 2017 - 09:26 AM.
No naming and Shaming


RamRaid90 #2 Posted 29 July 2017 - 08:54 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 19683 battles
  • 5,852
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014
So it Is a name and shame thread?

Lilleman #3 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:07 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38172 battles
  • 743
  • [TORSK] TORSK
  • Member since:
    03-22-2011

View PostRamRaid90, on 29 July 2017 - 08:54 AM, said:

So it Is a name and shame thread?

 

Oh dearest me, of course not! Who has been named or shamed?
I just curious about the new tactic that all. 

Plasma_Fire #4 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:19 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19374 battles
  • 722
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011

It will be seen as a name and shame thread.

 

If you ignore the players actions I does show just how over powered the engine of the tank is when you see how high it can climb up the hill.



Jahrakajin #5 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:25 AM

  • Guest
This title totally didn't make me open the Thread and have a look. 

Since you're familiar with the N&S rule here on the Forum I hope you know about the in game report function and have used it. That's it. Bad game? Yeah, sucks but life goes on. 

Closed.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users