Jump to content


t26e4 need buff


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

SISQOBG #1 Posted 29 July 2017 - 10:37 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11135 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    08-04-2015
t26e4 need buff because he is really really slow,one of the slowest tanks in the game and because of this he cant flank,he cant go behind enemy tank,infact they will go behind you.this lead to one thing-you will face  90% of enemy tanks infront,and how much time you will penetrate with 192 pen and with this inaccurate and crap gun ?ok yeah he have armor but the armor is UNRELIABLE!!!the tank need ms buff or pen buff,with the new mm system is not big deal if he see tier 10 if wg decide to buff the tank.

SISQOBG #2 Posted 29 July 2017 - 10:43 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11135 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    08-04-2015
or etleast return the offer to sale a tank for 50% of the gold for another tank,to sell this garbage tank and buy another

lord_chipmonk #3 Posted 29 July 2017 - 11:01 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 32183 battles
  • 10,166
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012
Maybe I will have to replay the Super Pershing to confirm, but it seemed alright last time I played it.

JuliusCheddar #4 Posted 29 July 2017 - 11:03 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28024 battles
  • 564
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014
I sold mine cus couldn't stand the speed, but it seems like a capable tank. 

Edited by JuliusCheddar, 29 July 2017 - 11:03 AM.


ThebaldEagle #5 Posted 29 July 2017 - 11:10 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 750 battles
  • 367
  • Member since:
    02-13-2014

Who is he ???

or maby you drive the SP the wrong way just saying......

Maby rush tiers was not good for you.



Crow_Eschatologist #6 Posted 29 July 2017 - 12:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 23021 battles
  • 287
  • Member since:
    08-13-2012

It plays substantially better than it used to, especially with the gun improvements and when liberally seasoned with a generous portion of APCR.

 

That said, it is still a 1-trick pony with a relatively poor trick and like all of the older restricted matchmaking premiums has suffered dreadfully from an insidious combination of steady power creep and the egregious matchmaker sodomy that was recently implemented leaving it in the invidious position of being a 'moneymaker' that requires sinking most of its profits into performance enhancers (APCR, possibly fuel).

 

It's hard to recommend any of the restricted mm tier 8 tanks at present due to this, as in order to remain profitable they require a steady stream of weaker vehicles to exploit and they simply are not in receipt of that at present.

 

p.s. Whether a mechanism whereby the primary moneymaking vehicles by design exploit weaker, lower-tiered vehicles can be accurately designated as anything other than toxic is another discussion but one suspects it's hard to justify from a gameplay perspective.


Edited by Crow_Eschatologist, 29 July 2017 - 12:05 PM.


Phobos4321 #7 Posted 29 July 2017 - 01:52 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 42846 battles
  • 7,837
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

well its always the others ?

why couldnt you think about it before buying it ? i mean the SP was never fast and always know to be a heavium

 

thought calling it one of the slowest tanks in the game ? apologize to almost every single british heavy/td  (tog2 anyone?)

T95, FCM 36 Pak40 ...

 

next time use your brain before your wallet  



theSwedishTankDriver #8 Posted 30 July 2017 - 12:43 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23388 battles
  • 950
  • [KITTY] KITTY
  • Member since:
    03-04-2013
its way too slow and the gun suck

RockyRoller #9 Posted 30 July 2017 - 02:12 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28287 battles
  • 1,135
  • [NR-NS] NR-NS
  • Member since:
    06-15-2016
The only point or warning in this thread is buyer beware, go look at the stats before spending real money.

Tinbawx #10 Posted 30 July 2017 - 05:46 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14726 battles
  • 1,219
  • [SNOB] SNOB
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011
Sure,let´s buff every single tank before looking at the reason for why buffs are demanded for basically all the tanks and dealing with that. Because logic and reason.......

Bucifel #11 Posted 30 July 2017 - 04:34 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27780 battles
  • 1,373
  • [3NRGY] 3NRGY
  • Member since:
    03-18-2013

and? you think all tanks should be similar and able do perform any role? AGAIN? :facepalm:

you know that some tanks must be slow and armored (like 26E4 even if its a medium), some able to flank, some for snipe...etc and NOT all similar?



ZlatanArKung #12 Posted 30 July 2017 - 05:21 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
Give it a MM that is not filled with T9 tanks in 70%+ of the games and it would be rather decent again.

Currently it mostly struggles due to horrible T8 MM

japtank #13 Posted 30 July 2017 - 05:27 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27611 battles
  • 1,046
  • Member since:
    04-20-2012

View PostZlatanArKung, on 30 July 2017 - 05:21 PM, said:

Give it a MM that is not filled with T9 tanks in 70%+ of the games and it would be rather decent again.

Currently it mostly struggles due to horrible T8 MM

 

Yep, that's the only problem.

The tank is decent but mostly sees VIII+IX games where it's armor doesn't matter, so you're left with a slow turd.



ZlatanArKung #14 Posted 30 July 2017 - 05:43 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View Postjaptank, on 30 July 2017 - 05:27 PM, said:

 

Yep, that's the only problem.

The tank is decent but mostly sees VIII+IX games where it's armor doesn't matter, so you're left with a slow turd.

 

Which is same issue as Liberte face.

And Tiger II (to a lesser extent) and IS-6 etc.

 

T8 are currently screwed by MM and a better MM for T8 is far more important (in my opinion) then a bUff to T8 tanks.

 

If this new T8 MM isn't what WG was aiming for, and in that case, every T8 tank except Defender should recieve a massive buff.



Cannes76 #15 Posted 30 July 2017 - 07:21 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 62518 battles
  • 1,478
  • [3V] 3V
  • Member since:
    04-16-2011
Tier 8 MM should get alot better with next patch when Grand battles are launched, I hope...

SABAOTH #16 Posted 30 July 2017 - 07:30 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 36420 battles
  • 2,908
  • [-133-] -133-
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011

View PostSISQOBG, on 29 July 2017 - 10:37 AM, said:

t26e4 need buff because he is really really slow,one of the slowest tanks in the game and because of this he cant flank,he cant go behind enemy tank,infact they will go behind you.this lead to one thing-you will face  90% of enemy tanks infront,and how much time you will penetrate with 192 pen and with this inaccurate and crap gun ?ok yeah he have armor but the armor is UNRELIABLE!!!the tank need ms buff or pen buff,with the new mm system is not big deal if he see tier 10 if wg decide to buff the tank.

 

They give you back the gold for sp.

 

Nowadays is far better than when it was released, speed and gun wise.

 

Not exceptional but decent :coin:



SISQOBG #17 Posted 02 August 2017 - 10:19 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 11135 battles
  • 18
  • Member since:
    08-04-2015
the tank need buff because of his speed he is facing all tanks frontally,and good luck to penetrate all tier 8 and 9 with this garbage gun

Baldrickk #18 Posted 02 August 2017 - 12:02 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 29077 battles
  • 12,903
  • [-TAH-] -TAH-
  • Member since:
    03-03-2013

View PostSISQOBG, on 02 August 2017 - 10:19 AM, said:

the tank need buff because of his speed he is facing all tanks frontally,and good luck to penetrate all tier 8 and 9 with this garbage gun

Yeah, no.

 

It's slow, Yes, but hardly the slowest.

The gun's pen was buffed not too long ago and if you fire premium rounds you have the same pen as tier X medium tanks, which you cant meet.



STRAPATONI #19 Posted 02 August 2017 - 12:04 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 20452 battles
  • 183
  • [-GODS] -GODS
  • Member since:
    09-05-2013

View PostBaldrickk, on 02 August 2017 - 11:02 AM, said:

Yeah, no.

 

It's slow, Yes, but hardly the slowest.

The gun's pen was buffed not too long ago and if you fire premium rounds you have the same pen as tier X medium tanks, which you cant meet.

 

all tanks got buffed now, so why not? its need to advanced a long with others. its no more a OP  as it was.

Ankara_Aatu #20 Posted 02 August 2017 - 12:07 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 31640 battles
  • 562
  • [RIOD] RIOD
  • Member since:
    04-11-2015

It's certainly not great against things like Chrysler, Liberte and Defender. You can still easily pen the front of anything the tank meets if you use premium rounds. As said before in this thread, it does sometimes suck at making credits if you have to fire a lot of premium. On average it still makes decent credits, unless you deliberately spam gold at everything.

 

Personally I feel that other tanks' armor was never really a problem for the SP, since it has the amazing premium shells. Rather the problem is tanks with super high penetration, such as the Skorpion G, that can just go through the spaced armor with AP, leaving the SP pretty much defenseless.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users