Jump to content


9.20 BUFFS can we have some love for OBJ 260


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

Nietzche #1 Posted 29 July 2017 - 06:19 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 29130 battles
  • 38
  • [JDUN] JDUN
  • Member since:
    03-03-2011
considering the buff to IS7 maybe we could get some love for Obj260  plis ?

JuliusCheddar #2 Posted 29 July 2017 - 06:20 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28128 battles
  • 564
  • [NSORY] NSORY
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014

And what exactly is it lacking? 

I hope you don't want to give it heavy armor considering it is a 20 specific power vehicle? That would be silly, right? 


Edited by JuliusCheddar, 29 July 2017 - 06:21 PM.


brumbarr #3 Posted 29 July 2017 - 06:36 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostJuliusCheddar, on 29 July 2017 - 06:20 PM, said:

And what exactly is it lacking? 

I hope you don't want to give it heavy armor considering it is a 20 specific power vehicle? That would be silly, right? 

Guess what the is7 buff does? 

 



laulaur #4 Posted 29 July 2017 - 07:19 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46460 battles
  • 986
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011

View PostJuliusCheddar, on 29 July 2017 - 05:20 PM, said:

And what exactly is it lacking? 

I hope you don't want to give it heavy armor considering it is a 20 specific power vehicle? That would be silly, right? 

 

View Postbrumbarr, on 29 July 2017 - 05:36 PM, said:

Guess what the is7 buff does? 

 

Hmmm, IS7 gets some engine power, gun handling and 200 something hp....

Considering this i think the OP wants more engine power then and to be reclassified as a med :trollface:



brumbarr #5 Posted 29 July 2017 - 07:55 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Postlaulaur, on 29 July 2017 - 07:19 PM, said:

 

 

Hmmm, IS7 gets some engine power, gun handling and 200 something hp....

Considering this i think the OP wants more engine power then and to be reclassified as a med :trollface:

Is7 gets  the same hpt as 260 next patch, and it has much better armour...



HunterXHunter8 #6 Posted 29 July 2017 - 07:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33093 battles
  • 941
  • Member since:
    04-27-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 29 July 2017 - 07:55 PM, said:

Is7 gets  the same hpt as 260 next patch, and it has much better armour...

 

the gun is far worse, so i don't see the point

Nietzche #7 Posted 29 July 2017 - 08:02 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 29130 battles
  • 38
  • [JDUN] JDUN
  • Member since:
    03-03-2011

 I think HP and some turret armor would balance it out considering current meta

 

 

*whispers* and an autoloader  Kappa



sgtYester #8 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:06 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53382 battles
  • 1,515
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011
is7 should never get a buff, unless it gets a cupola to shoot at when hull down.

JuliusCheddar #9 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:19 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 28128 battles
  • 564
  • [NSORY] NSORY
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014

View PostHunterXHunter8, on 29 July 2017 - 07:57 PM, said:

 

the gun is far worse, so i don't see the point

Also, idk about 260 but is7 has some horrible ground resistances. 



brumbarr #10 Posted 29 July 2017 - 09:54 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostJuliusCheddar, on 29 July 2017 - 09:19 PM, said:

Also, idk about 260 but is7 has some horrible ground resistances. 

260 has the exact same groundresistance.

Imagine an is7 with 2400 hp , gunhandling of 260 and just as fast.

Thats the is7 in patch 9.20.



Shizuthink #11 Posted 29 July 2017 - 10:39 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34412 battles
  • 748
  • [ZEON] ZEON
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 29 July 2017 - 08:54 PM, said:

260 has the exact same groundresistance.

Imagine an is7 with 2400 hp , gunhandling of 260 and just as fast.

Thats the is7 in patch 9.20.

 

In the 9.20 patch notes on the EU website there is no mention about an engine buff though. Just the gunhandling and HP buffs.

GekkoGordon #12 Posted 29 July 2017 - 10:44 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 4037 battles
  • 275
  • [-VUK-] -VUK-
  • Member since:
    04-17-2012
Did you just say 260 needs buffs? smh....i guess people will soon be saying T67 needs buffs...poor obj 260 with its 250mm weakspot armor and that 0.13/0.13/0.06 with stabs gun handling....350 turret....such a weak tank

ZlatanArKung #13 Posted 29 July 2017 - 10:55 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014
WG please buff T67 and Defender and the Jap heavy line.

Just give them 50mm more armour at every spot.

ExclamationMark #14 Posted 29 July 2017 - 11:01 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013
Wtf? It's already one of the best T10 heavies. :amazed:

XxKuzkina_MatxX #15 Posted 29 July 2017 - 11:19 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 47642 battles
  • 1,378
  • [RU18] RU18
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016
You can have all the IS7 armor if the IS7 can have your heat rounds :justwait:

brumbarr #16 Posted 29 July 2017 - 11:43 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostShizubot, on 29 July 2017 - 10:39 PM, said:

 

In the 9.20 patch notes on the EU website there is no mention about an engine buff though. Just the gunhandling and HP buffs.

I read this:

  • Added the M-50TI engine
  • Removed the M-50T engine

 

Which is the engine buff.



Shizuthink #17 Posted 30 July 2017 - 11:11 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34412 battles
  • 748
  • [ZEON] ZEON
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 29 July 2017 - 10:43 PM, said:

I read this:

  • Added the M-50TI engine
  • Removed the M-50T engine

 

Which is the engine buff.

 

Maybe I'm blind but I can't see that on the offical website. What it says for me:

 

 

"IS-7

Update 9.20 sets the course for the Soviet heavy tank revision with the rebalance of the IS-7. Poor gun handling and moderate accuracy made it unfeasible for it to land a precise shot, especially on the move, and often left a player feeling outclassed by almost every other Tier X heavy tank. To give the IS-7 a much-needed leg-up, we reduced its aiming time, and dispersion on the move and from the turret. This should allow it to fully realize its firepower, while the 2,400 HP will ensure its longevity. Together, these changes are designed to stress the IS-7’s role as a close-range breakthrough vehicle that can effectively lead an attack."



brumbarr #18 Posted 30 July 2017 - 11:18 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostShizubot, on 30 July 2017 - 11:11 AM, said:

 

Maybe I'm blind but I can't see that on the offical website. What it says for me:

 

 

"IS-7

Update 9.20 sets the course for the Soviet heavy tank revision with the rebalance of the IS-7. Poor gun handling and moderate accuracy made it unfeasible for it to land a precise shot, especially on the move, and often left a player feeling outclassed by almost every other Tier X heavy tank. To give the IS-7 a much-needed leg-up, we reduced its aiming time, and dispersion on the move and from the turret. This should allow it to fully realize its firepower, while the 2,400 HP will ensure its longevity. Together, these changes are designed to stress the IS-7’s role as a close-range breakthrough vehicle that can effectively lead an attack."

Hmmm, I got my information of the wot blogs. 

Maybe WG forgot to mention it. I hope you are correct though, is7 buffs would be perfect withoit the engine buff.



Shizuthink #19 Posted 30 July 2017 - 11:21 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 34412 battles
  • 748
  • [ZEON] ZEON
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013

View Postbrumbarr, on 30 July 2017 - 10:18 AM, said:

Hmmm, I got my information of the wot blogs. 

Maybe WG forgot to mention it. I hope you are correct though, is7 buffs would be perfect withoit the engine buff.

 

Yeah, I think the gun handling buff alone would be enough.

brumbarr #20 Posted 30 July 2017 - 11:24 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostShizubot, on 30 July 2017 - 11:21 AM, said:

 

Yeah, I think the gun handling buff alone would be enough.

Not to mention the hp buff. 

With the engine buff it makes the chinese heaviums kinda pointless.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users