Jump to content


Has the Idea


  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

Liviguy #1 Posted 30 July 2017 - 09:40 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12461 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-12-2016
Has the idea of a players union ever been discussed before?

Bora_BOOM #2 Posted 30 July 2017 - 09:50 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 20204 battles
  • 2,483
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

qpranger's like worth post ...

Sai no mo'



Liviguy #3 Posted 30 July 2017 - 09:53 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12461 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-12-2016

View PostBora_BOOM, on 30 July 2017 - 09:50 PM, said:

qpranger's like worth post ...

Sai no mo'

Not got a clue what your post means.



unhappy_bunny #4 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:22 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17409 battles
  • 2,131
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

You mean like a trades union? Collective bargaining? Strikes if WG don't accede to our demands?

 



Liviguy #5 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:23 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12461 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-12-2016
Well an organisation to represent the player base.

Spurtung #6 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:24 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60081 battles
  • 5,474
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostLiviguy, on 30 July 2017 - 10:40 PM, said:

Has the idea of a players union ever been discussed before?

 

Not by rational people.

Carry on.



FluffyRedFox #7 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:28 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 21564 battles
  • 7,691
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    12-05-2012
no

Liviguy #8 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:33 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12461 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-12-2016

View PostSpurtung, on 30 July 2017 - 10:24 PM, said:

 

Not by rational people.

Carry on.

 

You think the idea is crazy, do you?

qpranger #9 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:42 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30706 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostLiviguy, on 30 July 2017 - 11:33 PM, said:

 

You think the idea is crazy, do you?

 

Some people are just blinkered, too set in their ways, too afraid to take a decisive step. WOT players would certainly benefit from a union that amplifies our concerns.

Liviguy #10 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:46 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12461 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-12-2016

View Postqpranger, on 30 July 2017 - 10:42 PM, said:

 

Some people are just blinkered, too set in their ways, too afraid to take a decisive step. WOT players would certainly benefit from a union that amplifies our concerns.

I think it could be beneficial to the game, the player base and ultimately WG itself.



BravelyRanAway #11 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:49 PM

    General

  • Beta Tester
  • 22194 battles
  • 8,091
  • [H_I_T] H_I_T
  • Member since:
    12-29-2010

View PostLiviguy, on 30 July 2017 - 09:46 PM, said:

I think it could be beneficial to the game, the player base and ultimately WG itself.

 

It won't work...there are those who'd TK fellow union members thinking they're doing them a favour.....a lot of duffers in WoT!

Liviguy #12 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:50 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12461 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-12-2016

View PostBravelyRanAway, on 30 July 2017 - 10:49 PM, said:

 

It won't work...there are those who'd TK fellow union members thinking they're doing them a favour.....a lot of duffers in WoT!

 

TK?

Spurtung #13 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:53 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60081 battles
  • 5,474
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostLiviguy, on 30 July 2017 - 11:33 PM, said:

 

You think the idea is crazy, do you?

 

What made you think that?

Liviguy #14 Posted 30 July 2017 - 10:58 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12461 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-12-2016

View PostSpurtung, on 30 July 2017 - 10:53 PM, said:

 

What made you think that?

 

Well remain without influence.

Nokkeli #15 Posted 30 July 2017 - 11:02 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17489 battles
  • 1,038
  • [SWEDH] SWEDH
  • Member since:
    11-22-2012

I was going to write something but this idea is so dumb that i decided not to.



Liviguy #16 Posted 30 July 2017 - 11:04 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12461 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-12-2016

View PostNokkeli, on 30 July 2017 - 11:02 PM, said:

I was going to write something but this idea is so dumb that i decided not to.

 

Have you read your post?



Spurtung #17 Posted 30 July 2017 - 11:04 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60081 battles
  • 5,474
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostLiviguy, on 30 July 2017 - 11:58 PM, said:

 

Well remain without influence.

 

Ever heard of the NAVI? That team, as a whole, has quit the game. Do you think you'd have more influence than they? Keep dreaming, but WG doesn't give a flying f.

Liviguy #18 Posted 30 July 2017 - 11:06 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12461 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-12-2016

View PostSpurtung, on 30 July 2017 - 11:04 PM, said:

 

Ever heard of the NAVI? That team, as a whole, has quit the game. Do you think you'd have more influence than they? Keep dreaming, but WG doesn't give a flying f.

 

No never heard of them? Who were they? 

Spurtung #19 Posted 30 July 2017 - 11:09 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60081 battles
  • 5,474
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostLiviguy, on 31 July 2017 - 12:06 AM, said:

 

No never heard of them? Who were they? 

No google-fu in the "union"?

 

http://read.navi-gaming.com/team_news/natus_vincere_release_wot_roster

Liviguy #20 Posted 30 July 2017 - 11:10 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 12461 battles
  • 345
  • Member since:
    01-12-2016
Edited

Edited by Asklepi0s, 01 August 2017 - 09:09 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users