Jump to content


Arrogant Q&A....


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

Zoltan1251 #1 Posted 31 July 2017 - 09:43 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11079 battles
  • 538
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013
https://thearmoredpa...017/#more-53556

Is it really necessary to be Edited in Q&A?.... One thing is being funny and answering stupid question and second is being arrogant Edited !

Do you guys think WG is crossing the line with these like me or do you think its still OK? Why do they even have this if they are not willing to answer anything?

Edited by Asklepi0s, 01 August 2017 - 08:47 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks


Phobos4321 #2 Posted 31 July 2017 - 09:47 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 43226 battles
  • 8,402
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011
well they had serb and storm since long so that is something new to you ?

Zoltan1251 #3 Posted 31 July 2017 - 09:54 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11079 battles
  • 538
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013

View PostPhobos4321, on 31 July 2017 - 09:47 PM, said:

well they had serb and storm since long so that is something new to you ?

 

standards were poor but this is new low

250swb #4 Posted 31 July 2017 - 09:57 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 22676 battles
  • 5,071
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
Saw that, the dev 'FlushDraw' is the sort of guy WG should keep locked in a cupboard, and then lose the key.

Spurtung #5 Posted 31 July 2017 - 10:02 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63814 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostZoltan1251, on 31 July 2017 - 10:54 PM, said:

 

standards were poor but this is new low

 

How so? Only thing I saw there was their unwillingness to say things they didn't want to say. The questions were too simplistic, why would anyone say anything?

Asking, for example. what is the direction they want the game going in the long term and what's being done about that would have been a much smarter approach.



laulaur #6 Posted 31 July 2017 - 10:04 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46713 battles
  • 986
  • [BLAUR] BLAUR
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011

Q: Will the MM get changed? The past few days I was a top tier only five times!
A: How terrible! The matchmaker will try to prevent such situations by forcefully putting you into a top tier if you’ve been on the bottom too much, and vice versa, but if the queue time would be too long, you will be dropped into a random team.

 



Alabamatick #7 Posted 31 July 2017 - 10:11 PM

    Lieutenant Сolonel

  • Player
  • 31849 battles
  • 3,020
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011
You expected anything less from W.G ?

TsundereWaffle #8 Posted 31 July 2017 - 10:30 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 27220 battles
  • 11,018
  • [LEWD] LEWD
  • Member since:
    03-31-2013
I don't see anything wrong in this Q&A

Tidal_Force #9 Posted 31 July 2017 - 10:33 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 16192 battles
  • 6,839
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-29-2012

View PostWafflePanzer, on 31 July 2017 - 09:30 PM, said:

I don't see anything wrong in this Q&A

 

It's a cheap knock-off of original recipe SerB, that's what wrong. This didn't even come up with own version of "How terrible".

Edited by Tidal_Force, 31 July 2017 - 10:33 PM.


Phobos4321 #10 Posted 31 July 2017 - 10:44 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 43226 battles
  • 8,402
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

View PostZoltan1251, on 31 July 2017 - 09:54 PM, said:

 

standards were poor but this is new low

 

really ? is it lower than the arty is a class for autist- statement ?

laulaur #11 Posted 31 July 2017 - 10:46 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46713 battles
  • 986
  • [BLAUR] BLAUR
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011

View PostPhobos4321, on 31 July 2017 - 09:44 PM, said:

 

really ? is it lower than the arty is a class for autist- statement ?

 

At least that statement is true.

That MM mumbo-jumbo and many other things from that Q&A are pure crap....



DracheimFlug #12 Posted 31 July 2017 - 10:53 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 8957 battles
  • 4,033
  • Member since:
    11-13-2014
Most of those are really stupid questions. Other than maybe the MM answer, I am not sure what was especially arrogant about the replies, and as others have said, there have been much worse in the past, especially when SerB was answering personally.

Rato_Black_Baron #13 Posted 31 July 2017 - 11:52 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 31160 battles
  • 459
  • Member since:
    02-22-2013

View PostZoltan1251, on 31 July 2017 - 08:43 PM, said:

Is it really necessary to be Edited in Q&A?.... 

Yes. Something different it’s not planned right now.


Edited by Asklepi0s, 01 August 2017 - 08:48 AM.


XxKuzkina_MatxX #14 Posted 01 August 2017 - 12:50 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49711 battles
  • 1,768
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

When they (and they are russians) are dealing with a player base mostly made up of weaklings with deep pockets who will kiss your feet for some pixel tanks then yeah that's about the right attitude!



_EXODUZ_ #15 Posted 01 August 2017 - 01:54 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34979 battles
  • 1,938
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

View PostXxKuzkina_MatxX, on 01 August 2017 - 12:50 AM, said:

When they (and they are russians) are dealing with a player base mostly made up of weaklings with deep pockets who will kiss your feet for some pixel tanks then yeah that's about the right attitude!

 

You sound Ukrainian to me.

XxKuzkina_MatxX #16 Posted 01 August 2017 - 02:07 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 49711 battles
  • 1,768
  • [OXIDE] OXIDE
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 01 August 2017 - 02:54 AM, said:

 

You sound Ukrainian to me.

 

Not really my friend, but you sound (in your posts i mean) quite nice :)

Wintermute_1 #17 Posted 01 August 2017 - 02:43 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 44227 battles
  • 1,581
  • Member since:
    11-25-2013
Free Phelan!

Negativvv #18 Posted 01 August 2017 - 06:22 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 8993 battles
  • 1,015
  • [KEKE] KEKE
  • Member since:
    08-08-2015

The MM answers were lol but the truth. Playing T6 late at night is hell as you're a T8 feeder every game.

 

Wish they'd acknowledge the physics issue as the smaller fast tanks have moon buggy like launch abilities, heavier stuff feels fine...



Enforcer1975 #19 Posted 01 August 2017 - 06:37 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 20760 battles
  • 10,865
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    05-04-2014

View Postlaulaur, on 31 July 2017 - 10:04 PM, said:

...but if the queue time would be too long, you will be dropped into a random team.

And there is the problem. How patient are players if it means getting better MM? 5 seconds in queue is already too long for quite a few from the sound of it that's why this option exists. They can never get it right. 



Zoltan1251 #20 Posted 01 August 2017 - 08:44 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 11079 battles
  • 538
  • [SPIKE] SPIKE
  • Member since:
    02-27-2013

View PostDracheimFlug, on 31 July 2017 - 10:53 PM, said:

Most of those are really stupid questions. Other than maybe the MM answer, I am not sure what was especially arrogant about the replies, and as others have said, there have been much worse in the past, especially when SerB was answering personally.

 

ok so you say they are all stupid questions.... good point, maybe they are, for some players watching news daily.... for some they are legit questions.... and even if the questions are "how do i shoot my tank?" they should answer it if they have QnA, be it in a funny way..... it obviously is annoying to devs that they have to sacrifice 15 minutes of their time so why even have it?.... by arrogant i meant replies "we will infrom you... you will see.... check portal... when its done... when we decide", like wtf is that?!

and btw, Serbs QnAs were very insightful into what they are trying to achieve etc..... so i dont know what you are talking about




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users