Jump to content


BatChat remains OP - snowflakes won

bat chat nerf

  • Please log in to reply
98 replies to this topic

the_nebuchadnezzar #1 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:10 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 47722 battles
  • 1,138
  • Member since:
    08-19-2013
WG: „We know how many of you hold the Bat.-Châtillon 25 t. dear. So do we! Upon considering your feedback on the changes we planned to introduce, we took a step back to review the testing results and didn't find a solid enough reason to rebalance this treasured vehicle. We will leave it unchanged for now“. 
So, just cause all the snowflakes in WoT cried very loud about the proposal of balance the BatChat, which is OP, there is no denial, WG decide to back down, just cause they don`t want to upset a few players. This is interesting to say at least...

Edited by the_nebuchadnezzar, 03 August 2017 - 05:57 PM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to red text use.


cro001 #2 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:13 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 29529 battles
  • 1,920
  • Member since:
    10-21-2012
*Edited

Edited by Nohe21, 03 August 2017 - 01:38 PM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to disrespectful comments.


Junglist_ #3 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:15 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 37112 battles
  • 1,348
  • Member since:
    06-17-2013

Hahahahaha.

Good.



StinkyStonky #4 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:16 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 28329 battles
  • 2,144
  • [-SJA-] -SJA-
  • Member since:
    11-02-2015

View Postcro001, on 03 August 2017 - 12:13 PM, said:

*Edited

 

*Edited


Edited by Nohe21, 03 August 2017 - 01:39 PM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to not being constructive.


qpranger #5 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:17 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32438 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

So, pestering WG does work sometimes. 

Let us now start a petition to reintroduce

the WT auf E100 in the EU cluster!!!! 

Who is with me?



imendars #6 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:30 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10983 battles
  • 1,086
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014
GoOd NeWs

Edited by imendars, 03 August 2017 - 01:30 PM.


Kozzy #7 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:32 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 38855 battles
  • 2,705
  • [EAB2] EAB2
  • Member since:
    06-29-2011

View Postqpranger, on 03 August 2017 - 12:17 PM, said:

So, pestering WG does work sometimes. 

Let us now start a petition to reintroduce

the WT auf E100 in the EU cluster!!!! 

Who is with me?

 

How sure are you that you want this tank back in the game? ;)

 

OP.  Would you say the Maus is over powered too?



Enderman21 #8 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:40 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 26607 battles
  • 274
  • [-BSF-] -BSF-
  • Member since:
    11-11-2012
It's not your fault, learn to play.

CoDiGGo #9 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14997 battles
  • 569
  • [NEUR0] NEUR0
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

 

 

OP tank curve. A bot program will also overperform with Defender

 


Edited by CoDiGGo, 03 August 2017 - 01:45 PM.


qpranger #10 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:42 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32438 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostKozzy, on 03 August 2017 - 02:32 PM, said:

 

How sure are you that you want this tank back in the game? ;)

 

I like the way it looks,

don't give a toss about its stats.

I am shallow, just deal with it.



Homer_J #11 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:43 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28712 battles
  • 30,024
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
I liked the proposed changes. :(

qpranger #12 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:45 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 32438 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View PostHomer_J, on 03 August 2017 - 02:43 PM, said:

I liked the proposed changes. :(

 

Crucify him!!!!!!

SuperDuperOtter #13 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:45 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 15097 battles
  • 1,311
  • [_7TH_] _7TH_
  • Member since:
    08-19-2013

View PostHomer_J, on 03 August 2017 - 12:43 PM, said:

I liked the proposed changes. :(

 

It would have been great as an alternative. Not a replacement.

Edited by Kharlos76, 03 August 2017 - 01:45 PM.


CoDiGGo #14 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:47 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 14997 battles
  • 569
  • [NEUR0] NEUR0
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015

View PostHomer_J, on 03 August 2017 - 01:43 PM, said:

I liked the proposed changes. :(

 

:angry:

commer #15 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:50 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38082 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011
A tank in which baddies struggly and goods only slightly overperform is OP? L2P

Swoopie #16 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:55 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 28355 battles
  • 2,529
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-15-2011

View Postcommer, on 03 August 2017 - 02:50 PM, said:

A tank in which baddies struggly and goods only slightly overperform is OP? L2P

 

Cant have tanks in the game that reward skill, those are so unfair. We need more idiotproof tanks like Maus and Type 5, that'll surely be good for the gameplay

Edited by Swoopie, 03 August 2017 - 01:55 PM.


Jumping_Turtle #17 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:55 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 61319 battles
  • 5,303
  • [CNUT] CNUT
  • Member since:
    10-15-2013
So I read tons of complaints that WG never listens, for once they do and still people complain .......

imendars #18 Posted 03 August 2017 - 01:57 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10983 battles
  • 1,086
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

View PostJumping_Turtle, on 03 August 2017 - 03:55 PM, said:

So I read tons of complaints that WG never listens, for once they do and still people complain .......

 

Well, some people hate that tank.

 

I personally LOVE it cause thats my next tier 10... :trollface:



anonym_YNch2j0j5oJ9 #19 Posted 03 August 2017 - 02:00 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 0 battles
  • 689
  • Member since:
    09-24-2018

View Postthe_nebuchadnezzar, on 03 August 2017 - 02:10 PM, said:

WG: „We know how many of you hold the Bat.-Châtillon 25 t. dear. So do we! Upon considering your feedback on the changes we planned to introduce, we took a step back to review the testing results and didn't find a solid enough reason to rebalance this treasured vehicle. We will leave it unchanged for now“. 
So, just cause all the snowflakes in WoT cried very load about the proposal of balance the BatChat, which is OP, there is no denial, WG decide to back down, just cause they don`t want to upset a few players. This is interesting to say at least...

 

OP? Well the WT Auf E100 was completely broken yet after 645 battles in it, u managed 2.2k dmg per game, BC has average pen with terrible gun handling, bad + average players suck terribly in it.. 
Have u played the BC25t? Nope, you haven't.
Let me guess, you got shot 3-5 times by positioning yourself like a braindead player and now u cry...

Edited by Press2ForSkill, 03 August 2017 - 02:00 PM.


Sir_Bad #20 Posted 03 August 2017 - 02:02 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 45098 battles
  • 494
  • Member since:
    10-08-2011

The Bat-Chat is probably the tank on 10, that scales best with the skills of its driver. If you can't deal with that, then may I suggest that you git gud get yourself a Type 5?

 

The nerf was just completely idiotic tbh. If they want people to be interested in the t10 LT, maybe it would have been a good idea to not nerf them into oblivion before releasing them, but hey, it's WG we are talking about.







Also tagged with bat chat, nerf

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users