Jump to content


Chinese medium buff GOT REJECTED


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

scorpiontank1 #1 Posted 03 August 2017 - 11:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26325 battles
  • 837
  • [ARG] ARG
  • Member since:
    10-12-2012

Oh so u were hyped about t34-3/type59/59_patton buff ? 

 

Guess what , WG decided the buffs will make these tanks over powered and thus they declined them from super test 

 

Because F****ck you that's why 

 

I actually bought 59 Patton when it was on discount cause I knew it was getting pen buff , but nope !!!

 

 

9.20 common test note didn't have any changes on Chinese tanks 


Edited by scorpiontank1, 03 August 2017 - 11:44 PM.


JuliusCheddar #2 Posted 03 August 2017 - 11:42 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 29494 battles
  • 564
  • [3BPAN] 3BPAN
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014
Well that's pretty dumb

Edited by JuliusCheddar, 03 August 2017 - 11:43 PM.


shane73tank #3 Posted 03 August 2017 - 11:44 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 28146 battles
  • 2,018
  • [USAGI] USAGI
  • Member since:
    03-01-2014
Source ?  I did the same with the 59patton 

Warzey #4 Posted 03 August 2017 - 11:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 57073 battles
  • 949
  • Member since:
    04-29-2011

As far as I can see, there are no changes for the british and chinese mediums on the current iteration of the test server. Maybe we'll see these changes on the next iteration of the test server. It's too early to say that changes were canceled, especially when you take into consideration that 9.20 should go live at the end of the August.



Pandabird #5 Posted 03 August 2017 - 11:56 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 33973 battles
  • 4,526
  • [KOFF] KOFF
  • Member since:
    05-19-2013
well duh, it's not retarded so it has to be cancelled.

_EXODUZ_ #6 Posted 04 August 2017 - 12:12 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34979 battles
  • 1,938
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014
IS7 hasn't been touched either, so relax for now.

Balc0ra #7 Posted 04 August 2017 - 12:22 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66256 battles
  • 16,237
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012
Oh I would not panic yet. As others have pointed out.. There are other known buffs not there either like the IS-7. And it's not the first time they have held back most changes for stage 2, when there are as many changes and buffs as this time. So that might be it to.

commer #8 Posted 04 August 2017 - 12:44 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 38082 battles
  • 1,995
  • Member since:
    06-14-2011
Type59 - OP - AHAHAHAHHAHAHHHHHA

SP_BELLEROPHON_2016 #9 Posted 04 August 2017 - 07:11 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 6239 battles
  • 11
  • [HELAF] HELAF
  • Member since:
    11-17-2016
Me2 bought 59 Patton when it was on discount cause I knew it was getting pen buff

Edited by SP_BELLEROPHON_2016, 04 August 2017 - 07:12 AM.


Dragonlordcv #10 Posted 04 August 2017 - 07:28 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23980 battles
  • 861
  • Member since:
    03-10-2012

Why still give money to WG after all these changes i wonder....... Its very clear that it sh*ts on our faces in every update and when 

ppl still reward them imo is quite stupid (or they are too drunk to notice the difference - i rest my case there:hiding:).



leggasiini #11 Posted 04 August 2017 - 07:38 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14130 battles
  • 6,191
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012
9.20.1 probably?

Homer_J #12 Posted 04 August 2017 - 07:42 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28692 battles
  • 29,991
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View Postscorpiontank1, on 03 August 2017 - 11:40 PM, said:

 

I actually bought 59 Patton when it was on discount cause I knew it was getting pen buff , but nope !!!

 

 

You knew nothing.  There was a "leak" from supertest.  But nothing from supertest is ever guaranteed to make it to live.  You got mugged by yourself!



brumbarr #13 Posted 04 August 2017 - 07:58 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 04 August 2017 - 12:12 AM, said:

IS7 hasn't been touched either, so relax for now.

Whut? The put the is7 buff in their announcement video of the test server yesterday.

I hole it doesnt make it though, with the engine buff its just better than the chinese meds and 260.



tajj7 #14 Posted 04 August 2017 - 08:59 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25404 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View Post_EXODUZ_, on 03 August 2017 - 11:12 PM, said:

IS7 hasn't been touched either, so relax for now.

 

IS7 was buffed, has 2400 HP on test, better aim time and now has 1200 HP. Still felt quite sluggish to me though, struggled to get it much past 40 on flat ground, Obj. 260 still seems to accelerate a lot better. 

 

----------------------------------------------

 

I don't think the changes have been cancelled they have just not made it into this test, so they are either next patch or might be next test version. 



_EXODUZ_ #15 Posted 04 August 2017 - 09:15 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 34979 battles
  • 1,938
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    11-05-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 04 August 2017 - 07:58 AM, said:

Whut? The put the is7 buff in their announcement video of the test server yesterday.

I hole it doesnt make it though, with the engine buff its just better than the chinese meds and 260.

 

View Posttajj7, on 04 August 2017 - 08:59 AM, said:

 

IS7 was buffed, has 2400 HP on test, better aim time and now has 1200 HP. Still felt quite sluggish to me though, struggled to get it much past 40 on flat ground, Obj. 260 still seems to accelerate a lot better. 

 

----------------------------------------------

 

I don't think the changes have been cancelled they have just not made it into this test, so they are either next patch or might be next test version. 

 

Right, I see. I've been listening to some misinformed people then.

brumbarr #16 Posted 04 August 2017 - 09:37 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Posttajj7, on 04 August 2017 - 08:59 AM, said:

 

IS7 was buffed, has 2400 HP on test, better aim time and now has 1200 HP. Still felt quite sluggish to me though, struggled to get it much past 40 on flat ground, Obj. 260 still seems to accelerate a lot better. 

 

----------------------------------------------

 

I don't think the changes have been cancelled they have just not made it into this test, so they are either next patch or might be next test version. 

Is7 now has better gun handling than 113 and has better softstats than the leopard cause yolo


Edited by brumbarr, 04 August 2017 - 09:38 AM.


imendars #17 Posted 04 August 2017 - 09:41 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10983 battles
  • 1,086
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

View Posttajj7, on 04 August 2017 - 10:59 AM, said:

 

IS7 was buffed, has 2400 HP on test, better aim time and now has 1200 HP. Still felt quite sluggish to me though, struggled to get it much past 40 on flat ground, Obj. 260 still seems to accelerate a lot better. 

 

----------------------------------------------

 

I don't think the changes have been cancelled they have just not made it into this test, so they are either next patch or might be next test version. 

 

Object 260 terrain resistances on medium to soft ground are far better than is7. Plus Object 260 weight is lot smaller.

Therefore it stands to reason that Object 260 would accelerate lot faster.



Cobra6 #18 Posted 04 August 2017 - 09:42 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,760
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

Type59 is one of the most underwhelming T8 premium tanks in the game at the moment. The only thing it has going for it is turret armour.

 

It's sluggish, the gun aims *FAR* too long, the penetration is "meh".

 

Cobra 6



tajj7 #19 Posted 04 August 2017 - 10:15 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 25404 battles
  • 13,836
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    03-30-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 04 August 2017 - 08:37 AM, said:

Is7 now has better gun handling than 113 and has better softstats than the leopard cause yolo

 

Gun still felt very potato, I;d reckon the 113 is still the more reliable vehicle. 

 

View PostCobra6, on 04 August 2017 - 08:42 AM, said:

Type59 is one of the most underwhelming T8 premium tanks in the game at the moment. The only thing it has going for it is turret armour.

 

It's sluggish, the gun aims *FAR* too long, the penetration is "meh".

 

Cobra 6

 

FV4202 says hello, it's worse than a Type 59 and doesn't get limited MM. 



Cobra6 #20 Posted 04 August 2017 - 10:41 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 16332 battles
  • 15,760
  • [RGT] RGT
  • Member since:
    09-17-2010

View Posttajj7, on 04 August 2017 - 09:15 AM, said:

 

Gun still felt very potato, I;d reckon the 113 is still the more reliable vehicle. 

 

 

FV4202 says hello, it's worse than a Type 59 and doesn't get limited MM. 

 

FV4202 is getting buffed though, but I raise you: Chieftain/T95 says hello, even worse than the FV4202 is now. And that one *WON'T* get an actual buff.

 

Cobra 6






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users