Jump to content


Unbalance on gathered exp

Exp experience premium x-tier 10-tier löwe

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

PraefectusMors #1 Posted 04 August 2017 - 01:10 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 33756 battles
  • 7
  • [CGF] CGF
  • Member since:
    11-21-2014

I can understand the diffenrence between premium tanks and regular tanks about the earning experience on basic level, but somehow this situation what I just faced... not fun wg.

 

I'm waiting at if I can do nearly double dmg and a lot more kills with X-tier tank, I should get more experience than VIII-tier heavy. I made:
Dmg to tier-X: 769

Dmg to tier-IX: 1486 (2 kills)

Dmg to tier-VIII: 863 (2 kills)

 

Löwe: 1913 hp dmg.

 

Even if Löwe have done all that dmg to X-tier tanks, this is unfair situation which needs to be fixed.

 

EDIT: Attached images deleted 2017-08-08.


Edited by PraefectusMors, 08 August 2017 - 05:19 PM.


Tinbawx #2 Posted 04 August 2017 - 07:32 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 14381 battles
  • 1,086
  • [SNOB] SNOB
  • Member since:
    01-31-2011

There´s much more to the exp difference than Löwe being a premium tank.

 

First of all the Löwe was bottom tier in this game and did almost 2/3 of your damage.

Almost 2/3 of your damage was done from more than 300m away, the Löwe did all his damage from less than 300m away (You get a bonus for damaging tanks that are less than 200m away).

Since the Löwe did all his damage from less than 300m away, we can assume he spotted the majority if not all of his targets himself. The same cannot be said for you, you might or might not have. If you damage a target that is spotted by someone else, while you would not be able to spot it on your own, 50% of the credits and exp from that damage go to the spotter(s).

The Löwe also did 870 assistance damage, while you did none (unless I´m mistaken and the 490 number on your stats is assistance and not damaged blocked by armour).

 

To sum it up, I can see nothing unusual or unfair from the screenshots.

 

In case you didn´t know, you can find out what contributes to XP and credits here:

http://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Battle_Mechanics#Experience_and_Credits



Bearclaw #3 Posted 04 August 2017 - 08:40 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 18574 battles
  • 55
  • Member since:
    05-01-2011

I'm pretty sure the base xp dosen't increase just because it's a premium tank. the bonus xp for being a premium is added seperatly afterwards, just like the first victory bonus or a personal reserve.

 

But yeah, not spotting your own targets is probably the reason the Löwe got ahead of you



RamRaid90 #4 Posted 04 August 2017 - 08:46 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16886 battles
  • 3,734
  • [-AWF-] -AWF-
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

You camped at the redline farming useless damage, the Lowe did not.

 

Since you were damaging targets that were over 300meters away, it is a fsafe assumption that you were recieving only 50% of the exp for the damage you caused. Since the Lowe was not a coward hiding in a corner, he got 100% XP for all the damage he caused.

 

You recieved XP for 2186 damage caused (since 1,800 of it was likely spotted by someone else.)

The lowe recieved XP for 2350 damage caused (since half the XP for the damage he spotted was attributed to him)

 

Really this is not rocket science. Maybe try doing calculations before moaning on the forums.


Edited by RamRaid90, 04 August 2017 - 08:51 PM.


Jigabachi #5 Posted 04 August 2017 - 09:36 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17221 battles
  • 15,103
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011

Claiming that something is broken without even understanding it is rather stupid.

This can't be the first time you noticed that. The first thing I would do if I found something "weird" like that is reading the wiki again...

And if I wasn't sure about it, I would ASK about it. Not claim nonsense.

 


Edited by Jigabachi, 04 August 2017 - 09:37 PM.


PraefectusMors #6 Posted 05 August 2017 - 07:43 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 33756 battles
  • 7
  • [CGF] CGF
  • Member since:
    11-21-2014
Okay, thanks of your so polite and encouraging answers, RamRaid90 and Jigabachi.

RamRaid90 #7 Posted 05 August 2017 - 08:00 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16886 battles
  • 3,734
  • [-AWF-] -AWF-
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostPraefectusMors, on 05 August 2017 - 06:43 AM, said:

Okay, thanks of your so polite and encouraging answers, RamRaid90 and Jigabachi.

 

Maybe read the wiki next time.

 

If you come here with a polite question, instead of nonsense claims, you will get a better response.



PraefectusMors #8 Posted 05 August 2017 - 08:03 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 33756 battles
  • 7
  • [CGF] CGF
  • Member since:
    11-21-2014

RamRaid90, but obviously not from you. You just get still using impolite speaking but ask others to "behave"... please, look to the mirror, at least once.

 



jabster #9 Posted 05 August 2017 - 08:06 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 12004 battles
  • 18,116
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    12-30-2010

View PostPraefectusMors, on 05 August 2017 - 07:03 AM, said:

RamRaid90, but obviously not from you. You just get still using impolite speaking but ask others to "behave"... please, look to the mirror, at least once.

 

 

The problem is you started a thread 'demanding' that something is unfair and should be fixed when you didn't understand how exp. is rewarded in the first place. The two posters may have been a bit blunt but your OP didn't exactly have the most freindly tone did it so what did you expect?






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users