Jump to content


T30 does 3x a blow up.. aimbot?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
27 replies to this topic

sgtYester #1 Posted 04 August 2017 - 04:04 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 52222 battles
  • 1,412
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011

so, just got a battle where the enemy T30 does 3 times a blow up

 

really lucky rng or just a sad sad aimbot user?

 

http://wotreplays.co...tyester-m53_m55

 

ur thougts?



Effing_Drako #2 Posted 04 August 2017 - 04:05 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 25240 battles
  • 7,545
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    04-11-2011
Lucky RNG unless proven otherwise

THE_JACK_OF_HEARTS #3 Posted 04 August 2017 - 04:12 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 8971 battles
  • 864
  • [CMC3] CMC3
  • Member since:
    02-04-2015
maybe a sad sad poster, with no proof ?

Homer_J #4 Posted 04 August 2017 - 04:14 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27068 battles
  • 27,683
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
Aimbot or intimate knowledge of tanks, it's mostly luck either way.

JuliusCheddar #5 Posted 04 August 2017 - 04:15 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 27989 battles
  • 564
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014
150+mm guns really don't take much to blow people up

Homer_J #6 Posted 04 August 2017 - 04:20 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27068 battles
  • 27,683
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010
All 3 he killed have a 200 health ammo rack, they all have ammo racks where you would hit aiming with autoaim, T30 does 210 module damage.  So he got the equivalent of rolling an even number three times out of 5 penetrating shots.   Not even worth the tin foil.

MrEdweird #7 Posted 04 August 2017 - 04:30 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 18546 battles
  • 266
  • [CIRC2] CIRC2
  • Member since:
    08-19-2011
To be honest, even if he did get lucky with hitting their ammo racks, ammo rack explosions have like a 27% chance of happening, so using an aimbot does not guarantee ammo rack explosions. Was just incredible luck. Has to happen sometimes, statistically speaking.

Edited by MrEdweird, 04 August 2017 - 04:31 PM.


Swoopie #8 Posted 04 August 2017 - 04:40 PM

    Major

  • Beta Tester
  • 27994 battles
  • 2,526
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    01-15-2011

View PostHomer_J, on 04 August 2017 - 05:20 PM, said:

All 3 he killed have a 200 health ammo rack, they all have ammo racks where you would hit aiming with autoaim, T30 does 210 module damage.  So he got the equivalent of rolling an even number three times out of 5 penetrating shots.   Not even worth the tin foil.

 

He did pass the module saving roll tho which is an entirely different story (RNG wise) but yeah this is not worth wasting your tin foil people

Sfinski #9 Posted 04 August 2017 - 04:47 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29741 battles
  • 2,003
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Aimbot does not affect the chance to ammorack.

theSwedishTankDriver #10 Posted 04 August 2017 - 04:59 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23356 battles
  • 950
  • [KITTY] KITTY
  • Member since:
    03-04-2013

How does one player's result even remotely suggest he/she is using an aimbot?

 

View PostEffing_Drako, on 04 August 2017 - 04:05 PM, said:

Lucky RNG unless proven otherwise

 

Exactly.

 

What is wrong with all these [edited] accusing players for using illegal mods? Are they jealous or just *edited*?


 

Edited by Jbnn, 05 August 2017 - 06:49 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.


Homer_J #11 Posted 04 August 2017 - 05:07 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 27068 battles
  • 27,683
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostSfinski, on 04 August 2017 - 04:47 PM, said:

Aimbot does not affect the chance to ammorack.

 

But the theory which terrible players have is that only an aimbot can possibly know where to aim, even though there's really only like three standard layouts for tanks.

Sfinski #12 Posted 04 August 2017 - 05:24 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 29741 battles
  • 2,003
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013

View PostHomer_J, on 04 August 2017 - 05:07 PM, said:

 

But the theory which terrible players have is that only an aimbot can possibly know where to aim, even though there's really only like three standard layouts for tanks.

 

Indeed. I only know for certain where some tanks ammoracks are. Still been ammoracking people since day one. I only care if I can damage them. Ammorack is only extra rng.



Aikl #13 Posted 04 August 2017 - 05:39 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25141 battles
  • 4,005
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

Last time I checked, it was perfectly legal to use hitzone skins... but if you're shooting center of mass I'd guess that a T30 shell could reach the ammorack even from the rear.

 

Three ammoracks in a row isn't exactly equal to winning the grand lottery anyway.



ExclamationMark #14 Posted 04 August 2017 - 06:22 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013
HAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Schemezoid #15 Posted 04 August 2017 - 06:45 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 20124 battles
  • 2,710
  • Member since:
    11-29-2013
Big gun Big boom

RockyRoller #16 Posted 04 August 2017 - 08:00 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28273 battles
  • 1,134
  • [NR-NS] NR-NS
  • Member since:
    06-15-2016

View PostMrEdweird, on 04 August 2017 - 03:30 PM, said:

To be honest, even if he did get lucky with hitting their ammo racks, ammo rack explosions have like a 27% chance of happening, so using an aimbot does not guarantee ammo rack explosions. Was just incredible luck. Has to happen sometimes, statistically speaking.

 

I believe WG has increased that % (based on seeing far too many ammo racks) to near 50/50 if you skilled up everything to do mod damage and your opponent has zero defences. Is that fair on everyone, you decide, but for me it isn't.

Slyspy #17 Posted 04 August 2017 - 08:04 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 14169 battles
  • 16,327
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-07-2011

View PostRockyRoller, on 04 August 2017 - 08:00 PM, said:

 

I believe WG has increased that % (based on seeing far too many ammo racks) to near 50/50 if you skilled up everything to do mod damage and your opponent has zero defences. Is that fair on everyone, you decide, but for me it isn't.

 

You are objecting to actions supposedly taken by WG based solely on a scenario which you have made up. Genius. 

jimbobjammybob #18 Posted 04 August 2017 - 08:15 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 618 battles
  • 198
  • [TH1NK] TH1NK
  • Member since:
    12-28-2015

I played T67 yesterday and fired a shot into a T-34 and it set on fire and died. my very next shot set an SU-85 on fire and it died. wohooo!!!

 

I instantly went out and bought a £10 lottery ticket which ended up not being a winner, the worst thing though is that I stood in dog poo on the way back from the shop and didn't notice until I had walked it all through the hall carpet. Almost half an hour scrubbing  some wunkers dog muck of my carpet.

 

WOT RNG ruined my life!

 

 



qpranger #19 Posted 04 August 2017 - 08:27 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 30715 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013
You only get such lucky shot sequences if you worship the devil. Don't go down that route, it is not worth it.

Spurtung #20 Posted 04 August 2017 - 10:10 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 60081 battles
  • 5,477
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PosttheSwedishTankDriver, on 04 August 2017 - 06:00 PM, said:

Are they jealous or just *edited*?

Both, but *edited* above all.


Edited by Jbnn, 05 August 2017 - 06:49 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users