Jump to content


New WG rating, any info?


  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

brumbarr #1 Posted 06 August 2017 - 01:07 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012
So apperently WG made a new rating for players, is there any information about it? Is it already on the test server? 

Dr_ownape #2 Posted 06 August 2017 - 02:58 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 41848 battles
  • 5,386
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013
Oh no, not another worthless one?

hjorte #3 Posted 06 August 2017 - 05:11 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 14022 battles
  • 143
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014
Source?

JocMeister #4 Posted 06 August 2017 - 05:22 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21731 battles
  • 1,853
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View PostDrownape, on 06 August 2017 - 02:58 PM, said:

Oh no, not another worthless one?

 

Cant be any worse than wn8.

brumbarr #5 Posted 06 August 2017 - 05:29 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostJocMeister, on 06 August 2017 - 05:22 PM, said:

 

Cant be any worse than wn8.

 

What would you call PR, WN7,effieciency  then?

Boris_Radijacija_86 #6 Posted 06 August 2017 - 05:31 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 4724 battles
  • 98
  • [V0LV0] V0LV0
  • Member since:
    06-08-2017
Excellent. Now i can suck in new rating as well.

ExclamationMark #7 Posted 06 August 2017 - 05:35 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 16679 battles
  • 3,727
  • Member since:
    04-12-2013
CAN I PAD IT?

NUKLEAR_SLUG #8 Posted 06 August 2017 - 08:01 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27500 battles
  • 1,949
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
WG implementing Rush rating?

Browarszky #9 Posted 06 August 2017 - 08:24 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 15922 battles
  • 3,505
  • [I-S-L] I-S-L
  • Member since:
    12-03-2013

 

 

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 06 August 2017 - 07:01 PM, said:

 WG implementing Rush rating?

 

What is it? The YOLO Quotient?


Edited by Browarszky, 06 August 2017 - 08:25 PM.


NUKLEAR_SLUG #10 Posted 06 August 2017 - 08:28 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 27500 battles
  • 1,949
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
It rates your performance based on Slepnirs/minute.

sgtYester #11 Posted 06 August 2017 - 08:41 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53375 battles
  • 1,516
  • [RANGF] RANGF
  • Member since:
    04-10-2011

View PostJocMeister, on 06 August 2017 - 05:22 PM, said:

 

Cant be any worse than wn8.

 

this is WG we are talking about.

 

they can and they WILL



JocMeister #12 Posted 06 August 2017 - 08:46 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 21731 battles
  • 1,853
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    08-03-2015

View Postbrumbarr, on 06 August 2017 - 05:29 PM, said:

 

What would you call PR, WN7,effieciency  then?

 

Wut? What does that have to do with anything? Only PR is a WG construct and right now its not any worse than wn8 which is meaningless since the last update.

 

 



HundeWurst #13 Posted 06 August 2017 - 09:03 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 67720 battles
  • 4,275
  • [FAME] FAME
  • Member since:
    02-06-2012

View PostBrowarszky, on 06 August 2017 - 08:24 PM, said:

 

 

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 06 August 2017 - 07:01 PM, said:

 WG implementing Rush rating?

 

What is it? The YOLO Quotient?

Slipnir move bois SLEIPNIR!



shishx_the_animal #14 Posted 07 August 2017 - 09:07 AM

    Colonel

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 30672 battles
  • 3,861
  • [FAIME] FAIME
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013

View PostExclamationMark, on 06 August 2017 - 04:35 PM, said:

CAN I PAD IT?

 

Everything can be padded if you're brave enough. :hiding:

IncandescentGerbil #15 Posted 07 August 2017 - 09:56 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 35666 battles
  • 1,443
  • Member since:
    11-24-2015
Apparently it is based on gold spam / minute. The more money you give WG, the higher your rating.

shishx_the_animal #16 Posted 07 August 2017 - 10:02 AM

    Colonel

  • WGL PRO Player
  • 30672 battles
  • 3,861
  • [FAIME] FAIME
  • Member since:
    04-06-2013

View PostIncandescentGerbil, on 07 August 2017 - 08:56 AM, said:

Apparently it is based on gold spam / minute. The more money you give WG, the higher your rating.

 

Then I'm your God since I have a weekly Fort Knox subscription and a private VIP ingame Hangar. There are girls with minimum clothing walking and loading premium ammo on my tanks. I noticed I spend more time in the garage than on the battlefield... weird.

Edited by shishx_the_animal, 07 August 2017 - 10:03 AM.


Aikl #17 Posted 07 August 2017 - 10:25 AM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 25167 battles
  • 4,253
  • [-MM] -MM
  • Member since:
    04-13-2011

View PostDrownape, on 06 August 2017 - 01:58 PM, said:

Oh no, not another worthless one?

 

Not if they made a ranking that would create battles with only basecampers, climbers and "Maus/Type 5/Defender is balanced" players. Heck, it'd be a dream come true for them - and us! Thirty TDs on Malinovka? Check. Thirty Defenders on Mittengard? Check. Thirty climbers on Mountain Pass? Check. :D



Neno #18 Posted 07 August 2017 - 10:29 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 36473 battles
  • 27
  • [TRVST] TRVST
  • Member since:
    05-24-2011
Service Record -->> Hall of Fame ?? you mean that ???

FireflyDivision #19 Posted 07 August 2017 - 11:01 AM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 23773 battles
  • 3,792
  • [L-REM] L-REM
  • Member since:
    04-18-2011

View PostNUKLEAR_SLUG, on 06 August 2017 - 08:01 PM, said:

WG implementing Rush rating?

 

Come on... dont you know that that's outdated?? It's all about the Absolute Victory Force now...

brumbarr #20 Posted 07 August 2017 - 11:02 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View PostNeno, on 07 August 2017 - 10:29 AM, said:

Service Record -->> Hall of Fame ?? you mean that ???

Yes! Is it on the test server?






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users