Jump to content


"we didn't think the maus buff would make it OP, so we're nerfing it now!" - wg


  • Please log in to reply
38 replies to this topic

HunterXHunter8 #1 Posted 09 August 2017 - 07:13 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 33424 battles
  • 948
  • Member since:
    04-27-2013

https://www.youtube....h?v=lJUMnEhLBfM

 

lmao do these guys even play their own game?? doesnt seem like it 



Beltalowda #2 Posted 09 August 2017 - 07:16 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 62632 battles
  • 809
  • Member since:
    03-02-2011
They are laughing to our faces, that's all. It is some kind of twisted sense of humor.

Homer_J #3 Posted 09 August 2017 - 07:43 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29215 battles
  • 30,671
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostHunterXHunter8, on 09 August 2017 - 07:13 PM, said:

 

lmao do these guys even play their own game?? doesnt seem like it 

 

Play the game or not they certainly didn't listen.



brumbarr #4 Posted 09 August 2017 - 07:44 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012
Its not like after the first round of buffs everyone said it was totaly OP...
No, WG listened to feedback and buffed it even more! CT is so usefull...

gunslingerXXX #5 Posted 09 August 2017 - 08:11 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 11211 battles
  • 2,117
  • [GUNSL] GUNSL
  • Member since:
    11-16-2014
Just another way to make money. Make player speedgrind to OP tank, when income drops, nerf tank and make another OP (or introduce new OP line). And repeat as long as the idiots go for it.

Envoy_MT #6 Posted 09 August 2017 - 09:03 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38555 battles
  • 488
  • [ABI] ABI
  • Member since:
    09-17-2013
*Edited

Edited by Nohe21, 10 August 2017 - 10:00 AM.
*This post has been edited by the moderation team due to not being constructive.


Y_O_L_0 #7 Posted 09 August 2017 - 09:06 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19898 battles
  • 907
  • [FUSED] FUSED
  • Member since:
    12-27-2012
WarGaming is listening to player feedback, but they only listen to the Russian players.

HaZardeur #8 Posted 09 August 2017 - 09:13 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Beta Tester
  • 34067 battles
  • 1,225
  • Member since:
    08-14-2010

View PostgunslingerXXX, on 09 August 2017 - 08:11 PM, said:

Just another way to make money. Make player speedgrind to OP tank, when income drops, nerf tank and make another OP (or introduce new OP line). And repeat as long as the idiots go for it.

 

WG business model since 2011

CptBarney #9 Posted 09 August 2017 - 09:27 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 18996 battles
  • 3,983
  • [-WR--] -WR--
  • Member since:
    12-09-2013

View PostHaZardeur, on 09 August 2017 - 08:13 PM, said:

 

WG business model since 2011

 

Global buisness model since the first business created and founded.



leggasiini #10 Posted 09 August 2017 - 09:48 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14964 battles
  • 6,216
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

Imo the Type 5 part was even more stupid. People literally conplain about derp gun yet they act like the traverse speed is the actual problem. Cute, just a way to avoid nerfing derp gun so it can stay as p2w.

 

Slava: Hey look, people complain about Type 5 Heavy.

 

Murazor: Whats wrong with it? We just buffed it.

 

Slava: Apparently the new derp gun makes it broken and overpowered and the premium HE shell is undoubtly pay2win. What should we do?

 

Murazor: Lets see...Yeah, I think we should nerf it.

 

Slava: But how?

 

Murazor: I know! Instead of touching the derp gun, lets nerf the traverse speed instead and give it weakspots that are still irrelevant so people still spam gold at it! We can still act like we nerfed it!

 

Slava: And lets not nerf the derp gun nor buff the 14cm gun to make sure everyone uses derp gun and keep spamming gold HE so we get even more money! 

 

Murazor: Fantastic! Lets implement this to supertest right away!

 

shakes hands

 


Edited by leggasiini, 10 August 2017 - 09:44 AM.


qpranger #11 Posted 09 August 2017 - 09:53 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33371 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View Postleggasiini, on 09 August 2017 - 10:48 PM, said:

Imo the Type 5 part was even more stupid. People literally conplain about derp gun yet they act like the traverse speed is the actual problem. Cute, just a way to avoid nerfing derp gun so it can stay as p2w.

 

Slava: Hey look, people complain about Type 5 Heavy.

 

Murazor: Whats wrong with it? We just buffed it.

 

Slava: Apparently the new derp gun makes it broken and overpowered and the premium HE shell is undoubtly pay2win. What should we do?

 

Murazor: Lets see...Yeah, I think we should nerf it.

 

Slava: But how?

 

Murazor: I know! Instead of touching the derp gun, lets nerf the traverse speed instead and give it weakspot that are still irrelevant so people still spam gold at it! We can still act like we nerfed it!

 

Slava: And people still will use only derp gun because its only viable gun, keep spamming gold HE so we get even more money! 

 

Murazor: Fantastic! Lets implement this to supertest right away!

 

shakes hands

 

 

Reportet for disclosing confidential company conversation.

leggasiini #12 Posted 09 August 2017 - 10:52 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 14964 battles
  • 6,216
  • [-GLO-] -GLO-
  • Member since:
    12-01-2012

View Postqpranger, on 09 August 2017 - 10:53 PM, said:

 

Reportet for disclosing confidential company conversation.

 

So you were spying me when I was spying WG? You bloody hamster.

ZlatanArKung #13 Posted 09 August 2017 - 11:11 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 1529 battles
  • 5,112
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

View Postleggasiini, on 09 August 2017 - 09:48 PM, said:

Imo the Type 5 part was even more stupid. People literally conplain about derp gun yet they act like the traverse speed is the actual problem. Cute, just a way to avoid nerfing derp gun so it can stay as p2w.

 

Slava: Hey look, people complain about Type 5 Heavy.

 

Murazor: Whats wrong with it? We just buffed it.

 

Slava: Apparently the new derp gun makes it broken and overpowered and the premium HE shell is undoubtly pay2win. What should we do?

 

Murazor: Lets see...Yeah, I think we should nerf it.

 

Slava: But how?

 

Murazor: I know! Instead of touching the derp gun, lets nerf the traverse speed instead and give it weakspot that are still irrelevant so people still spam gold at it! We can still act like we nerfed it!

 

Slava: And people will still use the derp gun and keep spamming gold HE so we get even more money! 

 

Murazor: Fantastic! Lets implement this to supertest right away!

 

shakes hands

 

 

I think it is kind of forbidden to spy and release company secrets and conversations gotten from bugging.



qpranger #14 Posted 09 August 2017 - 11:48 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 33371 battles
  • 5,061
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    12-25-2013

View Postleggasiini, on 09 August 2017 - 11:52 PM, said:

 

So you were spying me when I was spying WG? You bloody hamster.

 

I could not help it, I was in the cage in the corner of the room.

It is not like I get to choose which room I am kept in. Sheesh.



WindSplitter1 #15 Posted 09 August 2017 - 11:55 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 16303 battles
  • 2,564
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

The only part I didn't like was the one concerning the Grille 15...

 

I don't think the traverse on the Type 5 was the issue but the lack of frontal weak spots, which the video clearly shows they have them now, provided these will go live, and the premium shell doing more damage than the standard round. Reversing them wouldn't solve the issue, as others have suggested, but the gun could still stay in the game, in my opinion, if the ammunition is addressed.



Johann_von_Goethe #16 Posted 10 August 2017 - 01:26 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 8260 battles
  • 62
  • [DSNL] DSNL
  • Member since:
    01-27-2013
WG sucks in implementing improvements. They never learned to listen to what customers want.

Plasma_Fire #17 Posted 10 August 2017 - 01:40 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 19581 battles
  • 722
  • Member since:
    08-13-2011

The Maus is a classic example of WG not really having a clue what they are doing.

Whiners whine about the Maus being OP so they lower its DPM AND its HP because they dont want it to deliver so much damage nor do they want it to survive as long in the game.

 

The M48 has a massive cupola, it does in real life. But in the game the American tree isnt meant to be the games Ultra Violent mode so they decide to make the tank not follow its real life design thus making it harder to damage so it will last longer in the games.

 

The AMX 30 gets unrealistic gun mantle and a better DPM (or damage per second) The French tree is designed to be the games Not to rough mode so it can deliver and take the damage and its normal, perfectly normal...

 

This game has difficultly levels. it just doesnt say it on the tin. The Maus is in the Nightmare game mode and they will nerf the living f**k out of it because they dont want it to dominate games. It just doesnt look good an AMX will kill a Maus easily inside of a minute. Long before a Maus can deliver enough damage to kill an AMX.

 

Still paying for this game?



overcorpse #18 Posted 10 August 2017 - 02:33 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 21260 battles
  • 290
  • [BRTD] BRTD
  • Member since:
    10-16-2011

View PostWindSplitter1, on 09 August 2017 - 11:55 PM, said:

The only part I didn't like was the one concerning the Grille 15...

 

I don't think the traverse on the Type 5 was the issue but the lack of frontal weak spots, which the video clearly shows they have them now, provided these will go live, and the premium shell doing more damage than the standard round. Reversing them wouldn't solve the issue, as others have suggested, but the gun could still stay in the game, in my opinion, if the ammunition is addressed.

I am up for that as long as mediums and  their 330 mm Cheat ammo is nerfed.Or is it just heavies that are supposed to get nerfed?


Edited by overcorpse, 10 August 2017 - 02:35 AM.


StaryWilk #19 Posted 10 August 2017 - 03:30 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 16806 battles
  • 35
  • [WFTTE] WFTTE
  • Member since:
    11-14-2011

Need this guy

 


Edited by StaryWilk, 10 August 2017 - 03:44 AM.


TankkiPoju #20 Posted 10 August 2017 - 06:32 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 20807 battles
  • 6,305
  • [-PJ-] -PJ-
  • Member since:
    05-20-2011

If only there was a way to test buffs and nerfs before hand... Like maybe some kind of test server?

 

Hmm hmmm.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users