Jump to content


9.20 Chinese medium tanks.


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

Zodiac1960s #1 Posted 10 August 2017 - 09:57 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38465 battles
  • 938
  • [VOMIT] VOMIT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011

What ever happened to buffs for the Type 59, T-34-3 and 59 Patton?  

 

I would love to see a better engine, way to sluggish I think. 



lord_chipmonk #2 Posted 10 August 2017 - 09:58 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 33952 battles
  • 10,251
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012
Not coming this patch. Not sure if they've been shelved or put on hold until later. 

Zodiac1960s #3 Posted 10 August 2017 - 10:05 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38465 battles
  • 938
  • [VOMIT] VOMIT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011
I figured.  Hope it means the buffs where not good enough yet.

And the hd model for the T-34-3 better look good after all these years.  Poor neglected machine.

WindSplitter1 #4 Posted 10 August 2017 - 10:45 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 15937 battles
  • 2,560
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostBlind_Hate, on 10 August 2017 - 09:05 PM, said:

I figured. Hope it means the buffs where not good enough yet.

And the hd model for the T-34-3 better look good after all these years. Poor neglected machine.

 

Not to mention how expensive it is for a Tier VIII medium. Gunhandling could use some more love too...

scorpiontank1 #5 Posted 11 August 2017 - 04:56 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 26325 battles
  • 837
  • [ARG] ARG
  • Member since:
    10-12-2012
WG decided these buffs would break the game and thus they rejected it 

Edited by scorpiontank1, 11 August 2017 - 04:56 AM.


imendars #6 Posted 11 August 2017 - 06:57 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10983 battles
  • 1,086
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

Just cause they are not in public test yet doesn't mean they wont come.

Perhaps in next public test iteration?

This is a big patch... It would stand to reason that they have not put everything in first 2 iterations.

Just saying.



Sir_Bad #7 Posted 11 August 2017 - 08:48 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Player
  • 45091 battles
  • 494
  • Member since:
    10-08-2011

View PostWindSplitter1, on 10 August 2017 - 09:45 PM, said:

 

Not to mention how expensive it is for a Tier VIII medium. Gunhandling could use some more love too...

 

Though the buffs are greatly appreciated, it is a very decent tank even without them. Also it still makes gud credits when running full heat. You just have to stop the gun from wanting to kill moles all the time.

Spurtung #8 Posted 11 August 2017 - 09:06 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63618 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostBlind_Hate, on 10 August 2017 - 11:05 PM, said:

I figured. Hope it means the buffs where not good enough yet.

From what I read, they were too good and that's why they're not coming yet.



Spurtung #9 Posted 11 August 2017 - 09:07 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63618 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postimendars, on 11 August 2017 - 07:57 AM, said:

This is a big patch... It would stand to reason that they have not put everything in first 2 iterations.

Just saying.

Bigger than new MM, tier 9 and 10 LTs and arty changes, all at once?


Edited by Spurtung, 11 August 2017 - 09:07 AM.


imendars #10 Posted 11 August 2017 - 09:10 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10983 battles
  • 1,086
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

View PostSpurtung, on 11 August 2017 - 11:07 AM, said:

Bigger than new MM, tier 9 and 10 LTs and arty changes, all at once?

 

Dont you dare question my memory.

 

View PostSpurtung, on 11 August 2017 - 11:06 AM, said:

From what I read, they were too good and that's why they're not coming yet.

 

Source?



DuncaN_101 #11 Posted 11 August 2017 - 09:20 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 53219 battles
  • 1,892
  • [-B-C-] -B-C-
  • Member since:
    07-29-2011

View PostSir_Bad, on 11 August 2017 - 08:48 AM, said:

 

Though the buffs are greatly appreciated, it is a very decent tank even without them. Also it still makes gud credits when running full heat. You just have to stop the gun from wanting to kill moles all the time.

But those moles are freaking pesky tho 



Spurtung #12 Posted 11 August 2017 - 09:24 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63618 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postimendars, on 11 August 2017 - 10:10 AM, said:

View PostSpurtung, on 11 August 2017 - 11:06 AM, said:

From what I read, they were too good and that's why they're not coming yet.

 

Source?

Tried to find it again, no success.



imendars #13 Posted 11 August 2017 - 09:38 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10983 battles
  • 1,086
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

View PostSpurtung, on 11 August 2017 - 11:24 AM, said:

Tried to find it again, no success.

 

Hmm.

Well, the good news is it seems WG agrees with me that Foch B is well balanced cause that one was not scrapped.

* good news for me...

 

Or perhaps that was a WG trolling  to get more people buy those few prem tanks. :trollface:



brumbarr #14 Posted 11 August 2017 - 10:09 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 38626 battles
  • 6,326
  • Member since:
    07-30-2012

View Postimendars, on 11 August 2017 - 09:38 AM, said:

 

Hmm.

Well, the good news is it seems WG agrees with me that Foch B is well balanced cause that one was not scrapped.

* good news for me...

 

Or perhaps that was a WG trolling  to get more people buy those few prem tanks. :trollface:

Ah, just like WG buffed the maus in test because it was UP...



imendars #15 Posted 11 August 2017 - 10:23 AM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 10983 battles
  • 1,086
  • Member since:
    04-17-2014

View Postbrumbarr, on 11 August 2017 - 12:09 PM, said:

Ah, just like WG buffed the maus in test because it was UP...

 

Well, if i will play Foch B a lot, they might just buff it again... :trollface:

WindSplitter1 #16 Posted 11 August 2017 - 06:19 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 15937 battles
  • 2,560
  • [ORDEM] ORDEM
  • Member since:
    02-07-2016

View PostSir_Bad, on 11 August 2017 - 07:48 AM, said:

 

Though the buffs are greatly appreciated, it is a very decent tank even without them. Also it still makes gud credits when running full heat. You just have to stop the gun from wanting to kill moles all the time.

 

Now this I gotta see...



stanislavek1 #17 Posted 11 August 2017 - 08:54 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 9489 battles
  • 744
  • [CECH] CECH
  • Member since:
    10-23-2013

View Postimendars, on 11 August 2017 - 06:57 AM, said:

Just cause they are not in public test yet doesn't mean they wont come.

Perhaps in next public test iteration?

This is a big patch... It would stand to reason that they have not put everything in first 2 iterations.

Just saying.

 

So you think there is still chance that T-34-3 will get HD in 9.20? I am not sure, not even screenshots of HD model were presented, only possible armor changes.

Edited by stanislavek1, 11 August 2017 - 08:55 PM.


Derethim #18 Posted 12 August 2017 - 01:30 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 17499 battles
  • 1,882
  • Member since:
    04-03-2012

Chinese tanks in general suck... nobody plays them, because of the crippling gun DP, so it's probably low-priority for WG.

Who would play a reskin of Russian tanks with worse gun dp?



Zodiac1960s #19 Posted 12 August 2017 - 11:29 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 38465 battles
  • 938
  • [VOMIT] VOMIT
  • Member since:
    03-27-2011

View PostDerethim, on 12 August 2017 - 12:30 AM, said:

Chinese tanks in general suck... nobody plays them, because of the crippling gun DP, so it's probably low-priority for WG.

Who would play a reskin of Russian tanks with worse gun dp?

You clearly don't play them yourself..  And this is one giant reason why we want buffs and changes.  Lately Wargaming tries to change the gameplay from tanks similar to each other.  Well continue that.  Just keep the balance in check. 



Spurtung #20 Posted 12 August 2017 - 11:33 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 63618 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Poststanislavek1, on 11 August 2017 - 09:54 PM, said:

 

So you think there is still chance that T-34-3 will get HD in 9.20? I am not sure, not even screenshots of HD model were presented, only possible armor changes.

 

It won't.

 

Block Quote

 Reworked the following vehicles to HD-quality

Vehicles:

  1. SU-5
  2. SU-14-1
  3. Bat.-Châtillon 25 t
  4. M12
  5. M5A1 Stuart
  6. Pz.Kpfw. 38H 735 (f)
  7. Pz.Kpfw. IV Ausf. D
  8. VK 30.01 (D)
  9. T69
  10. Matilda Black Prince
  11. Churchill III
  12. T-44-85

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users