Jump to content


A question for WG moderators Cynd3r , Ph3lan , Mr Conway ...


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

Synopsis0 #1 Posted 11 August 2017 - 06:54 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38175 battles
  • 216
  • Member since:
    11-23-2012

So the question will be about 2 tanks future in the new patch...

 

WG decided to buff a bit tier 8  T44 and t54 first prototype which is perfectly normal and its a good decision . In the curent state of the game they both has similar caracteristics with minor changes but almoust are the same and they need some buff to be competitive.Those buff are wellcome even if the prototype its a premium tank so good work so far.

 

Wg decided to buff a bit tier 9  t54  and its fine , the tank was too old and become outdated with new game changes and some buff needed to be competitive again but...  t54 and t55a has the same caracteristics like t44 and t54first prototype with minor changes so why they dont add to list the t55a to ? Dont mention that the t55a its a reward tank for personal mission .

 

Wg decided to buff a bit tier 10 is7 and its a good decision too but.... is 7 and the obj 260 are again the same with minor changes . Both are not competitive in the curent stage of the game.

 

So this 2 reward tanks for personal missions T55a and Obj260 both are similar with those 2 a bit outdated tanks and they will remain in the shadow. What the point doing and grinding lines and hard work to finish the personal missions if as reward you will get those tanks . Why avarage players should bother to have those tanks when they can play with T54 and Is7 which would be better then those tanks ?

O yes they are premiums and good for crew training and not so good for credit grinding , are good for playing tier 9 and 10 and not lose so many credits beacouse not all are unicums so far as i know , so yes many ppl lose credits in tier 9 and 10 games. I don`t see reason for complaining either from players that Wg will buff this 2 premium tanks beacouse they are reward for personal mission so everybody who puts a bit effort will have it , its not a pay for win either .You finish the presonal mission you have two similar tanks as it was in the past but the advantage is they are premiums and crew trainers and credit friendly and its worth strugglin with grinding the personal mission to get them . After update you will get practicly an inferior  t55a and a inferior is7 ? 

 

Whats the logic behind this ? Personal mission lose their meaning or why they are almoust similar on paper but not for buff ?

 

Or they just completly forgot about t55a and obj260 beacouse those tanks are played by not avarage players but unicums and good players and on the statistics they look better and they don`t need changes ?

 

The only answer i think its that beacouse if you look at the statics , the t54 and the is7 are played by all players , and when you look at the statics of T55a a and obj260 so ... i could bet who play with those tanks....

 

So be kind moderators and can you answer for this question why they dont do the same with this two tanks t55a and obj260 ?

 

Keep up the good work and thanks for this great game...


Edited by Synopsis0, 11 August 2017 - 06:55 AM.


Dr_ownape #2 Posted 11 August 2017 - 07:21 AM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 43338 battles
  • 5,480
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013
how would the mods know?  their job is to moderate content posted on here. if you look at the top there is an ideal place to ask these questions.

wsatnutter #3 Posted 11 August 2017 - 08:53 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Beta Tester
  • 24945 battles
  • 7,572
  • [WSAT] WSAT
  • Member since:
    08-25-2010
What's is written above 

Geno1isme #4 Posted 11 August 2017 - 09:28 AM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 42587 battles
  • 7,804
  • [TRYIT] TRYIT
  • Member since:
    09-03-2013
At least for the T-55A there is the argument that it will keep the single gun with good gun-handling and DPM, while with the new T-54 people have to pick one aspect in favor of the other. And armor-wise it already has the advantage of only having one hatch on the turret vs. the two hatches on the T-54. So personally I think it's actually a good move to not copy+paste the T-54 changes on to the T-55A and make them more diverse.

Dragonlordcv #5 Posted 11 August 2017 - 09:45 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 23980 battles
  • 861
  • Member since:
    03-10-2012
Not even those who make changes would be able to answer your questions... They do not play the game. They just wake up in the morning and think  "Oh Edited i have to find an excuse for my salary - guess i haven't touch that pixel with gun eh what if i change this numbers.... what is HEAT again..... Edited  it i will use a number generator and do it in 2 minutes and go for coffee."

Edited by Asklepi0s, 11 August 2017 - 10:05 AM.
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks


GekkoGordon #6 Posted 11 August 2017 - 09:54 AM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 4097 battles
  • 275
  • [-VUK-] -VUK-
  • Member since:
    04-17-2012
Cider, phallus and FV4004 Conway best t9 td

Balc0ra #7 Posted 11 August 2017 - 11:55 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 66256 battles
  • 16,237
  • [WALL] WALL
  • Member since:
    07-10-2012

T-55A is a German premium. Not a Russian one. If it was I suspect they would do something to it. That said, the T-54 changes was to give each gun a unique role. One for brawling, and one for long range support. As it was down to pen and ROF atm more so then anything on both. And most went for ROF. Thus the T-55A is a hybrid if you will in the next patch. One that can do both. Thus setting their styles apart. Nothing more. I see no reason to make the T-55A a pure support, or pure sniper tbh by changing his gun to.

 

And the T-55A and the other PM reward tanks are looked at as normal tanks. Not premiums. And can be nerfed or buffed as needed.

 

View PostDrownape, on 11 August 2017 - 07:21 AM, said:

how would the mods know?  their job is to moderate content posted on here. if you look at the top there is an ideal place to ask these questions.

 

Well some like Conway is more then just a forum "mod".  As Conway was the one that posted images and gave reasons for the British TD buffs on super test when we asked about it... or leaked it.  As he was just about to post the news about it on the portals with images. And thus has enough intel given to him, to give a detailed enough reply at times.


Edited by Balc0ra, 11 August 2017 - 11:56 AM.


Dr_ownape #8 Posted 11 August 2017 - 12:52 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 43338 battles
  • 5,480
  • [IDEAL] IDEAL
  • Member since:
    03-27-2013

View PostBalc0ra, on 11 August 2017 - 10:55 AM, said:

T-55A is a German premium. Not a Russian one. If it was I suspect they would do something to it. That said, the T-54 changes was to give each gun a unique role. One for brawling, and one for long range support. As it was down to pen and ROF atm more so then anything on both. And most went for ROF. Thus the T-55A is a hybrid if you will in the next patch. One that can do both. Thus setting their styles apart. Nothing more. I see no reason to make the T-55A a pure support, or pure sniper tbh by changing his gun to.

 

And the T-55A and the other PM reward tanks are looked at as normal tanks. Not premiums. And can be nerfed or buffed as needed.

 

 

Well some like Conway is more then just a forum "mod".  As Conway was the one that posted images and gave reasons for the British TD buffs on super test when we asked about it... or leaked it.  As he was just about to post the news about it on the portals with images. And thus has enough intel given to him, to give a detailed enough reply at times.

 

Well yes he is but the point i was making was there is a dedicated thread at the top to ask questions of the people that are most likely to know.

 

I suspect that Mr C and others just go ask someone if they can release the info. BUT asking Qs of "mods" in general is futile.



Synopsis0 #9 Posted 11 August 2017 - 06:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38175 battles
  • 216
  • Member since:
    11-23-2012

View PostDrownape, on 11 August 2017 - 11:52 AM, said:

 

Well yes he is but the point i was making was there is a dedicated thread at the top to ask questions of the people that are most likely to know.

 

I suspect that Mr C and others just go ask someone if they can release the info. BUT asking Qs of "mods" in general is futile.

 

Well it was just a simple question with my opinion so doesnt need to be up there , and i am just a simple player who cares a bit. I am happy with a simple answer like.... dude you are to stupid and dont bother ..... or dude we have the intel but we dont answer to a simple minded dude.... or we don`t read it .. but it was great ... I still will be happy and i will keep playing the game :)

Edited by Synopsis0, 11 August 2017 - 06:48 PM.


unhappy_bunny #10 Posted 11 August 2017 - 07:30 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18099 battles
  • 2,670
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012
2 separate threads about the same thing OP, why? 

Homer_J #11 Posted 11 August 2017 - 07:34 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28692 battles
  • 29,991
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostDrownape, on 11 August 2017 - 07:21 AM, said:

how would the mods know?  their job is to moderate content posted on here. if you look at the top there is an ideal place to ask these questions.

 

The WG staff he aimed the question at aren't even moderators so clearly just a lack of knowledge from the OP.

 

As for the question, they didn't buff a whole bunch of other tanks either, can't expect everything in one patch.



Synopsis0 #12 Posted 11 August 2017 - 07:43 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38175 battles
  • 216
  • Member since:
    11-23-2012

You can call them moderators, wg stuff , they are open minded ppl . One topic was for us , this topic is for them...moking ppl it is verry easy thinking its dificult....

 



unhappy_bunny #13 Posted 11 August 2017 - 07:49 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18099 battles
  • 2,670
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

 

so the moderators wouldn't have read your first post?  

and i wasn't mocking you, i was asking a question. 

 

and on your other post, you were told that 1 is German, the other Russian, so it still begs the question : Why you need to keep asking?



Synopsis0 #14 Posted 11 August 2017 - 07:55 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 38175 battles
  • 216
  • Member since:
    11-23-2012
Becouse i can and its a forum , can you feel me ? And read it well the other the issue isnt the nationality of thanks.

unhappy_bunny #15 Posted 11 August 2017 - 09:40 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 18099 battles
  • 2,670
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012

View PostSynopsis0, on 11 August 2017 - 07:55 PM, said:

Becouse i can and its a forum , can you feel me ? And read it well the other the issue isnt the nationality of thanks.

Why would I want to feel you? 

 

But if they are of different nations, then there is no issue surely? Why would nerffing  or buffing 1 affect the other? Different tech-trees. different tanks. 

Even if they were the same base model, 2 different countries are going to apply different upgrades to each other, thus a change to one doesn't necessitate a change to the other.



an0ther #16 Posted 11 August 2017 - 10:10 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 32727 battles
  • 1,776
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    06-15-2011
I don't think they're moderators

Homer_J #17 Posted 12 August 2017 - 06:40 AM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 28692 battles
  • 29,991
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostSynopsis0, on 11 August 2017 - 07:43 PM, said:

One topic was for us , this topic is for them...

 

 

I see, we mere mortals are not fit to partake in the same thread as the all powerful WG staff moderator beings.


Edited by Homer_J, 12 August 2017 - 06:40 AM.


Gremlin182 #18 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:01 AM

    General

  • Player
  • 48698 battles
  • 8,145
  • Member since:
    04-18-2012

Im getting close to the T55A so any potential buffs to that would be of interest.

I'm mostly hoping thet when the Foch 155 becomes a special tank they make it a proper premium in all respects.

 

As I keep telling them there is NO decent french premium TD that can be used for crew training and credit grinding and while a tier 10 probably isn't ideal for credit grinding its way better than a tier 3 like the Pak 40 So please don't leave it with typical tier 10 repair costs.

Its that or finally stop making endless premiums for other parts of the game so at least the French have one.

Come on you can spare the time other nations are drowning in premiums.



1ucky #19 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:26 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 71604 battles
  • 630
  • Member since:
    11-05-2013

View PostGremlin182, on 12 August 2017 - 07:01 AM, said:

Im getting close to the T55A so any potential buffs to that would be of interest.

I'm mostly hoping thet when the Foch 155 becomes a special tank they make it a proper premium in all respects.

 

As I keep telling them there is NO decent french premium TD that can be used for crew training and credit grinding and while a tier 10 probably isn't ideal for credit grinding its way better than a tier 3 like the Pak 40 So please don't leave it with typical tier 10 repair costs.

Its that or finally stop making endless premiums for other parts of the game so at least the French have one.

Come on you can spare the time other nations are drowning in premiums.

The Foch 155 won't be premium in regards to credits, so don't hope for that as you'd only get disapponted.

 

On a positive note though:

The FCM36Pak40 is actually pretty good as a crew trainer nowadays, with the +/- 1 MM of Tier III.


Edited by 1ucky, 12 August 2017 - 07:27 AM.


Rico_Shay #20 Posted 12 August 2017 - 11:30 AM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 33110 battles
  • 160
  • Member since:
    11-26-2014
Whats the point of all that struggle to get the T55a if it´s going to be an under perfoming tank?
You'll get a paper tank with useless penetration (201mm), that wont make any credits and will cost a fortune to play, even if you win without using consumable or prem ammo.

Edited by Rico_Shay, 12 August 2017 - 11:45 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users