Jump to content


Modifying a simple rule

Introducing Friendly Fire mo

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

eucrysseu #1 Posted 12 August 2017 - 04:10 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 31417 battles
  • 1
  • [B-D-O] B-D-O
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012
Hello Dear Colleagues and Player, I appeal to you in this way to support the Friendly Fire implementation of the Game, so as not to give other players the chance to provoke or be provoked to break the rules, it's so simple, you do not have to If it is implemented in the next update this way, and this way there will be no one to lose, Why allow a player to shoot in the team mate when it is much easier to block this intention? So I appeal to you to support this mode of way, NOT TO LEAVE TO GET INTENTIONAL OR ACCIDENTAL SHOOTING  IN TEAM  MATES

Edited by eucrysseu, 12 August 2017 - 08:46 PM.


PowJay #2 Posted 12 August 2017 - 04:49 PM

    Colonel

  • Player
  • 33768 battles
  • 3,949
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012
NO!

SABAOTH #3 Posted 12 August 2017 - 05:19 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 36318 battles
  • 2,873
  • [-133-] -133-
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011
I can't read, could you please use a larger font?

unhappy_bunny #4 Posted 12 August 2017 - 05:32 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 17409 battles
  • 2,131
  • [-OC-] -OC-
  • Member since:
    08-01-2012
No. I am happy with things the way they are. If people cannot use common sense and exercise a bit of self-control, then that deserve to be banned. As to players messing up my game, well, I just report them and carry on with the next game.

laulaur #5 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:47 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 46450 battles
  • 986
  • [FOXX] FOXX
  • Member since:
    08-11-2011

I see you like large fonts.

My answer is: NO!

 

And put the damn title in english, this is the english section of the forum...:facepalm:



NUKLEAR_SLUG #6 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:49 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 26618 battles
  • 1,610
  • Member since:
    06-13-2015
Nyet comradeski!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users