Jump to content


credits for Teer10


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

Hern_The_Hunter #1 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:02 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24193 battles
  • 7
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011
I play in wows and wot thing is in world of tanks at the moment we are penalised for playing with t10 tanks spg and td witch when u think about it its stupid in t10 you would suppose that the best tanks would earn more credits and the tanks would be more resilient and yet it seems to me wot is different to world of war ships in which t10 nearly always make the right amount of credits etc that you would be happy with yet wot is ridiculous as when you push to get a tear 10 only to find you cant afford to play in it as it is nearly always loosing credits SPG now the t10 even with a good game performance is very poor credit earning Or is it just me I have only been playing this game since the beginning and seen many changes re balances and armour changes etc I'm at a stage now where I think war gaming cant get anything write I have complained all the time with issues but I all ways get a crap answer blaming other departments to end all I can say is if war gaming cant get this balance sorted  there are loads of games snapping at their heels so look out war gaming.

CoDiGGo #2 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:09 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Player
  • 15024 battles
  • 570
  • [NEUR0] NEUR0
  • Member since:
    05-10-2015
Business, to play best tiers 9-10 you need prem. account

Jigabachi #3 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:10 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 17948 battles
  • 19,559
  • [T-D-U] T-D-U
  • Member since:
    08-12-2011
Not going to read that. Back to elementary school, please.

But to be a bit more helpful - use these:
..,.?....,..,..,.,!!..,,.?

Damage_inc #4 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:18 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Player
  • 13474 battles
  • 64
  • [UKT] UKT
  • Member since:
    10-29-2014

Can someone google translate this?

 

 



Homer_J #5 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:21 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Beta Tester
  • 29674 battles
  • 31,394
  • [WJDE] WJDE
  • Member since:
    09-03-2010

View PostHern_The_Hunter, on 12 August 2017 - 07:02 PM, said:

 in t10 you would suppose that the best tanks would earn more credits 

 

They do.

 

They also cost more to repair and for ammunition.  So if you play well you can earn, if you play badly you lose badly.

 

What they do in Boats is irrelevant.



GalmTwo #6 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:22 PM

    Sergeant

  • Player
  • 7446 battles
  • 237
  • [F-A-D] F-A-D
  • Member since:
    08-28-2014
I refuse to read that block of text. You could've at least used commas and punctuation marks.

Nazgarth #7 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:44 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 28472 battles
  • 1,188
  • [-TWO-] -TWO-
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011

WG takes botting seriously :teethhappy:

22k battles 43%w/r

 



PowJay #8 Posted 12 August 2017 - 07:57 PM

    Brigadier

  • Player
  • 36046 battles
  • 4,275
  • Member since:
    09-07-2012

Nazgarth, on 12 August 2017 - 06:44 PM, said:

WG takes botting seriously :teethhappy:

22k battles 43%w/r

 

 

I think it's fair to say that his general level of intelligence is comparable to his level of gaming skill. Simple truth is all.

 

I tried to read the wall of text, but when I realised where it was going, I gave up.

 

He can't make credits in tier X. I wonder why....

 

Vehicle                                           Av dmg,         Battles,    WR,      Wn8


Edited by PowJay, 12 August 2017 - 08:03 PM.


SABAOTH #9 Posted 12 August 2017 - 08:00 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 37099 battles
  • 2,915
  • [-133-] -133-
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011

View PostHern_The_Hunter, on 12 August 2017 - 07:02 PM, said:

I play in wows and wot thing is in world of tanks at the moment we are penalised for playing with t10 tanks spg and td witch when u think about it its stupid in t10 you would suppose that the best tanks would earn more credits and the tanks would be more resilient and yet it seems to me wot is different to world of war ships in which t10 nearly always make the right amount of credits etc that you would be happy with yet wot is ridiculous as when you push to get a tear 10 only to find you cant afford to play in it as it is nearly always loosing credits SPG now the t10 even with a good game performance is very poor credit earning Or is it just me I have only been playing this game since the beginning and seen many changes re balances and armour changes etc I'm at a stage now where I think war gaming cant get anything write I have complained all the time with issues but I all ways get a crap answer blaming other departments to end all I can say is if war gaming cant get this balance sorted  there are loads of games snapping at their heels so look out war gaming.

 

Formatting is important, otherwise

 



Hern_The_Hunter #10 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:30 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 24193 battles
  • 7
  • Member since:
    03-18-2011
looks like the usual [edited]on this forum:amazed:

RamRaid90 #11 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:33 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 22415 battles
  • 6,676
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostHern_The_Hunter, on 13 August 2017 - 11:30 AM, said:

looks like the usual [edited]on this forum:amazed:

 

Yes spouted by yourself.

 

The game is DESIGNED for bad players and even good players over a longer period to be unable to play the highest tiers without gaining credits lower down.

 

Otherwise, the middle tiers would be empty and everyone would be flooding tier X tanks all the time. This means that newer players will have nobody to play with and subsequently will be leaving the game early because of que times.

 

Did your brain engage before your "fantastic" idea?


Edited by RamRaid90, 13 August 2017 - 12:33 PM.


Spurtung #12 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:34 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 65929 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostHern_The_Hunter, on 13 August 2017 - 01:30 PM, said:

looks like the usual [edited]on this forum:amazed:

 

You're right, the usual bot unable to write in a readable way while mixing everything up.

RamRaid90 #13 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:36 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 22415 battles
  • 6,676
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostHern_The_Hunter, on 12 August 2017 - 06:02 PM, said:

 there are loads of games snapping at their heels so look out war gaming.

 

Also this, there are no other games in this genre which are ANYWHERE near as successful as WoT. War Thunder is horribly bad and "The WoT killing game" Armoured Warfare died long before it even began.

 

SO no, WoT will not lose anyone to these "competitors"

 

As a side note, please stay away from tiers 3+....



Spurtung #14 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:36 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 65929 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View PostRamRaid90, on 13 August 2017 - 01:33 PM, said:

que times.

C'mon man...queue. The word is queue.



ApocalypseSquad #15 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:39 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 26641 battles
  • 2,061
  • Member since:
    07-31-2011
I think that the tail off in profitability of higher tier tanks is one of the smarter things WG has done, for reasons already explained above.

RamRaid90 #16 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:40 PM

    Lieutenant General

  • Player
  • 22415 battles
  • 6,676
  • [D0NG] D0NG
  • Member since:
    12-14-2014

View PostSpurtung, on 13 August 2017 - 11:36 AM, said:

C'mon man...queue. The word is queue.

 

Adding two letters to make a word is already bad enough when the letter itself would be sufficient...I ain't adding 4 letters ;)

Edited by RamRaid90, 13 August 2017 - 12:40 PM.


lord_chipmonk #17 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:40 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 34409 battles
  • 10,259
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012

View PostSpurtung, on 13 August 2017 - 12:36 PM, said:

C'mon man...queue. The word is queue.

 

The word is also tier, but that doesn't seem to have stopped OP from complaining about his Teer10 tonks. 

ApocalypseSquad #18 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:44 PM

    Captain

  • Player
  • 26641 battles
  • 2,061
  • Member since:
    07-31-2011

View PostRamRaid90, on 13 August 2017 - 12:40 PM, said:

 

Adding two letters to make a word is already bad enough when the letter itself would be sufficient...I ain't adding 4 letters ;)

 

u

 

​Here you go, I'll give you the "u".  Maybe someone else can chip in with the "e"?


Edited by ApocalypseSquad, 13 August 2017 - 12:44 PM.


Spurtung #19 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:45 PM

    Major General

  • Player
  • 65929 battles
  • 5,900
  • [GW-UP] GW-UP
  • Member since:
    07-05-2013

View Postlord_chipmonk, on 13 August 2017 - 01:40 PM, said:

 

The word is also tier, but that doesn't seem to have stopped OP from complaining about his Teer10 tonks. 

 

I don't have enough consideration for the OP to bother with it.

lord_chipmonk #20 Posted 13 August 2017 - 12:46 PM

    Field Marshal

  • Player
  • 34409 battles
  • 10,259
  • [-HOW-] -HOW-
  • Member since:
    12-23-2012

View PostApocalypseSquad, on 13 August 2017 - 12:44 PM, said:

 

u

 

​Here you go, I'll give you the "u".  Maybe someone else can chip in with the "e"?

 

Come on now, we can't do all the work for him. He needs to get it himself. :P




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users