Jump to content


Missing a Trick.... Suggestion for another Clone Tank/s


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

Grinnen_Baeritt #1 Posted 13 August 2017 - 03:37 PM

    Private

  • Player
  • 65852 battles
  • 40
  • [RTRUK] RTRUK
  • Member since:
    02-11-2012

With the recent release of Thunderbolt, T24/58M, and numerous other clone's as Premiums... not too mention the Jap Tiger and the IDENTICAL  Tiger 131

 

 

 

 

 

So, why hasn't WG added the Tetrach to the BRITISH light tank tree as a Premium?.

 

 

 

It IS a British tank after all...  (although perhaps that's why?... Hmmmmm ;) ;)


 

Also WG, while you are about it, please add the "Harry Hopkins" as well, virtually same tank... virtually NO programming effort AND It's a real tank.


 

Also, why not have a desert map for low tiers?. That way we can spend money buying winter Camo for all our low tier stuff as well.... VARIETY IS GOOD....



SABAOTH #2 Posted 13 August 2017 - 04:02 PM

    Major

  • Player
  • 36437 battles
  • 2,914
  • [-133-] -133-
  • Member since:
    08-28-2011

because is a little monster.

 

Is a devastating sealclubber

 



Phobos4321 #3 Posted 13 August 2017 - 04:04 PM

    General

  • Player
  • 43095 battles
  • 8,214
  • Member since:
    09-27-2011

thunderbolt T34-85M, Tiger (Jap/131) are what tier ? 

now go back and check the tierlevel of a tetrach

 

if it isnt something special like the pz J thats sold in a package for ~100 €  it would be harldy worth for wg ...



Grinnen_Baeritt #4 Posted 14 August 2017 - 11:56 AM

    Private

  • Player
  • 65852 battles
  • 40
  • [RTRUK] RTRUK
  • Member since:
    02-11-2012

I know what tier they are.. but if they are going to clone tanks, just to re-sell, why can't they allow a British tank, that is already in the game, to be on the British Tech Tree, even if it is as a Premium Tier 3. ?

I'd rather they add tanks that did exist rather than INVENT entire lines of tech-trees for nations like the Chinese..

 

 

There has been too much "re-skinning" of the same tanks, with marginal tweaks (or none) in the case of the tiger 131. It's just lazy profiteering.



eldrak #5 Posted 14 August 2017 - 12:14 PM

    Second Lieutenant

  • Player
  • 46578 battles
  • 1,005
  • [NE-VO] NE-VO
  • Member since:
    01-27-2011

View PostGrinnen_Baeritt, on 14 August 2017 - 10:56 AM, said:

There has been too much "re-skinning" of the same tanks, with marginal tweaks (or none) in the case of the tiger 131. It's just lazy profiteering.

 

Reskinning is the best thing that can happen to this game.

 

Some income for WG to keep the game running.

No power creep as nothing new is added.



InfrequentHazard #6 Posted 14 August 2017 - 07:05 PM

    Corporal

  • Player
  • 27644 battles
  • 128
  • Member since:
    06-22-2014
Why stop at the Tetrarch? Locust, Churchill III, T14, Ram II, there's a case for British reskins for all of those too.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users